Airstrip One
Completely Effed
England has been left alone for nearly 1000 years, and still no culture. We're just trying to follow in your footsteps.
Another court issues injunction against travel ban
- Thread starter Timshel
- Start date
England has been left alone for nearly 1000 years, and still no culture. We're just trying to follow in your footsteps.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Yet despite that we managed somehow to shape the modern world and drag it out of the dark ages.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You ignorant peasants really need to wake up and see what is going on, this might help?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sJxyYCzsfBc
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sJxyYCzsfBc
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Since when does anyone outside the boarders of the US...that is not a US CITIZEN have constitutional rights of any kind....be it the establishment clause or any other clause? The US President has all authority to enforce US STANDING IMMIGRATION LAW, its his duty. The PRESIDENT can ignore the establishment clause when it comes to screening foreign nationals of any kind, any type, any faith. Why: These murderers have no constitutional rights until they are standing on US SOIL, and no one is officially on US SOIL until they pass US IMMIGRATION and CUSTOMS SCREENING...at any US PORT OF ENTRY to include international airports.
And the law clearly states that Any alien or any faction of Aliens can be detained and denied entry to US SOIL at the presidents discretion. ANY means ANY, regardless of faith....FYI: All islamic terrorist attacks are documented to be 100% Muslim. Its a most difficult thing to attempt to screen for islamic terrorist activity without screening MUSLIMS. Laugh My Ass Off. Just how stupid are these supposed constitutional scholars?
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
Lost what? Was there an election? The only thing lost was the last election...the reason for this dog and phony show that will amount to nothing, just like all the other SURPRISES! Remember, December, Recount, Riots,..etc.. all of which amounted to what? Squat. This will be no different....The president is smart....he will let this continue into the court system as long as possible by stalling...months, even a year or so...until right before the next election in 2018. In the meanwhile another EO will be drafted in a language that can't be challenged even by the most loony leftist....and this nation will secure its borders. And the NEW Supreme Court will demonstrate to the nation....just how much the left hates the nation...it refuses to secure....right about time for the midterms....where the demokrauts have 25 seats up for grabs right in the middle of TRUMP LAND.
GOP: Super majority. Demokraut land gone forever.
Last edited:
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Um, the wops started the process.
Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
Lost what? Was there an election? The only thing lost was the last election...the reason for this dog and phony show that will amount to nothing, just like all the other SURPRISES! Remember, December, Recount, Riots,..etc.. all of which amounted to what? Squat. This will be no different....The president is smart....he will left this continue into the court system as long as possible by stalling...months, even a year or so...until right before the next election in 2018. In the meanwhile another EO will be drafted in a language that can't be challenged even by the most loony leftist....and this nation will secure its borders. And the NEW Supreme Court will demonstrate to the nation....just how much the left hates the nation...it refuses to secure....right about time for the midterms....where the demokrauts have 25 seats up for grabs right in the middle of TRUMP LAND.
GOP: Super majority. Demokraut land gone forever.
The court case for his EO...
Poor ralphie boy
#14: Rojava is a Syrian enclave that includes Armenian xians. The problem is that these xians must suffer from a type of Alzheimer's originating from their own country. Armenian pagans killed their children and committed suicide rather than forego the violence of the evangelical christian advance. When 1500 years ago xians were accused of atheism, they indeed got a taste of their own medicine.
'Better a street-sweeper than a judge.' (Deleuze)
Adjudication gone 'nannas, this latest church-and-stategesture crosses the line into delirium, a bizarre offspring of Law.
Klebnikov's Godfather of the Kremlin is much more available than his Conversations with a Barbarian. We excerpt from the latter's original Russian edition so that the reader understands the danger of sabotage to pipelines under the Great Lakes. Sharia 'path to water[Ru. Put k vode].'
'Khoz Akhmed Nukhayev: "Chisto dlia stroitel'stva gosudarstva -- eto kak raz samyi put."
(Klebnikov, Ragovor s varvarom [Conversation with a Barbarian])
Nukhayev says "Purely for State-building." Deleuze and Guattari have already shown that the State always already arises fully formed ('Apparatus of Capture, in A Thousand Plateaus. So just what does Nukhayev mean by that?
Russian word put/t 1.) to tangle 2.) to confuse, mix up. Russian puta/'t'sia 1.) to get tangled 6.) to get mixed up with, get tangled up with, to carry on with a person of the opposite sex.
Russian word sam/yi used in conjunction with nouns, especially denoting points of time or place, and with tot and etot, 'the very right'; v samoe vremia á the right time'; s samogo nachala 'from the very outset, right from the start'; s samogo utra 'éver since the morning, since first thing.
It does seem that Nukhayev wants to have sex with this Thing, apparently, the State.
'Better a street-sweeper than a judge.' (Deleuze)
Adjudication gone 'nannas, this latest church-and-stategesture crosses the line into delirium, a bizarre offspring of Law.
Klebnikov's Godfather of the Kremlin is much more available than his Conversations with a Barbarian. We excerpt from the latter's original Russian edition so that the reader understands the danger of sabotage to pipelines under the Great Lakes. Sharia 'path to water[Ru. Put k vode].'
'Khoz Akhmed Nukhayev: "Chisto dlia stroitel'stva gosudarstva -- eto kak raz samyi put."
(Klebnikov, Ragovor s varvarom [Conversation with a Barbarian])
Nukhayev says "Purely for State-building." Deleuze and Guattari have already shown that the State always already arises fully formed ('Apparatus of Capture, in A Thousand Plateaus. So just what does Nukhayev mean by that?
Russian word put/t 1.) to tangle 2.) to confuse, mix up. Russian puta/'t'sia 1.) to get tangled 6.) to get mixed up with, get tangled up with, to carry on with a person of the opposite sex.
Russian word sam/yi used in conjunction with nouns, especially denoting points of time or place, and with tot and etot, 'the very right'; v samoe vremia á the right time'; s samogo nachala 'from the very outset, right from the start'; s samogo utra 'éver since the morning, since first thing.
It does seem that Nukhayev wants to have sex with this Thing, apparently, the State.
The court case has not been lost its simply been stayed. Educate yourself...there was never an issue of the EOs constitutionality...only a false claim by a radical court that foreign nationals are subject to US Constitutional protection....and the only method to make that claim even appear plausible was to reject the amendment of the original EO...why? Because the court had already made up its mind as to what issue they could use to validate a continued stay of implementation.......the possibility of irreparable harm...to Muslims already on US soil, which is both irrational and illogical, as there was no permanent ban of Muslims....only a pause in order to construct a better method of screening the Muslims coming into this nation as 100% of all Islamic acts of terror are Muslim by nature and fact.
Its impossible to screen for Islamic terror threats without screening Muslims. The Presidents exact point all throughout the victorious campaign. No one has ever suggested there be a 'permanent' ban of Muslims coming into this nation....only a better screening process where practically none exists right now making it most improbable to know just what Muslim already in the states is actually part of a sleeper cell of terrorist design.
As stated the stay...is moot, and all it takes to make it totally non-effective is the simple draft of another EO in the language of the amended first EO.
If you can't believe the writing.....watch pictures and pay particular attention when the LIPS of Donald Trump are moving. There never was a suggestion of permanently banning Muslims from the US.....the "exact words" taken out context even by the radical judges was, Muslims, which make up 100% of all Islamic terrorist activity, must be banned.....get ready, UNTIL...that's right UNTIL, such time as Congress can act on a proper method to screen the immigration thereof.
They say a picture is worth a thousand words...well here's both. Proving the 9th circuit is completely misrepresenting the actual content and context of Trump's statement about banning Muslim Immigration. Is that a surprise? Of course not, its what the left does...it cherry picks words away from their complete contextual message. Just exactly what part of..."...until congress can determine exactly what the hell is going on..." do the leftists feign to be unambiguous? It quite clear....Muslims should be subject to better vetting processes where none exists right now....from nations that are war torn with no method of keeping accurate record of just who is a citizen of that nation and who is not, who is a member of a terrorist organization and who is not, who is a criminal and who is not....
Last edited:
'To point to Stupidity, and transfix it.
(Foucault, Theatrum Philosophicum)
The concept this judge is arguing for concerns sui generis encounters, the same modus operandi we have just exampled in the Armenian rhizome, and American prisoners should now be more clued up about The Left:
'Only is a common law judgment can express through the modification of its concepts its cause in an encounter can it be adequate. Taking the necessary precautions, we could call this judgment leftist. Remember that for Deleuze the left has nothing to do with the realization of political protocols but is tantamount to embracing movement. In this same way, the Supreme Court's Delgamuukw decision is not of the left because it upholds minority rights or advances multiculturalism. Instead, it is leftist in its acknowledgment of movement (i.e., the recognition of sui generis encounters), and, with that acknowledgment, it is able to construct an effective adjudicative problem. Deleuze says that "being open [to movement] is (setting out the facts [italics]), not merely of a situation but of a problem. Maiking visible things that would otherwise remain hidden"
(LeFebvre, The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza)
The concept of "ïntent" is the CIA/FBI's traditional conundrum', and since the DNC is accelerating the problem with the Flynn case, it further complexifies the job of quality vetting of migrants. Neither the Chappaqua Blue Racer nor the Arab son, Obama, are the friends of American prisoners now forced to do Armenian pagan imitations due to the ponography of islamochristian pre-nuptials.
(Foucault, Theatrum Philosophicum)
The concept this judge is arguing for concerns sui generis encounters, the same modus operandi we have just exampled in the Armenian rhizome, and American prisoners should now be more clued up about The Left:
'Only is a common law judgment can express through the modification of its concepts its cause in an encounter can it be adequate. Taking the necessary precautions, we could call this judgment leftist. Remember that for Deleuze the left has nothing to do with the realization of political protocols but is tantamount to embracing movement. In this same way, the Supreme Court's Delgamuukw decision is not of the left because it upholds minority rights or advances multiculturalism. Instead, it is leftist in its acknowledgment of movement (i.e., the recognition of sui generis encounters), and, with that acknowledgment, it is able to construct an effective adjudicative problem. Deleuze says that "being open [to movement] is (setting out the facts [italics]), not merely of a situation but of a problem. Maiking visible things that would otherwise remain hidden"
(LeFebvre, The Image of Law: Deleuze, Bergson, Spinoza)
The concept of "ïntent" is the CIA/FBI's traditional conundrum', and since the DNC is accelerating the problem with the Flynn case, it further complexifies the job of quality vetting of migrants. Neither the Chappaqua Blue Racer nor the Arab son, Obama, are the friends of American prisoners now forced to do Armenian pagan imitations due to the ponography of islamochristian pre-nuptials.
Logically and reasonably there can be no objectivity of "INTENT" until such time as ACTION demonstrates the premeditated "INTENT". Can anyone point to the four corners of the questioned EO....and point out the action that demonstrates the intent of BANNING ALL MUSLIMS? Of course not. Its only in left loony land can judges read minds and prevent an action before it happens through preemptive supernatural mind reading skills.
The point being....they even had to take Mr. Trumps words away from the integrity of the contextual message to make a Claim that he was attempting to BAN ALL MUSLIMS. His words are documented in stating that Muslim immigration should be banned until such time as congress can figure out a method to properly vet the Muslims coming into this nation void of any real vetting process with the status quo.
As demonstrated in the previous post....He clearly with no ambiguity whatsoever makes his intentions clear.....a halt to Muslim immigration due to the fact that 100% of all Islamic terrorists are Muslim by nature and fact...until...again, that's UNTIL, a temporary time, Congress ACTS to properly secure this nation.
Last edited:
Vnutrennie amerkanskie kornevishcha: ataka mecheti Kvebek: Bissonette eto imia Lakota, i risk vreditel'stvo k truboprovodu ozera.
Internal American rhizome: the Quebec mosque attack: Bissonette is a Lakota name, and the risk is sabotage to the Lake Superior pipeline.
Bissonette is American Indian Movement, linking Leonard Peltier and Anna Mae Pictou-Aquash for the siege at Pine Ridge. In addition, the census of Somalians links to Pictou-Aquash at the Red School House in Minneapolis: the Somali census for Minneapolis was known at least as early as 1979, the year of the Iranian Revolution. This is also the year for arson of the covered bridge at Ada, Michigan, linking to De Vos DNA: Ada, Michigan was originally a beaver-fur trading post. The Educator, eyes rolled back, wailing in agony, "Lines of the Universe are feminine, lines of the State, prostitutional. "
Internal American rhizome: the Quebec mosque attack: Bissonette is a Lakota name, and the risk is sabotage to the Lake Superior pipeline.
Bissonette is American Indian Movement, linking Leonard Peltier and Anna Mae Pictou-Aquash for the siege at Pine Ridge. In addition, the census of Somalians links to Pictou-Aquash at the Red School House in Minneapolis: the Somali census for Minneapolis was known at least as early as 1979, the year of the Iranian Revolution. This is also the year for arson of the covered bridge at Ada, Michigan, linking to De Vos DNA: Ada, Michigan was originally a beaver-fur trading post. The Educator, eyes rolled back, wailing in agony, "Lines of the Universe are feminine, lines of the State, prostitutional. "
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Who knows but if there is an explosion somewhere a Catholic is probably behind it.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Damn Yankee is a Catholic and he doesn't like blowjobs!
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
If they have any legal rights (granted whenever the government makes a law concerning them) then they have Constitutional rights. For instance, refugees have due process rights because US law prohibits the return of refugees who are likely to face torture.
The President is not empowered to violate the Constitution. Where did you get this idiotic idea? Such a thing is impossible.
Congress is not empowered to grant the President an exemption to the first and fifth amendments. How can they grant a power they don't have?
Again, dumbass, there are no non Muslim Islamic ______? If one is not Muslim then why would anyone describe that persons actions as Islamic?
Trump's motion for a stay was denied. The EO has been enjoined by multiple courts now.
Foreign nationals have always been afforded Constitutional protection.
What amendment of the EO? I think you must be referring to guidance given by WH counsel.
All A's are A's! Yes, we know that. STFU RETARD!
Everyone should actually read this opinion. I think this smack down might be my favorite part.
The "specific sequence of events" leading to the adoption of the EO bolsters the Commonwealth's argument that the EO was not motivated by rational national security concerns. As the declaration from the national security experts states, ordinarily an executive order prioritizing national security is based "on cleared views from expert agencies with broad experience on the matters presented to [the president]." But here there is no evidence that such a deliberative process took place. To the contrary, there is evidence that the president's senior national security officials were taken by surprise. Although Giuliani suggested that the EO was formulated by a "whole group of very expert lawyers" and at least two members of Congress, this process appears to have taken place during the campaign and there is no evidence that this commission was privy to any national security information when developing the policy. Once again, defendants have offered no evidence to the contrary.
The "specific sequence of events" leading to the adoption of the EO bolsters the Commonwealth's argument that the EO was not motivated by rational national security concerns. As the declaration from the national security experts states, ordinarily an executive order prioritizing national security is based "on cleared views from expert agencies with broad experience on the matters presented to [the president]." But here there is no evidence that such a deliberative process took place. To the contrary, there is evidence that the president's senior national security officials were taken by surprise. Although Giuliani suggested that the EO was formulated by a "whole group of very expert lawyers" and at least two members of Congress, this process appears to have taken place during the campaign and there is no evidence that this commission was privy to any national security information when developing the policy. Once again, defendants have offered no evidence to the contrary.
Last edited: