American apathy and not wanting to fight for your country

SmarterthanYou said:
https://www.newsweek.com/american-military-recruitment-problems-public-apathy-1842449



the last couple of generations of Americans have been raised to be weak and cowardly. Maybe we do need a 3rd world war to weed out that apathy and weakness

1514597154612.jpg
Click to expand...

Let’s review the major wars after WWII.

Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq.

Wait! Not a fucking one of them was a declared war. “Conflicts”. “Police action”.

Two of them were started on outright lies. The Gulf of Tonkin and WMDs.

Korea. Still two nations, both with nuclear capability. Nothing solved there.

Vietnam. The North took over the South as soon as we left. 10 year war of wasted lives.

Afghanistan. Right back where it started.

Iraq. Another waste of American lives based on a lie.

So no, asswipe. Not weak or apathetic. Wary and suspicious.
 
domer76 said:
Let’s review the major wars after WWII.

Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq.

Wait! Not a fucking one of them was a declared war. “Conflicts”. “Police action”.

Two of them were started on outright lies. The Gulf of Tonkin and WMDs.

Korea. Still two nations, both with nuclear capability. Nothing solved there.

Vietnam. The North took over the South as soon as we left. 10 year war of wasted lives.

Afghanistan. Right back where it started.

Iraq. Another waste of American lives based on a lie.

So no, asswipe. Not weak or apathetic. Wary and suspicious.
Click to expand...

another weak man speaks out
 
domer76 said:
Let’s review the major wars after WWII.

Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq.

Wait! Not a fucking one of them was a declared war. “Conflicts”. “Police action”.

Two of them were started on outright lies. The Gulf of Tonkin and WMDs.

Korea. Still two nations, both with nuclear capability. Nothing solved there.

Vietnam. The North took over the South as soon as we left. 10 year war of wasted lives.

Afghanistan. Right back where it started.

Iraq. Another waste of American lives based on a lie.

So no, asswipe. Not weak or apathetic. Wary and suspicious.
Click to expand...

Well, yes it would be a waste of American lives, but STY MIGHT GET TO SHOOT A GUN!!!!!!!!!!!!

Totally worth it

:rofl2::rofl2::rofl2::rofl2:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
bless your heart. scared of guns, so you have to go with the penis references. it's almost like you're the small dicked one.
Click to expand...

I fired guns for a living for a decade, cocksucker. That’s when I realized how fucking useless they are in our society and why they should be restricted to the maximum the law allows.

Now, shitstain, go ahead and refute what I posted regarding the 4 “wars” since WWII.
 
domer76 said:
I fired guns for a living for a decade, cocksucker. That’s when I realized how fucking useless they are in our society and why they should be restricted to the maximum the law allows.
Click to expand...

you're full of shit, otherwise you would be demanding that government have no guns first. we all know that you hate the freedom of others and think all lowly civilians are incompetent, therefore might should rule the world, in your pathetic mindset
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you're full of shit, otherwise you would be demanding that government have no guns first. we all know that you hate the freedom of others and think all lowly civilians are incompetent, therefore might should rule the world, in your pathetic mindset
Click to expand...

Otherwise I “would” be? Who the fuck are you telling me what I would or would not be doing? You’re merely another two bit punk who thinks guns are something endowed by the creator of the universe.

And owner of the most absurd and laughable post in the history of this forum.
 
domer76 said:
Otherwise I “would” be? Who the fuck are you telling me what I would or would not be doing? You’re merely another two bit punk who thinks guns are something endowed by the creator of the universe.

And owner of the most absurd and laughable post in the history of this forum.
Click to expand...

you can keep being butthurt about getting embarrassed all the time, or accept the reality that your bias opinions and ideas are just wrong
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you can keep being butthurt about getting embarrassed all the time, or accept the reality that your bias opinions and ideas are just wrong
Click to expand...

Unless you’ve been in the military where you’ve witnessed active killing, you’re not in the same league with me, punk.

Ever been to an autopsy where the victim was shot 9 times in the head?
Ever witnessed a shotgun in the mouth suicide?
Or a .44 magnum forehead shot?
Ever bag a person’s brain just so they could be moved?

Yeah, I thought not.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
been there. next?



who hurt you?
Click to expand...

You know what hurts?

To watch the pathologist pull 9 bullets out of the brain of a mother of three. Killed at work trying to earn extra money to support her family.

To examine the stippling on a kid’s forehead to determine if it was a close contact wound from that .44 Magnum.

Bagging a guy’s brain after an argument with his drunken father-in-law who happen to have easy access to a gun.

But, to you, those people are acceptable collateral damage. Just because you have some needy attachment to an unnecessary inanimate object.
 
domer76 said:
You know what hurts?

To watch the pathologist pull 9 bullets out of the brain of a mother of three. Killed at work trying to earn extra money to support her family.

To examine the stippling on a kid’s forehead to determine if it was a close contact wound from that .44 Magnum.

Bagging a guy’s brain after an argument with his drunken father-in-law who happen to have easy access to a gun.

But, to you, those people are acceptable collateral damage. Just because you have some needy attachment to an unnecessary inanimate object.
Click to expand...

let me give you a reality check.........do you think that by taking all firearms, or finding some logical way to restrict them to only those that YOU deem worthy of carrying them, is going to save more lives or cost more lives, allow more crimes of gender violence, in other words do you believe that using YOUR version of society with very limited guns in the hands of civilians (because we already know you believe government never causes harm with their guns) that these types of violent crimes are NEVER going to happen?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
let me give you a reality check.........do you think that by taking all firearms, or finding some logical way to restrict them to only those that YOU deem worthy of carrying them, is going to save more lives or cost more lives, allow more crimes of gender violence, in other words do you believe that using YOUR version of society with very limited guns in the hands of civilians (because we already know you believe government never causes harm with their guns) that these types of violent crimes are NEVER going to happen?
Click to expand...

Here’s the fucking reality, dimwit.

Countries with more restrictive gun laws, which are ALL of them in the industrialized countries, have a much lower rate of gun violence. Period. Bar none.

That’s the fucking truth, Jethro, whether you like it or not.

Now, nobody has ever claimed those types of violent crimes would NEVER happen. That’s you making shit up to try to bolster your weak argument. But the track records of ALL OTHER first world countries proves my point and blows the shit out of yours.
 
domer76 said:
Here’s the fucking reality, dimwit.

Countries with more restrictive gun laws, which are ALL of them in the industrialized countries, have a much lower rate of gun violence. Period. Bar none.

That’s the fucking truth, Jethro, whether you like it or not.

Now, nobody has ever claimed those types of violent crimes would NEVER happen. That’s you making shit up to try to bolster your weak argument. But the track records of ALL OTHER first world countries proves my point and blows the shit out of yours.
Click to expand...

that is you wanting/needing to ignore the reality that your argument is weak and leaves the weaker of society vulnerable to the stronger. maybe that's what you want though, so you can more easily take advantage of weaker women.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
that is you wanting/needing to ignore the reality that your argument is weak and leaves the weaker of society vulnerable to the stronger. maybe that's what you want though, so you can more easily take advantage of weaker women.
Click to expand...

Just as I thought. You can’t refute the truth of my claim, so you resort to irrelevant babbling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top