Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion

[Guno צְבִי]

Muslims are not expected to violate their beliefs, but Christians are [insert every smear imaginable here] if they don't violate theirs. Sounds like you're the bigot here.

What America is dealing with here and now is the christian taliban and it's losing it's grip on society. They wanted to be treated as the prefered default belief system free to discriminate. Those days are coming to an end


ponder that goyim

 

[artichoke]

I just realized you're blaming liberals for stuff in Arizona. Arizona has had super majority red before, and is pretty red still, if I'm not mistaken. You talk Christian, but are flinging hate.

Translation: If Arizona is a red state, then the liberals cannot possibly have enacted discriminatory policies against Christiansthere. The single most half-witted attempt at a counterpoint I have witnessed in weeks. And no, I was not referring specifically to Arizona as liberals are trampling people's basic universal rights across the country. And no, flinging hate is more like putting a gun to the head of only one group of people and demanding that they endorse your lifestyle or be turned into second-class citizens.

Completely asinine. Try again.

 

[artichoke]

Awwww you poor persecuted 90% minority.

Translation: If there are a lot of Christians, then their rights cannot be violated. And unsurprisingly, your hilariously dishonest garbage logic here is off by about 20%.

 

[domer76]

Muslims are not expected to violate their beliefs, but Christians are [insert every smear imaginable here] if they don't violate theirs. Sounds like you're the bigot here.

Muslims operating a secular business follow the same laws Christians do, halfwit.

 

[domer76]

Translation: If Arizona is a red state, then the liberals cannot possibly have enacted discriminatory policies against Christiansthere. The single most half-witted attempt at a counterpoint I have witnessed in weeks. And no, I was not referring specifically to Arizona as liberals are trampling people's basic universal rights across the country. And no, flinging hate is more like putting a gun to the head of only one group of people and demanding that they endorse your lifestyle or be turned into second-class citizens.

Completely asinine. Try again.

^

Woefully ignorant of anti-discrimination and civil rights laws, the Equal Protection clause and history.

A true trifecta!

 

[Flash]

If you don't want to deal with the public then don't open your doors to the public. Not being allowed to force your religious views on others in the public domain is not an infringement of free exercise of religion.

Not making invitations does not force your religious views on anyone.

 

[Ross Dolan]

Translation: If Arizona is a red state, then the liberals cannot possibly have enacted discriminatory policies against Christiansthere. The single most half-witted attempt at a counterpoint I have witnessed in weeks. And no, I was not referring specifically to Arizona as liberals are trampling people's basic universal rights across the country. And no, flinging hate is more like putting a gun to the head of only one group of people and demanding that they endorse your lifestyle or be turned into second-class citizens.

Completely asinine. Try again.

Wow...you charge Apple with posting the most half-witted counterpoint...

...and then apparently indulged your jealousy by posting something MUCH more half-witted.

Congratulations.

You win!

 

[Lightbringer]

Not making invitations does not force your religious views on anyone.

Yes, it does, if you invited people in and then told them to fuck off.

 

[Flash]

Yes, it does, if you invited people in and then told them to fuck off.

I could do that without any religious motivation. I might be an atheist and dislike your looks and refuse to serve you. That is the same action with no religious issues involved.

Or, what if I was an atheist and just did not like gay people? I refused to serve them but no religious actions were involved. You would only be forcing your religion on others if they were required to profess certain religious beliefs or perform religious acts.

They might be violating civil rights laws, but they are certainly not forcing their religion on anybody else.

Secular civil rights laws do not trump a person's constitutional rights--whether this case does that depends on the circumstances of the case based on the courts freedom of religion guidelines.

 

[Lightbringer]

I could do that without any religious motivation. I might be an atheist and dislike your looks and refuse to serve you. That is the same action with no religious issues involved.

They might be violating civil rights laws, but they are certainly not forcing their religion on anybody else.

Secular civil rights laws do not trump a person's constitutional rights--whether this case does that depends on the circumstances of the case based on the courts freedom of religion guidelines.

I know how to lie and you don't. I'm sorry, I'm booked for the next year...is that so hard...

or, if you have to...build a big horse.

 

[Boris The Animal]

If you don't want to deal with the public then don't open your doors to the public. Not being allowed to force your religious views on others in the public domain is not an infringement of free exercise of religion.

That's where you are dead wrong and the SCOTUS agrees. Matthew 28:16-20 absolutely make it clear Biblical Christianity is to be a public, not private faith.

 

[Lightbringer]

That's where you are dead wrong and the SCOTUS agrees. Matthew 28:16-20 absolutely make it clear Biblical Christianity is to be a public, not private faith.

Yes, and we all care about what the Bible says.

Kill Yourself.

 

[Boris The Animal]

What America is dealing with here and now is the christian taliban and it's losing it's grip on society. They wanted to be treated as the prefered default belief system free to discriminate. Those days are coming to an end


ponder that goyim

Shut up, kike.

 

[Boris The Animal]

Yes, and we all care about what the Bible says.

Kill Yourself.

The Bible is the inerrant Word of God.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Translation: If there are a lot of Christians, then their rights cannot be violated. And unsurprisingly, your hilariously dishonest garbage logic here is off by about 20%.

Translation: Waaaa...my vagina hurts. I got called out for being a bigot.

Spare me your cry babying. Lifes to short for losers. You can't handle running with the big boys tough...deal with it...don't try hiding behind religion. That's for girls.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

The Bible is the inerrant Word of God.

And denial is just a river in Egypt.

 

[reagansghost]

Well Christians along with Arabs discriminate against the Jews all the time, everyone knows that. And the vast majority of Christian churches in America serve as a de facto headquarters for racism, and usually a bastion of white privilege. It's obvious Christians are paranoid snowflakes and have no problem supporting crooked wannabe dictators like Don

 

[Boris The Animal]

And denial is just a river in Egypt.

Who's denying what? That the persecution of Disciples of Christ is beginning here in America, which for so long protected our right to exercise our faith with no retaliation from big daddy government, then along come the Leftist special rights groups.

 

[Boris The Animal]

Well Christians along with Arabs discriminate against the Jews all the time, everyone knows that. And the vast majority of Christian churches in America serve as a de facto headquarters for racism, and usually a bastion of white privilege. It's obvious Christians are paranoid snowflakes and have no problem supporting crooked wannabe dictators like Don

And yet you forget that the people who solidly support Jews are Evangelicals (Guano notwithstanding)

 

[artichoke]

You hide the link, because it's rag news. It's bad enough, that I'd smack a family member, if any were stupid enough to partake. Christian law has nothing about denying Gays legal rights. In fact I believe it might actually teach the opposite. When Christians start acting more like Jesus, and less like hypocrites, I'd gladly let them do things their own way.

Crying over having to click the links and hysterically devolving into conspiracy theories (instead of just reasoning out that it's a tidier way to post six different links in the same argument—like a thinking adult would do) only speaks to your own stupidity. And there is no legal right to force people to endorse and participate in your lifestyle. That's not how rights work (seriously, take a first-year civics course sometime). You don't get to just decide you're entitled to something, crucify anyone who doesn't provide it to you, and then vindictively violate their actual rights in retaliation (speaking of hypocrisy, lol).

Stop throwing spoiled snowflake tantrums and try actually reasoning for yourself.