French Fur traders in 1700's north America were free, almost. Otherwise there will be government.
Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
French Fur traders in 1700's north America were free, almost. Otherwise there will be government.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
and what is the difference.....
The practice of law is not a retail outlet like a lunch counter or bakery .. When you go to a lawyer he doesn't have to take your case.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
again.....what is the difference between refusing to handle your divorce and refusing to print invitations to a gay facade "wedding"......
Big difference..
This may help you understand.
The Right to Refuse Service: Can a Business Refuse Service to Someone?
https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/...fuse-service-to-someone-because-of-appearance
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I know, right......
You appear to be really childish when you invent quotes.
In much the same way that a client can pick a lawyer that they feel comfortable with, the attorney can refuse to represent a client that they don't feel like they can adequately communicate with. There is no obligation for a client to hire a particular attorney or an attorney to represent a particular client.
In much the same way that a client can pick a lawyer that they feel comfortable with, the attorney can refuse to represent a client that they don't feel like they can adequately communicate with. There is no obligation for a client to hire a particular attorney or an attorney to represent a particular client.
You know PMP, a bus is obliged to pick up everyone waiting at the bus stop.. its not the same with lawyers.
You know PMP, a bus is obliged to pick up everyone waiting at the bus stop.. its not the same with lawyers.
But should a bus be required to pick up homosexuals...or blacks, or Mexicans? I mean, if bakers dont have to bake for them, why should bus drivers have to drive them around?
Sure wasn’t. They ruled on the equal protection clause, which is in the Constitution.
It is big in the RWNM. But I have not seen a creditable mass movement...One guy in Canada or something so the Trumpsters just round it off to all liberals.
“The Bible is the word of God"Then your point is even more irrelevant than I initially stated. Not only does it have nothing to do with whether or not religious discrimination is okay, but it doesn't even relate to your original (diversionary) point questioning the validity of people's beliefs. At worst, there is significant evidence that Jesus opposed homosexuality (the list already provided), and none showing that he didn't. No objective analysis could logically conclude the opposite of what all the evidence indicates.
Like I predicted, your point turned out to be completely unrelated and un-supported by the facts. Thanks for demonstrating. Moving on to someone who can actually debate.
"How can you be sure it's the word of God?"
"Because the Bible tells us so"
"Why believe the Bible?
"The Bible is infallible"
"How do you know it's infallible?"...
(Return to top)
Faith it the whole idea. I have faith there is a God. I dont need proof. In fact, with proof there would no longer be faith.
Ifs and shoulds don’t cut it, pally boy. Civil rights and anti-discrimination laws say they do.
Why does such a simple concept escape you?
Are potential divorcées a protected class? Of course not.
Good for you. You’re string of stupid questions remains intact.
Also live and let live
And the string of stupid questions continues.....
That’s great. The difference is that these extremists are using that circular argument and the “infallible” word of their god to justify discrimination.