Anatta .. Are You Ready To Join Our Cause Now?

The president needs to represent people who disagree with him, do you really think in a million years Trump will do that, he reacts viciously to anyone who disagrees with him on anything.

Obama didn't so you can fucking deal with it if Trump gets elected. I don't much want a Trump Presidency, but I can live with more than a fucking cunt Hillary Clinton Presidency.

You have no room to talk after the shit you overlooked the last four years. Now you can suck it. I hope Trump puts you leftists in concentration camps along with the muslimes
 
oh please. Ambition and narcissism are 2 sides of the same coin. Do I think Clinton or Trump is more power-hungry?
and then do I think Clinton or Trump is more willing to use their arrogance of power ?

While Trump is a narcissist, we've seen Clinton utterly blow off criticism by "I didn't know" like last night on the 60minutes "extra"
but worse convene a cavalcade of ever widening lies to excuse her Emails. Until she had nowhere to go.

Right after Comey's scathing non-indictment she STILL shifted the blame to "more experienced officials" at State
for her various deceptive practices .She's a consummate shape-shifting power junkie warmongering screw up.
She's downright Nixonian, and the Democrats give her a pass.

so give me a break on who's character sucks the most.

Her character sucks, he has a mental illness.
 
Obama didn't so you can fucking deal with it if Trump gets elected. I don't much want a Trump Presidency, but I can live with more than a fucking cunt Hillary Clinton Presidency.

You have no room to talk after the shit you overlooked the last four years. Now you can suck it. I hope Trump puts you leftists in concentration camps along with the muslimes

Dixie, your back!
 
e756fc2c4754c4d8165071da89847c81.jpg

A vote for any 3rd party is a vote for Hillary.....show some balls and just vote her.....that will be the outcome anyway.....
 
oh please. Ambition and narcissism are 2 sides of the same coin. Do I think Clinton or Trump is more power-hungry?
and then do I think Clinton or Trump is more willing to use their arrogance of power ?

While Trump is a narcissist, we've seen Clinton utterly blow off criticism by "I didn't know" like last night on the 60minutes "extra"
but worse convene a cavalcade of ever widening lies to excuse her Emails. Until she had nowhere to go.

Right after Comey's scathing non-indictment she STILL shifted the blame to "more experienced officials" at State
for her various deceptive practices .She's a consummate shape-shifting power junkie warmongering screw up.
She's downright Nixonian, and the Democrats give her a pass.

so give me a break on who's character sucks the most.

I'll take un-presidential over a lying, corrupt, power hungry, scandal ridden, inept, and incompetent boob like her anyday.......

she has history, ignored by the partisan left, from her days in Arkansas.....she makes the organized crime racketeers look like a teenage street gang....
 
Patriotism is taking our government back from a spoils system of big donor /special interest Revolving Door plutocrats.

thanks.....well put.

Patriotism is supporting and defending the Constitution and its original intentions.....
 
A vote for any 3rd party is a vote for Hillary.....show some balls and just vote her.....that will be the outcome anyway.....

is trump that bad, that he can't win against hillary unless libertarians vote for him????? that's all the more reason for me to vote johnson
 
The president needs to represent people who disagree with him, do you really think in a million years Trump will do that, he reacts viciously to anyone who disagrees with him on anything.

:mad::mad:Tuff shit, if they wanted him to represent them, they would have voted for him.. They should feel lucky they aint getting deported..:rolleyes:
 
thanks.....well put.

Patriotism is supporting and defending the Constitution and its original intentions.....
supporting the text as written, not trying to decipher 'original intent' -or a nebulous 'living document'.

Credit Scalia for that idea (textualism); it's so obvious, but wasn't espoused.
 
supporting the text as written, not trying to decipher 'original intent' -or a nebulous 'living document'.

Credit Scalia for that idea (textualism); it's so obvious, but wasn't espoused.

wouldn't the TEXT AS WRITTEN be 'original intent'? or are you trying to say something else we're not seeing?
 
The president needs to represent people who disagree with him, do you really think in a million years Trump will do that, he reacts viciously to anyone who disagrees with him on anything.

You mean like having his goons take Ted Cruz signs away from protesters at the RNC? Oh wait that didn't happen but Hitlery did send her jack booted thugs to take Bernie signs from protesters at the DNC, Seig Heil mein Fuhrer Clitler all dissent must be squashed!
 
wouldn't the TEXT AS WRITTEN be 'original intent'? or are you trying to say something else we're not seeing?

Not necessarily.

The second amendment gets kicked around in debates over 'intent'; that is, what did the founders intend when they wrote 'well regulated militia'? Or the first amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" can mean a couple of different things when you consider the historical context in which it was written.

Whereas a textualist would take the words at face value. Very similar to strict biblical literalism by my understanding.

I don't necessarily subscribe to either doctrine. Taking into account historical context is helpful in interpreting texts, imo.
 
The system was rigged against Bernie .. he never stood a chance to get the nomination. Bernie's supporters are marching and protesting outside.


wall_zpsjqdwj7a4.jpg



sanders-wall-DNC_zpsagev2lds.jpg



I would like to argue that the thousands of undocumented delegates who are inhumanely kept out of the Democratic National Corruption Convention by a 4 miles long impenetrable wall, be allowed in to the Wells Fargo Arena and allowed to partake in our nations democratic process . . .

It's only fair!
 
wall_zpsjqdwj7a4.jpg



sanders-wall-DNC_zpsagev2lds.jpg



I would like to argue that the thousands of undocumented delegates who are inhumanely kept out of the Democratic National Corruption Convention by a 4 miles long impenetrable wall, be allowed in to the Wells Fargo Arena and allowed to partake in our nations democratic process . . .

It's only fair!

Oh, the irony lol!
 
Back
Top