Sonny boy, I’ve been in the workplace longer than you’ve been alive. Well versed in workplace and anti-discrimination laws.
You, on the other hand, are a pitiable homeschooled little shitweasel that wouldn’t know the law from a hole in the ground.
Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
Sonny boy, I’ve been in the workplace longer than you’ve been alive. Well versed in workplace and anti-discrimination laws.
You, on the other hand, are a pitiable homeschooled little shitweasel that wouldn’t know the law from a hole in the ground.
Nice try, Domer.
But anything said to Arminius beyond "You are an asshole" is a waste of words.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
no.....I'm not a baker......
Constitution?
'The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.' ..
President John Adams
Treaty of Tripoli
Article 11:
As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
Ratified by the United States Senate without debate unanimously in 1797.
Your first error is in reacting mindlessly to the word "Constitution," as if pointing out that the Federal Government discriminating against any religion is unconstitutional is somehow asserting that we are a Christian nation, or that the Founders ever said we were. It's completely off-topic, but since you're wrong about everything else you assert here as well, we'll dig into your misinformation (which was likely spoon-fed to you by absurd partisan extremist Keith Olbermann, as he is where a good deal of this easily-debunked myth started).
Even ultra-liberal Politifact acknowledges that this is dishonest spin, because Adams was trying to placate "the Barbary Powers [who] often declared that they were 'at war with all Christian nations' unless and until a treaty was signed" stating otherwise. Meanwhile, all the evidence not coming from those trying to rewrite history to suit liberal bigotry thoroughly refutes your embarrassingly ignorant assertions, like this: John Adams on Thanksgiving: Ask God to Make Our Schools ‘Nurseries of Sound Science, Morals and Religion’
The out-of-context quotes liberals use to misrepresent our Founders as non-Christian also include ones like this from John Adams: “This would be the best of all possible worlds if there were no religion in it.” What they don’t bother to include is the full quote from this letter to Thomas Jefferson on April 19, 1817, which completely reverses the meaning:
Another misleading quote liberals love to use is this statement from Thomas Jefferson in 1814: “Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.” What they leaving out this time is the fact that that Jefferson is referring to British law, not U.S. law:
Sleazy, corrupt, and dishonest…as usual.
Also, the Founding Fathers (many of whom held seminary or Bible school degrees) are overwhelmingly on the record personally identifying themselves as Christians, acknowledging that we are a Judeo-Christian country, and governing directly based on Christian teachings and principles. As the Heritage Foundation notes, Thomas Jefferson (the left’s supposed champion of strictly secular governance) even “issued calls for prayer and fasting as governor of Virginia” and “drafted bills stipulating when the governor could appoint ‘days of public fasting and humiliation, or thanksgiving,’ and to punish ‘Disturbers of Religious Worship and Sabbath Breakers.’
Heritage adds that Jefferson also “closed his second inaugural address by encouraging all Americans to join him in seeking ‘the favor of that Being in whose hands we are, who led our forefathers, as Israel of old….’ And two days after completing his letter to the Danbury Baptists, he attended church services in the U.S. Capitol, where he heard John Leland, the great Baptist minister and opponent of religious establishments, preach.” This is not someone who believed that all things Christian should be eradicated from all things public. As usual with liberal contentions, their utterly false depiction of Thomas Jefferson as some kind of militant secularist has zero actual basis in fact, and serves merely to further their Constitution-shredding agenda against ever having to witness or tolerate free religious exercise.
Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, and John Adams did unmistakably believe in preventing the Federal Government from adopting a national religion at the expense of the religious rights of the states. Some of them were even outspoken critics of organized religion. Some of them even wanted to reduce government involvement with religion at the state level. But to suggest that these men were not religious, not Christian, not governing based on Christianity, or not perfectly fine with government acknowledging our Judeo-Christian heritage is dishonest in the extreme.
Additionally, Benjamin Franklin, who liberals incessantly use to prop up their erroneous “church and state” fabrication, once proposed that America’s National Seal be an image of Moses parting the Red Sea, with the inscription, “Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God.” And the left’s “separation of church and state” myth can be found nowhere in the Constitution. It was fraudulently invented out of thin air. The only restriction whatsoever that exists regarding government and religion is the 1st Amendment protection of the States and of the individual against the establishment of a national religion. Some of the ratifying states, like Massachusetts, even actually HAD official state religions at the time of the Founding.
Finally, the Declaration of Independence (our core founding document…written by Thomas Jefferson) expressly identifies Natural Rights (the notion that we get our rights not from man, but from a higher power) as the justification for our self-liberation from Britain.
Got any other lies you would like to tell, or are you good for now?
Last edited:
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Sure, you completely missed the utter desperation of your angst. All your arguments have been regurgitated ad infinitum. Nobody gives a damn about your arguments.
I'm sure it must be a lot of fun sitting on a message board pretending that you're smarter than everyone else. But if you were truly smarter, wouldn't society be swinging your way instead of against what you think you believe?
Gays have never been more empowered than they are today.
... and you are part of your own problem. :0)
Blame Evangelicals for the Decline in Christian Faith
https://www.thedailybeast.com/blame-evangelicals-for-the-decline-in-christian-faith
Do come back if you require more help.
So now we're back to admitting that you did in fact argue that having to witness any acknowledgement of our Judeo-Christian heritage somehow violates people's rights. Glad we cleared that up. And to answer your question, you having to witness things you don't like in no way violates your rights. What liberals are doing only to Christians (fining, suing, bankrupting, and even jailing them for not participating in homosexual weddings) is what an actual violation of someone's rights look like.
An entire generation that is utterly incapable of distinguishing rights from "things I like."
Questioning this tyrannical, butthurt need to tear down any acknowledgement of our Judeo-Christian heritage (what actual bigotry and intolerance look like) does not make those questioning it the ones who are tyrannical and butthurt.
You mean the people being singled out and turned into second-class citizens (did you miss that central part of what is being discussed here?), sure, "privileged."
Like Jews in 1939 Germany didn't "get to cry about not getting their way." Because being illegally fined, sued, bankrupted, and jailed for violating no one's rights and simply abstaining from participating in homosexual weddings is such a "minor inconvenience."
You forgot your Swastika.
Which almost makes it anyone's fault other than the Muslim who took a job knowing he might have to deliver alcohol.
Psst, your hypocrisy is showing.
Translation: Me refusing to comprehend anything anyone is saying makes me right. Just ask me.
Hence the election of Trump and the Democrats getting one of the worst showings in any midterm elections in the last century (and having to cheat and rig their way into getting that much).
Do you ever stop being stupid and wrong?
Translation: When you can't validate your argument, just derail into debating how much more likely you think you are to be right...based entirely on assumption and conjecture.
Socrates scores another devastating blow. LOL
Somebody's triggered. LOL
lol
Someone of your massive ignorance would think that.
I love watching fools humiliate themselves in public. You are providing that amusement. Non-stop
Sure, you completely missed the utter desperation of your angst. All your arguments have been regurgitated ad infinitum. Nobody gives a damn about your arguments.
I'm sure it must be a lot of fun sitting on a message board pretending that you're smarter than everyone else. But if you were truly smarter, wouldn't society be swinging your way instead of against what you think you believe?
Gays have never been more empowered than they are today.
... and you are part of your own problem. :0)
Blame Evangelicals for the Decline in Christian Faith
https://www.thedailybeast.com/blame-evangelicals-for-the-decline-in-christian-faith
Do come back if you require more help.
It's a debate site, genius. You came to a debate site to peddle misinformation, got exposed for blatantly lying, and instead of responding to anything you were proven dead wrong about, you now descend into ad hominem attacks.
Thanks for confirming that you have lost this debate.
Yes, lashing out hysterically totally proves me wrong about you being butthurt. Another incredibly well-thought-out comeback.
Gotcha68
Verified User
So now we're back to admitting that you did in fact argue that having to witness any acknowledgement of our Judeo-Christian heritage somehow violates people's rights. Glad we cleared that up. And to answer your question, you having to witness things you don't like in no way violates your rights. What liberals are doing only to Christians (fining, suing, bankrupting, and even jailing them for not participating in homosexual weddings) is what an actual violation of someone's rights look like.
An entire generation that is utterly incapable of distinguishing rights from "things I like."
Questioning this tyrannical, butthurt need to tear down any acknowledgement of our Judeo-Christian heritage (what actual bigotry and intolerance look like) does not make those questioning it the ones who are tyrannical and butthurt.
You mean the people being singled out and turned into second-class citizens (did you miss that central part of what is being discussed here?), sure, "privileged."
Like Jews in 1939 Germany didn't "get to cry about not getting their way." Because being illegally fined, sued, bankrupted, and jailed for violating no one's rights and simply abstaining from participating in homosexual weddings is such a "minor inconvenience."
You forgot your Swastika.
Once again I never said my rights were violated or that I was oppressed or anything you seem to be grasping at. Boy are you making leaps of logic all over your replies.
I don't think you understand what persecution and second class citizenship actually means.
Luddly Neddite
Verified User
My bet is that no homosexual ever "put a gun to your head and force you to endorse and participate in their lifestyle".
OTOH, christianity is shoved down our throats constantly. Its christians who are trying to force us all to "endorse and participate in their lifestyle".
Translation: Me refusing to comprehend anything anyone is saying makes me right. Just ask me.
You can’t even understand English, fucktard, much less translate it.
Pitiable illiterate little cumstain, aren’t you?
Well, it's been fun humiliating incompetent liberal fallacies and misinformation for now. Stay triggered. See you all later.
Hilarious! Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Hence the election of Trump and the Democrats getting one of the worst showings in any midterm elections in the last century (and having to cheat and rig their way into getting that much).
Do you ever stop being stupid and wrong?
EXPOSED :0) You're just another right-wing dummy.
MIDTERM ELECTION RESULTS SAW REPUBLICANS SUFFER WORST HOUSE DEFEAT IN U.S. HISTORY BASED ON POPULAR VOTE
https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-midterms-popular-vote-worst-ever-1226441
Why Democrats didn't take the Senate despite winning 11 million more votes than Republicans
https://theweek.com/speedreads/8062...inning-11-million-more-votes-than-republicans
Election 2018: Democrats control all Orange County House seats as Gil Cisneros wins 39th Congressional District, completing blue sweep
https://www.ocregister.com/2018/11/...congressional-district-completing-blue-sweep/
I could go on .. and on. Not sure what midterms you were watching.
But what this proves is that you aren't nearly as intelligent as you think you are, nor are you an honest poster.
I didn't prove that .. you did.
Do come again. I like fucking with dumb people who think they're smart. :0)