And the beat goes on,

I want to see whatever transpires.

You, on the other hand, aren't so interested in allowing Comey the chance to clear his name of the shadow of perjury, are you?

Comey has already testified, several times, and the only individuals implying he is guilty of anything is conservatives, the same ones who refused to believe our past President was even an American citizen
 
Easy, "a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change; specifically : such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs (such as retirement income or health-care coverage)"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservatism
Sounds OK to me. Except I'm for a weak nat'l defense and I'd reword "individual financial responsibility for personal needs" to "personal financial responsibility for individual needs". Now back to my nap. zzzzzzzzz
 
And "all the parties involved" have claimed a number of things regarding the meeting, Junior himself has had several different narratives of the event, to date no one knows what transpired, but we do know they met with the Russian Gov't thereby directly involving the Kremlin in the US election

Now, that's a stretch lol.

Nobody knows what transpired, but you're sure it involved the Russians getting involved in the election? Have you thought this through?

One thing that's fairly certain about the Russian lawyer is she had an interest in Russian adoption issue: she was seen at a hearing involved with it, and was present when they showed a documentary on it to some people in congress, or something like that.

That covers the fact Junior shut the meeting down. Pretty much end of story.

She's also involved with Fusion GPS---the same outfit that was involved with the junk Piss Dossier. And the *fake* dossier was the pretext to unmask Trump's people under the Obama administration.

If I were the democrats, I'm not sure I'd be sniffing around that too much. But they're desperate, so they'll probably keep at it.
 
Is that so?

Let's see the proof.

No problem,

"The Crown prosecutor of Russia[a] met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father."

"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump"

To which Don Jr replies,

" Seems we have some time and if it’s what you say I love it "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_campaign–Russian_meeting
 
Now, that's a stretch lol.

Nobody knows what transpired, but you're sure it involved the Russians getting involved in the election? Have you thought this through?

One thing that's fairly certain about the Russian lawyer is she had an interest in Russian adoption issue: she was seen at a hearing involved with it, and was present when they showed a documentary on it to some people in congress, or something like that.

That covers the fact Junior shut the meeting down. Pretty much end of story.

She's also involved with Fusion GPS---the same outfit that was involved with the junk Piss Dossier. And the *fake* dossier was the pretext to unmask Trump's people under the Obama administration.

If I were the democrats, I'm not sure I'd be sniffing around that too much. But they're desperate, so they'll probably keep at it.

You acually believe that? Even Junior gave up the narrative that he went thinking it was about Russian adoptions, his Emails prove he went thinking it was dirt on Clinton provided by the Russian Government. Why believe anything he said regarding the meeting after he got caught in the first lie over what he thought its purpose was?

And you think Kushner and Maniford would take time in their day to attend a meeting they though was about adoptions?

If you need a bridge, I know a guy who will sell you one
 
No problem,

"The Crown prosecutor of Russia[a] met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father."

"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump"

To which Don Jr replies,

" Seems we have some time and if it’s what you say I love it "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_campaign–Russian_meeting

Russians with dirt on Hillary lol.

Who'd a thunk it.
 
You acually believe that? Even Junior gave up the narrative that he went thinking it was about Russian adoptions, his Emails prove he went thinking it was dirt on Clinton provided by the Russian Government. Why believe anything he said regarding the meeting after he got caught in the first lie over what he thought its purpose was?

And you think Kushner and Maniford would take time in their day to attend a meeting they though was about adoptions?

If you need a bridge, I know a guy who will sell you one

I'll grant they thought it might have been about Hillary.

But where is the dirt they got? Dirt=evidence and you need evidence to prove collusion.
 
There are gaps because the committee allowed Donnie Jr to testify without being sworn in.

He was free to lie his ass off and he did just that.
Not really. Lying to Congress/FBI is the same as perjury. He was told as much before the hearing.
 
No problem,

"The Crown prosecutor of Russia[a] met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father."

"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump"

To which Don Jr replies,

" Seems we have some time and if it’s what you say I love it "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_campaign–Russian_meeting

Crown prosecutor is not an office that exists in Russia.

From your own link.
 
What's there to be said that hasn't already been covered?

All the parties involved claim the meeting had nothing to do with the election---does anyone have evidence to the contrary?

We won't know until we start holding meetings in PUBLIC with anyone giving testimony, doing so UNDER OATH.
 
I bet Legion/Archives never posted about how the beat went on with his idol Hillary's investigations.

Sure I did, but in that case it was the redundancy of the same thing over and over in umpteen Congressional Committees eight years straight, they just wouldn't accept the reality that one can't disprove that which has yet to be proven
 
Back
Top