Another dead anti-vax moron who won't be voting for Trump in 2024. ROTF!!

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Yes, his reasoning was irrational at best....goes to show how extremist right wing anti-abortion stances can affect the mind.

Now, here's something for you to mull over:
https://www.ibtimes.com/10857-fully-...alized-3326930

Now I know you're all hyped about low percentages, but that little comfort to the dead folks families....keeping in mind this was last year.


Argument from randU fallacies. Covid19 does not kill.

Covid-19, like any other viral infection, can indeed kill. It depends upon the individual, left untreated and how they are treated. I speak from personal experience, and the Rand corporation is NOT what I sourced, if you'd bother to actually read the content of the link to. To claim such is your personal "fallacy".
 
Covid-19, like any other viral infection, can indeed kill.
No. Covid19 does not kill. NONE of the viruses from the Covid/SARS series of viruses kill.
It depends upon the individual, left untreated and how they are treated.
There is no treatment for Covid authorized by the FDA.
I speak from personal experience,
So you are saying you are dead???
and the Rand corporation is NOT what I sourced, if you'd bother to actually read the content of the link to. To claim such is your personal "fallacy".
What hallucination is this? I never claimed you sourced the Rand Corporation. There is no such thing as a 'personal fallacy'.
 
No. Covid19 does not kill. NONE of the viruses from the Covid/SARS series of viruses kill.

There is no treatment for Covid authorized by the FDA.

So you are saying you are dead???

What hallucination is this? I never claimed you sourced the Rand Corporation. There is no such thing as a 'personal fallacy'.

1. And what is your proof of such a claim? Any fool knows that some viruses are more potent than others, and left untreated can indeed result in a fatality.

2. True to a degree....what is being peddled as treatments are essentially released under an emergency provision. By regular standards, NONE of these "vaccines" would be distributed to the general population until after MONTHS of thorough vetting.

3. Stop acting dumber that you are. If you don't have a logical or fact based refutation to what I post, just grow up and concede. No one knows who you really are, so there's no shame.

4. You wrote in response to my previous post, " Argument from randU fallacies". Now if this is another one of your neologisms, then please define it for the reading audience. Otherwise, grow up and concede your error.
 
1. And what is your proof of such a claim? Any fool knows that some viruses are more potent than others, and left untreated can indeed result in a fatality.
No variant of the Covid/SARS series kills. That includes covid19.

Anything from cancer, to pneumonia, to car accidents, to people falling off a ladder and killing themselves has been listed as a 'covid death'.
2. True to a degree....what is being peddled as treatments are essentially released under an emergency provision. By regular standards, NONE of these "vaccines" would be distributed to the general population until after MONTHS of thorough vetting.
A vaccine is not a treatment for covid19. A vaccine (if it works) is a preventative. Once you are infected with covid19, it's useless.
3. Stop acting dumber that you are. If you don't have a logical or fact based refutation to what I post, just grow up and concede. No one knows who you really are, so there's no shame.
RQAA.
4. You wrote in response to my previous post, " Argument from randU fallacies". Now if this is another one of your neologisms, then please define it for the reading audience. Otherwise, grow up and concede your error.
RQAA. Making up random numbers and using them as data is a fallacy, dude.
 
Anti-Vax Priest Who Claimed Vaccines Contain ‘Aborted Embryos’ Dies of COVID
Don Paolo Romeo had reportedly ignored the pleas of friends and colleagues to get inoculated before he wound up ill, spending a month in the hospital before dying at age 51.

OVER 18,000 (AS OF LAST OCTOBER...MUCH HIGHER BY NOW) FULLY VACCINATED AMERICANS WON'T BE VOTING FOR ANYONE....AND?
 
A vaccine is not a treatment for covid19. A vaccine (if it works) is a preventative. Once you are infected with covid19, it's useless.

Vaccines are like condoms or body armor; they are protection against possible negative outcomes. There's no guarantees. Only fucking morons and psychos pass on extra layers of protection.

Those who became infected, depending upon their illness and variant, can achieve different layers of protection but it's a crap shoot without knowing their exact genetic strengths and weaknesses. Regardless, it's still stupid to pass on extra protection being used by billions of people around the world.

I'm fully vaxxed including booster and am in the over-65 risk group. Will you admit your vax status and age or are you too paranoid, Sybil?

PTn8X7z.png
 
Gee,....who would have ever thought that cheering on the DEATH of fellow Americans would actually be repulsive to NORMAL people. :rolleyes: These people are stupid. :laugh:

Why are you worried about stupid people?
 
No variant of the Covid/SARS series kills. That includes covid19.

Anything from cancer, to pneumonia, to car accidents, to people falling off a ladder and killing themselves has been listed as a 'covid death'.

A vaccine is not a treatment for covid19. A vaccine (if it works) is a preventative. Once you are infected with covid19, it's useless.

RQAA.

RQAA. Making up random numbers and using them as data is a fallacy, dude.

1. I asked for proof, not your parroted opinion coupled with supposition and conjecture. What is your source material for your previous statement? If you can't produce such directly for the readership, then you're just blowing smoke.

2. I never said otherwise. If the patient gets over a virus after treatment, a vaccine shot would be redundant unless it has a PROVEN tract record of preventing a relapse better than the patient's own anti-bodies.

3. I take it back...you are this dumb if you think insipid stubbornness hides your folly. You have no real retort or facts to back up your claims and accusations, so this neologism somehow makes you feel better. The objective, rational reader just sees your folly. (car accidents? ladder mishaps? Suicide? Exaggerate much?)

4. Stop lying about what I post

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...or-Trump-in-2024-ROTF!!&p=4934471#post4934471

clearly, the content of the link provided in this post is not fabricated. See, your denial is not proof of anything. Since you are incapable of rational discussion beyond a certain point, I'll just let you RQAA yourself out and wish you pleasant dreams.
 
Last edited:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Volsrock just ignores what he can't disprove or refute. Typical of a racist, right wing bull horn.


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...71#post4934471



I can prove the slut is a science denier



The slut and the left calls Bruce Jenner a woman...DNA science says otherwise


I don't give a damn about that other BS, as I've already dismissed irrational rhetoric. My point is that YOU avoid dealing with the information in my link. Why?
 
Anti-Vax Priest Who Claimed Vaccines Contain ‘Aborted Embryos’ Dies of COVID
Don Paolo Romeo had reportedly ignored the pleas of friends and colleagues to get inoculated before he wound up ill, spending a month in the hospital before dying at age 51.

Based on U.S. Constitutional law as a lawlessly hacked or installed imposter of illegitimate so-called president, and who engaged in a conspiracy to unleash war against America that resulted in the covid death of over 800,000 Americans and tRump and his Cheetolini insurgency conspiring to incite insurrection against Democracy, humanity and anything else of a civilized nature on Earth instead of being on a putrid ballot, the Cheetolini tRump, in particular, deserves to be housed at a super maximum federal prison until the day his life is over and to no longer be a pestilence and tyrant on humanity.
 
Vaccines are like condoms or body armor; they are protection against possible negative outcomes. There's no guarantees. Only fucking morons and psychos pass on extra layers of protection.

Those who became infected, depending upon their illness and variant, can achieve different layers of protection but it's a crap shoot without knowing their exact genetic strengths and weaknesses. Regardless, it's still stupid to pass on extra protection being used by billions of people around the world.

I'm fully vaxxed including booster and am in the over-65 risk group. Will you admit your vax status and age or are you too paranoid, Sybil?

PTn8X7z.png

Argument from randU fallacy. Quoting random numbers as data is a fallacy.
Covid19 does not kill.
 
1. I asked for proof, not your parroted opinion coupled with supposition and conjecture. What is your source material for your previous statement? If you can't produce such directly for the readership, then you're just blowing smoke.
RQAA.
2. I never said otherwise. If the patient gets over a virus after treatment, a vaccine shot would be redundant unless it has a PROVEN tract record of preventing a relapse better than the patient's own anti-bodies.
It can't. Denial of microbiology.
3. I take it back...you are this dumb if you think insipid stubbornness hides your folly. You have no real retort or facts to back up your claims and accusations, so this neologism somehow makes you feel better. The objective, rational reader just sees your folly. (car accidents? ladder mishaps? Suicide? Exaggerate much?)
No exaggeration. These types of death were actually labeled covid19 'deaths'. Did you know that these bureaucrats are paid to report high numbers?
4. Stop lying about what I post
clearly, the content of the link provided in this post is not fabricated. See, your denial is not proof of anything. Since you are incapable of rational discussion beyond a certain point, I'll just let you RQAA yourself out and wish you pleasant dreams.
I'm not. Irrelevance fallacy. Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Spewing random numbers as data is NOT a proof. Inversion fallacy.
 
Back
Top