Americans disapprove of Trump's White House ballroom project — and East Wing demolition — by a more than 2-to-1 margin

hq720.jpg
And?
 
I doubt there is a poster here who has written more frequently about the value and importance of history.
:rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:
Why do you keep pushing back the timeline of when Trump is supposedly going to be "successful"?
I didn't push anything back. I've repeatedly said that I've expected "visible results" by the tail end of this year and early next year. I said that it would take roughly 6-12 months for gas prices to come down (and other prices will follow those), and gas prices have now come down (and within that very time frame that I posted towards the beginning of this year).

There's already been some visible results in other areas too, but there's still more that needs to happen yet for many people to really "take notice" that they are "better off" (and those things WILL happen with time, as the foundation for them to happen has been implemented since Day 1 of this term). Patience is a virtue.
Trump promised to end inflation on Day One.

He promised to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours.

He guranteed "200 deals in 100 days".
"Did you hear what Trump said THIS time?!?!" "Did ya? DIIIIID YAAAAAA??!!!"
:rolleyes:
 
If you do not believe in the science of probability and do not trust scientists and mathematicians to collect representative samples, then next time your doctor sends you for a blood draw make sure you demand the lab technician drain all of your blood.
Oh I'm sorry I didn't know Yahoo used science for their polls.

Sidenote: You're a female, right? It would make sense because I've noticed lately that far more libtard females are seriously evil bitches once you peel back a very thin layer. Your little joke about me being killed is the perfect example of what I'm talking about. Although you kind of phrased it as a 'joke', my guess is you would be perfectly happy if the person taking my blood did take it all.

I think if Yahoo did a online survey and people were honest with their answers we'd find out that liberal women are more likely to wish death on their political opponents than men. At this point it's just a theory but maybe yahoo could get on that one.

In the meantime you should consider getting a different therapist, the one you currently see isn't helping you, you're still an evil, bitter, hate filled bitch. I say this with love, get help, real help.
 

Poll: Americans disapprove of Trump's White House ballroom project — and East Wing demolition — by a more than 2-to-1 margin

A new Yahoo/YouGov survey shows that just 28% approve of how the president is handling the issue.



It's not up to poll respondents.
 
It us a Yahoo-Yougov poll. YouGov is an internationally recognized data analytics company.
Ok, great, I guess this means we should do something, right? I mean, if a poll suggests that a majority of the people are not in favor of something or want a certain policy enacted, that should be the end of the debate, right? The whole representative republic thing needs to be thrown away in favor of polling democracy, right?
 
If you do not believe in the science of probability and do not trust scientists and mathematicians to collect representative samples, then next time your doctor sends you for a blood draw make sure you demand the lab technician drain all of your blood.


An absurd analogy.
 
Ok, great, I guess this means we should do something, right? I mean, if a poll suggests that a majority of the people are not in favor of something or want a certain policy enacted, that should be the end of the debate, right? The whole representative republic thing needs to be thrown away in favor of polling democracy, right?
Stone fallacy.
 
Stone fallacy.
Is this your thing? Is this an argument or supposed to be a brilliant analysis? Just asking so I can be properly amazed. Maybe you could generously elaborate for those of us that struggle making sense out of dumbass libtards attempting to hide how stupid they are slinging around their new word of the week like confetti. Give it a shot, you can do it.
 
Is this your thing? Is this an argument or supposed to be a brilliant analysis? Just asking so I can be properly amazed. Maybe you could generously elaborate for those of us that struggle making sense out of dumbass libtards attempting to hide how stupid they are slinging around their new word of the week like confetti. Give it a shot, you can do it.
It works well. Look at you being silly about it.
 
To think an American president would build a ballroom using taxpayer dollars in a time like this is despicable at best.
trump has not built a ballroom. he does not even have a design for a ballroom.

trump has destroyed a ballroom, a theater, offices, huge number of irreplaceable documents, the equipment to scan those documents, etc. all to the tune of over a billion dollars in US taxpayers money, but he has not built a ballroom.

If he had given more time to move stuff out of the East Wing, we could have saved some of that money, but trump was in a rush not to build a ballroom. After all, we can see nothing happening now that he has destroyed a third of the White House.
 
trump has not built a ballroom. he does not even have a design for a ballroom.

trump has destroyed a ballroom, a theater, offices, huge number of irreplaceable documents, the equipment to scan those documents, etc. all to the tune of over a billion dollars in US taxpayers money, but he has not built a ballroom.

If he had given more time to move stuff out of the East Wing, we could have saved some of that money, but trump was in a rush not to build a ballroom. After all, we can see nothing happening now that he has destroyed a third of the White House.
AI Overview
Yes, historical artifacts from the East Wing were preserved, stored, and digitally scanned before its demolition. The White House Historical Association conducted a comprehensive digital scanning and photographic project to document the East Wing's every detail, and the physical artifacts have been removed and stored under the supervision of the White House and the National Park Service.
Digital and photographic records: A detailed digital record was created through 3D scanning and photography to preserve a record of the East Wing's structure and contents.
Artifact preservation: Historical artifacts were physically removed from the East Wing before demolition and have been preserved and stored.
Supervision: The preservation and storage of these artifacts were conducted under the supervision of the White House Executive Residence and the National Park Service.
Relocation of offices: Offices, such as the Office of the First Lady, were relocated to other parts of the White House complex before demolition began.
 
I doubt there is a poster here who has written more frequently about the value and importance of history.

Why do you keep pushing back the timeline of when Trump is supposedly going to be "successful"?

Trump promised to end inflation on Day One.

He promised to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours.

He guranteed "200 deals in 100 days".
He also said he'd replace Obamacare with something better......8 years ago.

His plan would be far superior to Obamacare, Trump boasted. It would be cheaper, better and provide “insurance for everybody.” Obamacare “is one of the greatest threats our country faces. It is unsustainable and will lead American into complete insolvency,” Trump said in one of his 435 tweets that bashed the Affordable Care Act..

....So what went wrong?


One theory is that Trump and his team were never serious about repealing Obamacare in the first place. It was just politics, something he said he would do during his election campaign.

It was noted, for instance, that the efforts to repeal lasted a mere 63 days. The Affordable Care Act, on the other hand, was passed in March 2010 after more than a year of debate involving Congress and the White House.

Another problem was that the promises Trump made, both about cutting costs and about improving care, rang hollow to many Americans. Even more so after a report by the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill would cut $880 billion from Medicaid over a decade, and would eventually cost 53 million Americans their health insurance, including 14 million in the first year.

One national poll found that only 17% of Americans supported Trump’s bill, with 56% in opposition and 26% undecided. Even among Republicans, support topped out at 24%.
.
 
I know. Like all the other insane and evil things trump does - his acolytes both in the administration and here hustle to backfill behind it with their twisted rationalizations - like when stupid people say, "stop complaining, we'll love it when it's done".
Gee, who does that sound like? ;)
 
AI Overview
Yes, historical artifacts from the East Wing were preserved, stored, and digitally scanned before its demolition. The White House Historical Association conducted a comprehensive digital scanning and photographic project to document the East Wing's every detail, and the physical artifacts have been removed and stored under the supervision of the White House and the National Park Service.
Digital and photographic records: A detailed digital record was created through 3D scanning and photography to preserve a record of the East Wing's structure and contents.
Artifact preservation: Historical artifacts were physically removed from the East Wing before demolition and have been preserved and stored.
Supervision: The preservation and storage of these artifacts were conducted under the supervision of the White House Executive Residence and the National Park Service.
Relocation of offices: Offices, such as the Office of the First Lady, were relocated to other parts of the White House complex before demolition began.
Can you remind me of the critical historical moments of history conducted in the East Wing?
 
Back
Top