Anita Hill

Superfreak said:
You really need to learn to use the quote button or simply address everything at the end.



[/COLOR]The above shows how dishonest you are on the topic. He 'lost' Martin AFTER he had gotten out of the car... he didn't lose him, THEN get out of the car. You just make shit up and then pretend it is what happened. As stated, it shows how dishonest you are.



More of your dishonesty. Nowhere does Zimmerman state that he thinks Martin is armed. Again, you are a dishonest hack who simply creates one straw man after another.
Click to expand...

If he got out of the car and lost him, as you say, then GZ was STILL full of it...acting like a cop AFTER he told the dispatch he thought TM was armed and had ID'ed him in the car.

Try again.
 
Taichiliberal said:
If he got out of the car and lost him, as you say, then GZ was STILL full of it...acting like a cop AFTER he told the dispatch he thought TM was armed and had ID'ed him in the car.

Try again.
Click to expand...

The chronology of the posts will show that you're just a FUCKING LYING HACK, WHO WOULD LIE TO HIS OWN MOTHER.

Show where he ever said the thought the thug Trayvon was armed.

Here's a link to the entire 911 transcript, so you don't have to now return and say you couldn't find it:
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?61068-I-can-t-believe-that-liberals-are-still-lying-about-this
 
Taichiliberal said:
If he got out of the car and lost him, as you say, then GZ was STILL full of it...acting like a cop AFTER he told the dispatch he thought TM was armed and had ID'ed him in the car.

Try again.
Click to expand...

Again... you completely lie. Nowhere in his call did he say he thought Martin was armed. NOWHERE. You are so full of shit.
 
Superfreak said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
If he got out of the car and lost him, as you say, then GZ was STILL full of it...acting like a cop AFTER he told the dispatch he thought TM was armed and had ID'ed him in the car.

Try again.
Click to expand...


Again... you completely lie. Nowhere in his call did he say he thought Martin was armed. NOWHERE. You are so full of shit.
Click to expand...

Now here's were you intellectual cowards on the neocon/teabagger side play dumb.....acting as if there is only ONE way in the American language to express a point/contention/assumption/accusation, etc.

From the transcript:

Zimmerman:

Yeah, now he’s coming toward me. He’s got his hands in his waist band.

And he’s a black male.[1:03]

911 dispatcher:

How old would you say he is?

Zimmerman:

He’s got something on his shirt. About like his late teens.

911 dispatcher:

Late teens?

Zimmerman:

Uh, huh.

Something’s wrong with him. Yep, he’s coming to check me out.

He’s got something in his hands. I don’t know what his deal is. [01:20]


TWICE Zimmerman refers to TM having his hands... first in his waist band and then having "something" in his hands. If you listen to the audio, Zimmerman is nervous, expressing apprehension as to TM motives and manners! Remember, Zimmerman already had described TM to the dispatch as a potential criminal who was acting suspicious...which would coincide with recent burglaries in the neighborhood.

If he didn't think TM might have been armed, then why keep referring to his hands as if they were a potential threat?

And remember, THIS WAS WHEN ZIMMERMAN WAS IN HIS CAR, BEFORE MARTIN "RAN AWAY" AFTER COMING UP TO LOOK AT HIM. Since Zimmerman had ALREADY given his location to the cops, there was NO NEED for him to get out of his car for further pursuit.

THAT IS WHAT INITIATED THE CONFRONTATION. HAD ZIMMERMAN STAID IN THE CAR, TM WOULD STILL BE ALIVE.

Now you can be Super Freak(ing) stubborn and just deny the chronology of the facts and refuse to concede a point, but no rational person buys insipid stubbornness as a valid point to argue. So if you've got nothing else on the subject, I'd say we're done.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Now here's were you intellectual cowards on the neocon/teabagger side play dumb.....acting as if there is only ONE way in the American language to express a point/contention/assumption/accusation, etc.

From the transcript:

Zimmerman:

Yeah, now he’s coming toward me. He’s got his hands in his waist band.

And he’s a black male.[1:03]

911 dispatcher:

How old would you say he is?

Zimmerman:

He’s got something on his shirt. About like his late teens.

911 dispatcher:

Late teens?

Zimmerman:

Uh, huh.

Something’s wrong with him. Yep, he’s coming to check me out.

He’s got something in his hands. I don’t know what his deal is. [01:20]


TWICE Zimmerman refers to TM having his hands... first in his waist band and then having "something" in his hands. If you listen to the audio, Zimmerman is nervous, expressing apprehension as to TM motives and manners! Remember, Zimmerman already had described TM to the dispatch as a potential criminal who was acting suspicious...which would coincide with recent burglaries in the neighborhood.

If he didn't think TM might have been armed, then why keep referring to his hands as if they were a potential threat?

And remember, THIS WAS WHEN ZIMMERMAN WAS IN HIS CAR, BEFORE MARTIN "RAN AWAY" AFTER COMING UP TO LOOK AT HIM. Since Zimmerman had ALREADY given his location to the cops, there was NO NEED for him to get out of his car for further pursuit.

THAT IS WHAT INITIATED THE CONFRONTATION. HAD ZIMMERMAN STAID IN THE CAR, TM WOULD STILL BE ALIVE.

Now you can be Super Freak(ing) stubborn and just deny the chronology of the facts and refuse to concede a point, but no rational person buys insipid stubbornness as a valid point to argue. So if you've got nothing else on the subject, I'd say we're done.
Click to expand...

So basically all you have, is your assumptions; regarding him thinking the thug Trayvon was armed, because he never said anything about a weapon or that he thought the thug Trayvon was armed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top