american militia movement is a pack of anti American assholes

Look at these idiots defending a racist who keeps trying to scare people with the idea that he may have a gun.


Look at how scared they all are of a 55 year old woman who doesnt shiver at their tuff talk.

sack up boys bullets dont scare people in the internets
 
Look at these idiots defending a racist who keeps trying to scare people with the idea that he may have a gun.


Look at how scared they all are of a 55 year old woman who doesnt shiver at their tuff talk.

sack up boys bullets dont scare people in the internets
desh, it's not fear, it's ridicule. you're a moron who prefers statism to freedom. you and hacku can deny it all you want, but you're not liberals, you're statist authoritarians who should switch to the republican party.
 
Since you see-sesh, KKK'ers and Koch brother followers love the constitution so much maybe you should look up what 'a well regulated militia' means.


Liberals don't have guns! LOL!
 
Since you see-sesh, KKK'ers and Koch brother followers love the constitution so much maybe you should look up what 'a well regulated militia' means.


Liberals don't have guns! LOL!

I know it's hilarious! They say the same things over, and over, and over....the more things change the more they stay the same if your a bagger. States rights my ass.
 
Lib girleymen naturally do not like guns, basically because their FemiNazi gals tell them to hate guns or they won't put out for them, also many cannot hit the side of a barn with a gun, they are lame when it comes to shooting guns, I knew many in the Service, all effiminate gun loathers. The Femonazis step all over their Lib Girleymen, and practically piss on their heads, that is why they like strong Conservative men better.

Now you're an expert on "golden showers", huh?
 
Since you see-sesh, KKK'ers and Koch brother followers love the constitution so much maybe you should look up what 'a well regulated militia' means.
'regulated' when the framers wrote the constitution meant well trained and working, not government supervised. But you know this and refuse to acknowledge it like a good little statist.
 
'regulated' when the framers wrote the constitution meant well trained and working, not government supervised. But you know this and refuse to acknowledge it like a good little statist.

Who's going to train them? Who's going to pay for the training?

The original function of armories was to provide a protected location where local militia could gather and train, as well as store their arms and ammunition. The spaces usually contained a large open area to practice maneuvers, offices, classrooms, dining facilities, weapons storage, and other support operations.

Today, armories, sometimes referred to as readiness centers, are used by National Guard and military reserve units. Their primary function is still to provide spaces for training, administration, and material storage for the assigned military units. Armories are also utilized to respond to emergencies and support state disaster relief for floods, fires, snowstorms, tornados, water outages, etc. In addition they are often used as a local community resource to house social functions such as public meetings and sporting events.
http://www.wbdg.org/design/armories.php

Your vision of militias is traitorous.
Besides, we fought the war you and your international backers want in the 1860s and you lost.
 
Who's going to train them? Who's going to pay for the training?
I can believe that YOU are incapable of training yourself or your children, but most of us are not. I've trained myself very well.

The original function of armories was to provide a protected location where local militia could gather and train, as well as store their arms and ammunition. The spaces usually contained a large open area to practice maneuvers, offices, classrooms, dining facilities, weapons storage, and other support operations.

Today, armories, sometimes referred to as readiness centers, are used by National Guard and military reserve units. Their primary function is still to provide spaces for training, administration, and material storage for the assigned military units. Armories are also utilized to respond to emergencies and support state disaster relief for floods, fires, snowstorms, tornados, water outages, etc. In addition they are often used as a local community resource to house social functions such as public meetings and sporting events.
http://www.wbdg.org/design/armories.php
'militias' were 'we the people', not a government paid and sponsored unit of military members. That is what the 2nd Amendment protects, the right of 'we the people' to form militia units, made up of ourselves and not under the strict control of a central government.

Your vision of militias is traitorous.
Besides, we fought the war you and your international backers want in the 1860s and you lost.
If my vision of militias is traiterous, then why were they protected by the framers? why have presidents in the past, both republican and democrat, backed the civilian militias and the ideas of 'minutemen' to help protect freedom in this country? and wasn't your war in the 1860s about freeing the slaves and not stamping out militias? you seem extremely confused on the whole history of our nation and our constitution. where did you go to school?
 
Back
Top