And the so-called 'non-existent' war on women continues...

just off hand, since the conservatives want to stop abortion, wouldn't it then be the liberals who want to stick the abortion tool in a woman's vagina?......

Nope. The liberals want the women who want the abortion tool inserted into their vaginas to be able to make that decision themselves, not be dictated to by backwards-thinking Republican rubes.
 
Nope. The liberals want the women who want the abortion tool inserted into their vaginas to be able to make that decision themselves, not be dictated to by backwards-thinking Republican rubes.

It's not just liberals.

Abortions are legal, last I heard.
 
Nope. The liberals want the women who want the abortion tool inserted into their vaginas to be able to make that decision themselves, not be dictated to by backwards-thinking Republican rubes.

and we just want you to stop killing your children......some would think those who want to kill their children were the ones thinking backwards.....
 
and we just want you to stop killing your children......some would think those who want to kill their children were the ones thinking backwards.....

That's nice. Guess what? If I want to kill my unborn child, I'm going to. You can feel about it any way you choose, but it's still none of your business.
 
So you admit, it is Liberals who are interested in women's vaginas?

No, rube. Liberals aren't interested in butting into the personal business of others, unlike you and your fixation on dictating to women what they can and cannot do with their vaginas.
 
That's nice. Guess what? If I want to kill my unborn child, I'm going to. You can feel about it any way you choose, but it's still none of your business.

For that matter, if you want to kill your BORN child, you are going to, regardless of how we feel. Why should we stop you? What right to do we have to say that is our business? It's clearly between you and the child, and we should just back off.... right?
 
So you admit, it is Liberals who are interested in women's vaginas?

Did she say that?

BTW, I'm interested in women's vaginas, just not in allowing the government to forcibly insert ultrasound wands into them...
 
For that matter, if you want to kill your BORN child, you are going to, regardless of how we feel. Why should we stop you? What right to do we have to say that is our business? It's clearly between you and the child, and we should just back off.... right?

No, rube. There's a difference between a child that's already born, breathing on its own, etc., and an unborn child completely dependent upon its mother's placental connection for its survival - especially in the first 18 weeks (just to be sure you and I are only talking legalities here). I know this difference - in utero vs already born - is a difficult concept for you to grasp. Study it hard, though, so you can contribute something that more closely resembles a point in this discussion.
 
No, rube. Liberals aren't interested in butting into the personal business of others, unlike you and your fixation on dictating to women what they can and cannot do with their vaginas.

Rube? You wouldn't be admitting defeat of the argument by creating a cute little nickname for me, would you? Just wondering, since you accused me of that earlier.

Sounds like liberals ARE interested in butting in to the personal affairs of others, and are fixated on the vagina. No one that I know of, has attempted to dictate anything regarding women's vaginas... again, this is intentional and deliberate hyperbole which can be completely dismissed in any serious debate. You run from one ridiculous hyperbolic charge to the next, and hope you can gin up enough emotive response, to continue doing what you have no legitimate ethical justification to do, and can make no valid argument for.

The debate is over termination of human life, and when that might or might not be 'appropriate' for us to condone as a civilized society.
 
Back
Top