Another Leftist greentard fail in California

T. A. Gardner

T. A. Gardner

Serial Thread Killer
Seems California passed a law about 10 years ago banning non-reusable / recyclable plastic bags. The plastic bag industry responded by making one that fit the law. The problem is that nobody recycles the bags and even if they did they really aren't recyclable, just reusable--something nobody does either. The result is a huge increase in the tonnage (nearly 50% more) of plastic waste going into California landfills...

https://phys.org/news/2024-02-california-war-plastic-bag-backfired.html

Just another ill-conceived failure by Leftists thinking that people will act altruistically.
 
If we didn't have far too many people on the planet,
we would not require these very annoying but possibly necessary [albeit too late] environmental measures.

We didn't throw a bag on it before fucking like crazed rabbits,
and the world is repaying us by no longer supporting human habitation.

It actually sounds pretty fair.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Seems California passed a law about 10 years ago banning non-reusable / recyclable plastic bags. The plastic bag industry responded by making one that fit the law. The problem is that nobody recycles the bags and even if they did they really aren't recyclable, just reusable--something nobody does either. The result is a huge increase in the tonnage (nearly 50% more) of plastic waste going into California landfills...

https://phys.org/news/2024-02-california-war-plastic-bag-backfired.html

Just another ill-conceived failure by Leftists thinking that people will act altruistically.
Click to expand...

Same has happened in my dystopia WA state but I would estimate that the plastic per bag is triple.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
If we didn't have far too many people on the planet,
we would not require these very annoying but possibly necessary [albeit too late] environmental measures.

We didn't throw a bag on it before fucking like crazed rabbits,
and the world is repaying us by no longer supporting human habitation.

It actually sounds pretty fair.
Click to expand...

The world supports more humans than ever, dingus. :palm:
 
NiftyNiblick said:
If we didn't have far too many people on the planet,
we would not require these very annoying but possibly necessary [albeit too late] environmental measures.

We didn't throw a bag on it before fucking like crazed rabbits,
and the world is repaying us by no longer supporting human habitation.

It actually sounds pretty fair.
Click to expand...

There are not too many people on the planet. Bowing to your king doesn't change anything.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
If we didn't have far too many people on the planet,
we would not require these very annoying but possibly necessary [albeit too late] environmental measures.

We didn't throw a bag on it before fucking like crazed rabbits,
and the world is repaying us by no longer supporting human habitation.

It actually sounds pretty fair.
Click to expand...
You could help by not hanging around so long. :dunno:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top