is it relevant what a disinterested 3rd party thinks?
Its only relevant what the law says the Judge or jury can use to justify the fine.
is it relevant what a disinterested 3rd party thinks?
and yet they were still convicted based upon the 'preponderance of evidence' that wasn't sufficient at a criminal trial. Again, you statists and haters love being able to do this, but you'd be screaming fascism if this was being done to biden or obama and you fucking know it.
Maybe, but that would not make it punishment.
Its only relevant what the law says the Judge or jury can use to justify the fine.
You are complaining about a centuries old practice. Take it up with the founders.
they did take it up when they said that it was better that 10 guilty go free than to have 1 innocent imprisoned. you've betrayed them and the Constitution because you're filled with hate.
Do you not know the difference between a civil trial and a criminal trial?
Go back and read the first post.
No one has ever been imprisoned due to a verdict in a civil trial
i'll say this again for the mentally handicapped, such as you, if YOU were fined MILLIONS, or even tens of thousands, in a civil trial, especially for a underlying crime that they couldn't convict you of due to lack of evidence, YOU would feel punished.
don't even fucking deny it. end of story
SmarterthanYou said:they did take it up when they said that it was better that 10 guilty go free than to have 1 innocent imprisoned. you've betrayed them and the Constitution because you're filled with hate.
I guess you don't know the meaning of the word imprisoned. Not surprising since you seem to have problems understanding a lot of things.
i'll say this again for the mentally handicapped, such as you, if YOU were fined MILLIONS, or even tens of thousands, in a civil trial, especially for a underlying crime that they couldn't convict you of due to lack of evidence, YOU would feel punished.
don't even fucking deny it. end of story
pretty convenient that you want words to mean something now, when other times you have no fucking clue about them. that says a lot more about you than anything else, you partisan sack of shit
they did take it up when they said that it was better that 10 guilty go free than to have 1 innocent imprisoned. you've betrayed them and the Constitution because you're filled with hate.
i'll remember that the next time the courts decide something and you complain about it.
is it relevant what a disinterested 3rd party thinks?
Yup.Trump was not fined millions for an underlying crime. Trump was found liable for defamation and required to pay millions. Maybe you should actually educate yourself before you make such obvious false statements.
I wouldn't be stupid enough to continue to lie and defame when told to stop. If Trump had simply shut up, it would have cost him nothing.
If Trump had simply returned the documents and not hidden them, he wouldn't be indicted for crimes in Florida.
This is about Trump being too stupid to understand the real world and its consequences.