Anita Hill

Grind you're banned from the next several threads I start for turning this thread into a Zimmerman thread, which I do not appreciate. Dead serious.

Superfreak you're banned from the next two for gleefully going along with it.
 
Grind you're banned from the next several threads I start for turning this thread into a Zimmerman thread, which I do not appreciate. Dead serious.

Superfreak you're banned from the next two for gleefully going along with it.

OH NO... WHAT WILL I DO... oh yeah... probably laugh.
 
So... he didn't start the confrontation... MARTIN did. He did fear for his life. Case dismissed. Martin the criminal brought it upon himself. No more whining from liberals.

GZ set the confrontation in motion by profiling TM and then exiting his vehicle to follow TM.

Case closed.
 
GZ set the confrontation in motion by profiling TM and then exiting his vehicle to follow TM.

Case closed.

Nope...

LIE DETECTOR... verified he did not start the confrontation.

Exiting a vehicle is also not equivalent to starting a confrontation. Fuckin hilarious that you think it is.
 
GZ was found not guilty. So was OJ.... it took a while, but karma caught up with OJ.... I feel confident it will catch up with George as well....
 
Grind you're banned from the next several threads I start for turning this thread into a Zimmerman thread, which I do not appreciate. Dead serious.

Superfreak you're banned from the next two for gleefully going along with it.

who can I appeal this to?
 
Nope...

LIE DETECTOR... verified he did not start the confrontation.

Exiting a vehicle is also not equivalent to starting a confrontation. Fuckin hilarious that you think it is.

Effin' hilarious that you completely discounted the phone call. Why did TM say on the phone "what are you following me for?"

"Martin had been talking to his girlfriend all the way to the store where he bought Skittles and a tea. The phone was in his pocket and the earphone in his ear, Crump said.
"He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man," Martin's friend said. "I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run, but he said he was not going to run."

Eventually, he would run, said the girl, thinking that he'd managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.

"Trayvon said, 'What are you following me for,' and the man said, 'What are you doing here.' Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. I called him again, and he didn't answer the phone."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/trayvon-martin-arrest-now-abc-reveals-crucial-phone/story?id=15959017
 
Nope...

LIE DETECTOR... verified he did not start the confrontation.

Exiting a vehicle is also not equivalent to starting a confrontation. Fuckin hilarious that you think it is.

in christies world as soon as you see someone exit a vehicle in the distance you can run up and just start beating the shit out of them and say you were being followed and you had the right to violently assault someone. zimmerman even said on the phone he didn't know where trayvon was, and casually talked to the dispatcher for another minute or two, obviously trayvon was no where in sight, and then of course zimmerman confirmed via two seperate lie detector tests that he was afraid for his life and he did not initiate the confrontation.

but who knows, maybe zimmerman made it all up, and got lucky that the ballistics evidence matched his story, eye witnesses that he wasn't even aware of at the time ended up corroborating his story, and he was able to mastermind passing two lie detector tests with flying colors.
 
Last edited:
I can't wait to see this! I think that she changed the country. I also am fascinated to see Senators who are still in elected office today during these hearings. These hearings proceeded the 1992 election, which became known as "the year of the woman". Four women were elected to the senate that year, and I can't remember how many to the House. I always thought that women watching on television as a row of white men battered Anita Hill brought them to the polls that year looking for change.

WALTHAM, Mass. — On the day in 1991 that the Senate confirmed Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court, Anita Hill — the little-known law professor who riveted the nation by accusing him of sexual harassment — faced news cameras outside her simple brick home in Norman, Okla., with her mother by her side, and politely declined to comment on the vote.

In the nearly 23 years since, Ms. Hill, now a professor of social policy, law and women’s studies at Brandeis University here, has worked hard, she likes to say, to help women “find their voices.” She has also found hers — and she is not afraid to use it.

“I believe in my heart that he shouldn’t have been confirmed,” she said in a recent interview, acknowledging that it irritates her to see Justice Thomas on the court. “I believe that the information I provided was clear, it was verifiable, it was confirmed by contemporaneous witnesses that I had talked with. And I think what people don’t understand is that it does go to his ability to be a fair and impartial judge.”


More:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/movies/anita-hill-is-celebrated-in-the-documentary-anita.html

I always found Ms. Hill's testimony to be dubious at best for this reason alone: why the hell did she wait so long? And why the hell did she not only stay on at the job, but stay in contact with with Thomas for professional reference?

Yeah, Thomas is a sleaze, not qualified for the SCOTUS and has some serious personal issues regarding his race and upbringing....but IMHO, Hill's motives were questionable at best.
 
Why am I not surprised that the party that founded the KKK would relish the modern day lynching of a black man?

She was and is a fraud.

Funny that we are always told that "sexual predators" are prolific and don't do it just one time yet good ole Anita was the only one lefties could drum up. Too bad they couldn't find a white woman.

Yet Clinton left a trail of victims of his sexual predation and so called feminists turn a blind eye
Darla's impervious to the truth. It comes with being the biggest penis envier of America's chat forums.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
Nope...

LIE DETECTOR... verified he did not start the confrontation.

Exiting a vehicle is also not equivalent to starting a confrontation. Fuckin hilarious that you think it is.


Effin' hilarious that you completely discounted the phone call. Why did TM say on the phone "what are you following me for?"

"Martin had been talking to his girlfriend all the way to the store where he bought Skittles and a tea. The phone was in his pocket and the earphone in his ear, Crump said.
"He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man," Martin's friend said. "I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run, but he said he was not going to run."

Eventually, he would run, said the girl, thinking that he'd managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.

"Trayvon said, 'What are you following me for,' and the man said, 'What are you doing here.' Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. I called him again, and he didn't answer the phone."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/trayvon-martin-arrest-now-abc-reveals-crucial-phone/story?id=15959017

First off, lie detector results are NOT admissible evidence in a court of law. Secondly, I put it to this idiot and his like minded compadres like this: The transcript of the event has Zimmerman telling the dispatch that while he was in his car, Martin came up to the window, checked him out then RAN AWAY. During the description, Zimmerman stated that he wasn't sure if Martin was armed. AFTER that, he's telling cops that he "lost" Martin...to wit the infamous question "Are you still following him" and statement "we don't need you to do that.

Now if Zimmerman was NOT looking for a confrontation, why the hell would he get OUT of his car to PURSUE a suspected armed criminal at night AFTER he was told the cops were on the way? Zimmerman was NOT a cop and NOT legally a part of the OFFICIAL neighborhood watch. Maybe he thought his gun gave him that right?

But knee jerk bigots like Superfreak will time and again IGNORE the rational, logical conclusion in favor of Zimmerman's tales.
 
Grind you're banned from the next several threads I start for turning this thread into a Zimmerman thread, which I do not appreciate. Dead serious.

Superfreak you're banned from the next two for gleefully going along with it.
You're passing out bans as if anyone cared.
 
Effin' hilarious that you completely discounted the phone call. Why did TM say on the phone "what are you following me for?"

"Martin had been talking to his girlfriend all the way to the store where he bought Skittles and a tea. The phone was in his pocket and the earphone in his ear, Crump said.
"He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man," Martin's friend said. "I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run, but he said he was not going to run."

Eventually, he would run, said the girl, thinking that he'd managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.

"Trayvon said, 'What are you following me for,' and the man said, 'What are you doing here.' Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. I called him again, and he didn't answer the phone."

http://abcnews.go.com/US/trayvon-martin-arrest-now-abc-reveals-crucial-phone/story?id=15959017

YEAH, let's just ignore the transcript that suggests Zimmerman was walking back to his car.
It works so much better that way.
 
First off, lie detector results are NOT admissible evidence in a court of law. Secondly, I put it to this idiot and his like minded compadres like this: The transcript of the event has Zimmerman telling the dispatch that while he was in his car, Martin came up to the window, checked him out then RAN AWAY. During the description, Zimmerman stated that he wasn't sure if Martin was armed. AFTER that, he's telling cops that he "lost" Martin...to wit the infamous question "Are you still following him" and statement "we don't need you to do that.

Now if Zimmerman was NOT looking for a confrontation, why the hell would he get OUT of his car to PURSUE a suspected armed criminal at night AFTER he was told the cops were on the way? Zimmerman was NOT a cop and NOT legally a part of the OFFICIAL neighborhood watch. Maybe he thought his gun gave him that right?

But knee jerk bigots like Superfreak will time and again IGNORE the rational, logical conclusion in favor of Zimmerman's tales.

Show where Zimmerman said that Trayvon "came up to his window, checked him out, and then ran away".

But it also looks like you have this idea that people aren't supposed to be concerned about what may be happening in their own neighborhood.
 
GZ was found not guilty. So was OJ.... it took a while, but karma caught up with OJ.... I feel confident it will catch up with George as well....

OJ did not kill in self defense. He brutally murdered his wife and Ron Goldman. Zimmerman was attacked by Martin and defended himself. But I know... you all are so caught up in your preconceived notion of a guilty verdict that you refuse to actually look at the evidence that was presented. I suppose next you will compare Zimmerman to Bundy or Dahmer?
 
Back
Top