Anderson Cooper hilariously slams Trump supporter, Jeffery Lord.

Whether or not it was appropriate or shows bias, I don't care.

Of course you don't care; you're a massive lying liberal hypocrite on steroids. Liberals don't care about the truth, facts, reality or the Constitution.

This why the DNC continues its downward spiral into the abyss of human misery.
 
Last edited:

... essentially to the network, CNN, that was giving him heat for his comment.

Sort of like what Colbert got for calling Trump "Putin's cock holster." :0)

Both should get Emmy's for the moments in my opinion.

As I said after Trump was elected .. if people thought Obama had to take heat from the Right .. they ain't(eb) seen nothing yet. :0)
 
You missed the part where Andy said that Lord, a typical Trump apologist, would defend Trump if he took a dump on the desk of the Oval Office. Actually, I think Anderson was going way too easy. Trump has already done far, far worse and Trump apologists keep on apologizing.

What crimes has Trump committed? What is far, far worse?

In the small limited intelligence minds of liberals, his greatest crime was beating Hillary.

Dunce.
 
Cooper was not only right about the shameless Trumptard sycophant he was talking to there, but what he said applies to every Trumptard everywhere.

Dump could take a big, stinking Trump on his desk and every drooling Trumpsucker idiot in America would be twisting themselves into pretzels trying to justify it and put a positive spin on it.

Such is the depth of shamelessness you idiots have sunk to.

The only thing Cooper did was further diminish CNN's credibility and continue its decline into nothing more salient than a gossip column.
 
Funny .. you seem to have no problems with republican shills. :0) Is it that only your side gets to have 'shills?'
i do not like any shills..Republican shills are few and far between in the media -but they do exist,
and should get called out.

The problem is the entire media including NYTimes and WaPo and whole networks like CNN
are purveyors of fake news masquerading as "advocacy journalism" ( an oxymoron)
 
i do not like any shills..Republican shills are few and far between in the media -but they do exist,
and should get called out.

The problem is the entire media including NYTimes and WaPo and whole networks like CNN
are purveyors of fake news masquerading as "advocacy journalism" ( an oxymoron)

The problem is, that's not human nature. Bias always comes through in journalism .. especially network journalism .. and that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Let's talk about talk radio. Is there bias there?

Of course there is .. but the Left doesn't listen to talk radio .. SEE: Air America.

There are a myriad of choices where people can get news and information, not the least of which, the internet. Sound and factual information are not always handed to you, if at all. It is up to the individual to search and research the information they allow into their heads.
 
The problem is, that's not human nature. Bias always comes through in journalism .. especially network journalism .. and that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Bias in journalism is repugnant and should not be acceptable to anyone with a brain....which is why you are okay with it because brains are something you seriously lack.
 
The problem is, that's not human nature. Bias always comes through in journalism .. especially network journalism .. and that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Let's talk about talk radio. Is there bias there?

Of course there is .. but the Left doesn't listen to talk radio .. SEE: Air America.

There are a myriad of choices where people can get news and information, not the least of which, the internet. Sound and factual information are not always handed to you, if at all. It is up to the individual to search and research the information they allow into their heads.
you can't equate talk radio wit TV - the audience difference is YUGE.

I'm not even talking individual bias -sure that's expected. It's the systematic coverage by NTYTimes and WaPo
(both largely internet source s for MS news) that is built in "fake news"
( heavily biased -coverage for their pre-written narrative)..

Where do I look for actual news coverage? I'm reduced to FOX or foreign sites. Do I need to read South China Post for US coverage? it's actually come to that!
This is a problem that
 
We only have trump's word for it and we all know what that's worth.

Far more than the half breed that left in January. Pucker up and keep kissing his ass, homegirl. You're a prime example of the old adage of "once you go black, you never go back".
 
Back
Top