Oh sure, attack the source, not the fact. Google it yourself. Merrick Garland did not vote against Heller in the DC court of appeals. He voted to have the whole court hear the case. Look it up your self or believe the NRA's smear campaign and not the facts.
You better get a link for that Mott.
Wacko's google finger is broken.
what is your case against media matters wack
I don't think primary voters have really thought this through. They're voting to stick it to the GOP & the system, but that "statement" will have ramifications for a long, long time.
Trump simply can't win a general election. This is setting up to be just like the Goldwater election, and chances are that Republicans will lose the Senate also. It's a disaster for conservatism.
What this means in practical terms is a Supreme Court that will tilt left for decades, and little to no action on the debt crisis. Nothing will change in the next 4 years.
Such a drag. Hillary is a weak candidate, but she'll beat Trump handily, with as little enthusiasm from most voters as we've seen in years. And the GOP had very good candidates to choose from. They blew it.
And Trump will never run. And he will never disclose his financials. And those things he said about wetbacks will tank his campaign. And he'll never be able to beat Jeb Bush.
You REALLY think you own a crystal ball here? I think someone just sold you a large marble and a magnifying glass.
So media matters tells the truth and yourblackworld doesn't. Feel free to explain that Rune and Desh.
They tell the truth.
Republicans hate the truth.
Media Matters tells the truth?
Are you back on the crystal meth?
Dude, reading is fundamental
He darned well might. He certainly has the right too. That was my point.Uh dude, Bush pulled her less than a month after he nominated her and before she ever went through confirmation hearings. VERY different scenario. His own party rebeled against him. Dems aren't rebelling against this selection. Obama is not going to pull his own nominee after fighting to get him a hearing.
And reading LIES is just plain retarded.
Well don't believe everything you read on Twitter.Yeah I will attack Media Matters. If that is the only source claiming something I'd suggest you'd wait for something better to appear.
And English my man, I said that's what I saw claimed on Twitter. I'm not here making or selling that argument.
He darned well might. He certainly has the right too. That was my point.
If you don't like a source use another you feel is objective. I just clicked on the first link that popped up and verified that the smear on Garland on guns/Heller decision, wasn't true.So media matters tells the truth and yourblackworld doesn't. Feel free to explain that Rune and Desh.
If you don't like a source use another you feel is objective. I just clicked on the first link that popped up and verified that the smear on Garland on guns/Heller decision, wasn't true.
You don't understand what I'm saying. He still has two months after the election. He could pull Garlands nomination and nominate someone significantly more Liberal than Merrick Garland and still have them, theoretically, confirmed before Clinton would be inaugurated.Ok, he has the right but he's not going to do it because Hillary might choose someone more liberal.