Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion

Arminius said:
Yes, lashing out hysterically totally proves me wrong about you being butthurt. Another incredibly well-thought-out comeback. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

^Folks, it’s impossible to fix this kind of massive stupidity. The best one can do is to continue to point out their willful ignorance.
 
Arminius said:
You closing your eyes, covering your ears, and refusing to acknowledge evidence that has been posted (repeatedly) demonstrating that both of these things in fact are happening, prolifically I might add, does not constitute a counterpoint. That's just you throwing a tantrum against reality.

Try again.

GetAttachmentThumbnail
Click to expand...


You're lying and playing victim.. Homosexuals do not force their lifestyle on anyone.. and Muslims don't even apply for jobs hauling beer.
 
domer76 said:
^Folks, it’s impossible to fix this kind of massive stupidity. The best one can do is to continue to point out their willful ignorance.
Click to expand...

Typical behavior for right-wing newbies who show up here thinking they'll out-smart everybody here.

... then comes the crash. :0)

He's a virgin.
 
blackascoal said:
Typical behavior for right-wing newbies who show up here thinking they'll out-smart everybody here.

... then comes the crash. :0)

He's a virgin.
Click to expand...

He’s a smart-assed little punk that has little-to-no real world experience in the workplace. And ZERO knowledge of civil rights legislation.

Just “Christian” victimhood.
 
Last edited:
Arminius said:
Top to bottom, left to right. It's called reading.

Again, the free market punishes people and corrects this problem without the need to trample anyone's rights (not that this is good enough for totalitarian leftist control freaks).

Who: The people using "their businesses to act like bigots and push a discriminatory agenda," as already stated.

When: Whenever someone "uses their businesses to act like bigots and push a discriminatory agenda," as already stated.

Where: Wherever someone "uses their businesses to act like bigots and push a discriminatory agenda," as already stated.
Click to expand...

On and on and on and on. Trying to convince yourself or something? :)
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
You Republicans are a fuzzy math bunch of hypocrites!

You hypocrites have never been able to explain the Log Cabin Gay Republicans whose membership is in the millions- yet you cling to their votes like a fly on shit!

GTFO!

If that is not a "I'll take one up the ass for my team" example, I wouldn't know what one is! LOL!
Click to expand...

You didn't have a problem sticking your nose up an unqualified black BOY's asshole, son. Why do you lower yourself to that level?
 
domer76 said:
^This supposed lawyer is cluless about anti-discrimation laws?

Good thing your law school doesn’t know you’re here demonstrating your ignorance. Such a blight on their reputation.
Click to expand...

you do realize that no laws were ever written that say two men in a civil union is a "marriage" right?.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
gay marriage and the law suit mentioned above show that you are wrong about both...
Click to expand...

The mind of a f@ggot is totally corrupt.

If a f@ggot wants to force someone make same-sex art or perform some other same-sex activity, in analogy, the f@ggot is committing rape with the help of the law, while pretending to be the victim if the real victim resists.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
because of the opinion of a judge......not because of a law......
Click to expand...

Another f@ggot lie is that marriage has benefits. In net, marriage is harshly punished by the government. But, the f@ggots don't want legal marriage for the "benefit" of having their sodomite relationships regulated and taxed by the government, but to serve as a platform to coerce others to treat sodomy as morally legitimate and to force others to engage in same-sex activities, such as in the OP.

And, you're right, activist judges pulled it out of their @sses that the US constitution requires the federal government to recognize same-sex marriage and treat it as equal to heterosexual marriage.
 
Bobb said:
Another f@ggot lie is that marriage has benefits. In net, marriage is harshly punished by the government. But, the f@ggots don't want legal marriage for the "benefit" of having their sodomite relationships regulated and taxed by the government, but to serve as a platform to coerce others to treat sodomy as morally legitimate and to force others to engage in same-sex activities, such as in the OP.

And, you're right, activist judges pulled it out of their @sses that the US constitution requires the federal government to recognize same-sex marriage and treat it as equal to heterosexual marriage.
Click to expand...

"Activist judge": noun; does not rule the way I want them to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top