America faces a Cold War, this time, it's Domestic Communism

Libhater said:
Posting the author's name below the post is somehow considered to be a rule violation? Wow, you and that idiot
who continues to embarrass himself by sporting the moniker of America's worst-failed bidenpresident have once
again failed to accept the factual content of the OP. Its what you fools do most every time. But isn't that the core
agenda of everyone who supports and or is a true communist like bernie sanders, is to change the subject to fit
your sick anti American ideology? And yes, unlike all communists, I'm a Christian.
Click to expand...
It’s is a rule you site your source, thank you.
 
Libhater said:
There's a great book titled 'Blacklisted by History....author: Stanton Evans, that goes into detail into his 6 years of intensive research reveals that there was this relentless communist drive by Moscow spymasters and their agents in the United States to penetrate our government, influence its policies, and steal its secrets. US officials supposedly guarding against this danger not only let it happen but actively covered up the penetration. All of this was precisely as Joe McCarthy contented. Evans shows that practically everything we've been told about McCarthy is false, including conventional treatment of the famous 1950 speech in West Virginia where the Senate casually dismissed McCarthy charges, and much more.

This book in essence reminds us of, and is quite similar to the democrat cover-ups of the biden crime syndicate where the commies go unblemished for their crimes, while patriotic Republicans like Trump and McCarthy get blacklisted by the criminal coverups and lies by the democrat party.
Click to expand...

Thanks, poor Marty is industrial strength naive.
 
Many see that Putin knew how easy it would be to capture Trump. Such simple things as telling him over and over how great he is and offering him money and women. He was targeted a long time ago and it worked so well. Of course, catching him in sexual deviation is also useful. The pee tapes are real. That is why Trump sucked up to Putin for 4 years.
 
Nordberg said:
Many see that Putin knew how easy it would be to capture Trump. Such simple things as telling him over and over how great he is and offering him money and women. He was targeted a long time ago and it worked so well. Of course, catching him in sexual deviation is also useful. The pee tapes are real. That is why Trump sucked up to Putin for 4 years.
Click to expand...
I wonder why Putin has targeted Graham? Why single him out? Did he break a deal?
 
Libhater said:
Yes it is, but does anyone believe that leftists here or anywhere are able to process the undeniable democrat communism that has infiltrated
almost every part of the American landscape? I say NO! They (democrat communists) are America's #1 enemy by far.
Click to expand...


The Reich - that is democrats, are the most serious threat America has ever faced.

America will survive - OR democrats will survive as a party/political movement.

Not both.
 
Nordberg said:
Many see that Putin knew how easy it would be to capture Trump.
Click to expand...
He didn't. Hallucination.
Nordberg said:
Such simple things as telling him over and over how great he is and offering him money and women.
Click to expand...
He didn't. Hallucination.
Nordberg said:
He was targeted a long time ago and it worked so well.
Click to expand...
Never happened. Hallucination.
Nordberg said:
Of course, catching him in sexual deviation is also useful.
Click to expand...
Never happened. Hallucination.
Nordberg said:
The pee tapes are real.
Click to expand...
Hallucination.
Nordberg said:
That is why Trump sucked up to Putin for 4 years.
Click to expand...
Hallucination.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
The Reich - that is democrats, are the most serious threat America has ever faced.

America will survive - OR democrats will survive as a party/political movement.

Not both.
Click to expand...

Which is why civil war is inevitable. It's only a matter of time. I hoped it could've been avoided. I don't see how that can happen now.

Democrats will start it, conservatives will finish it.
 
Libhater said:
There's a great book titled 'Blacklisted by History....author: Stanton Evans, that goes into detail into his 6 years of intensive research reveals that there was this relentless communist drive by Moscow spymasters and their agents in the United States to penetrate our government, influence its policies, and steal its secrets. US officials supposedly guarding against this danger not only let it happen but actively covered up the penetration. All of this was precisely as Joe McCarthy contented. Evans shows that practically everything we've been told about McCarthy is false, including conventional treatment of the famous 1950 speech in West Virginia where the Senate casually dismissed McCarthy charges, and much more.

This book in essence reminds us of, and is quite similar to the democrat cover-ups of the biden crime syndicate where the commies go unblemished for their crimes, while patriotic Republicans like Trump and McCarthy get blacklisted by the criminal coverups and lies by the democrat party.
Click to expand...

Stone tried to defend himself by saying that he'd read M. Stanton Evans' book "Blacklisted by History," and found it "a more balanced review of exactly what McCarthy was talking about and what he did." That didn't make much sense either: Evans' book is a revisionist attempt to defend McCarthy, which is widely maligned by serious historians. It's not surprising that a longtime Republican operative would read it — but then, if Stone was on McCarthy's side, why was he accusing other people of "new McCarthyism"?

https://www.salon.com/2021/08/29/jo...nald-trump-now-leads-the-movement-he-created/


But it is unlikely that Evans' full-throated, frequently overzealous attempt to contextualize McCarthy's charges will convince anyone but Birch Society dead-enders.

https://reason.com/2008/02/14/mccarthy-and-his-friends/
 
Libhater said:
Originally Posted by martin View Post
Uh huh:

"Reviewing the book for The New York Times, American historian David Oshinsky, who also wrote a book on McCarthy in 1983, was harshly critical, calling Evans' primary thesis a "remarkable fantasy," asserting that Evans has uncovered no fresh evidence and arguing that the evidence supports the view that communist spy networks in the United States had largely been dismantled by the time McCarthy started his campaign and that McCarthy was "a bit player in the battle against Communist subversion, a latecomer who turned a vital crusade into a political mud bath... The fiercely negative judgments of those who lived through the McCarthy era are widely accepted today for good reason: they ring true."[1]

Kirkus Reviews called the book "[a] revisionist biography", which, although a "detailed account", is "marred by ideological blinders" and fit "[f]or true believers only",[2] Publishers Weekly described Evans as "given to conspiracy thinking"[3] and Reason magazine described the book as "revisionist" and "a breathless defense of McCarthy."[4]"
Wikipedia

When ideologues write about other ideologues not much worth the time of day comes from it.
Click to expand...




I don't know or care of who this david oshinsky guy is, but I did read Evan's detailed 605 page book that went into great detail as to how and why McCarthy was blacklisted by the senate commies et al. I doubt this david oshinsky guy ever read a book this long and this detailed on any particular subject of McCarthy, let alone on finding the many ways he (McCarthy) was subjected to a partisan crew of commie deniers that had infiltrated our government back in the late 40s and early 50s.
Click to expand...

Your proud, willful ignorance and MAGA myopia is fascinating to behold.
 
Phantasmal said:
It’s is a rule you site your source, thank you.
Click to expand...

I did site the source, it came from the author of it by John Green. It came as an op-ed from a local newspaper. Some people
here like this bidenpresident character always complains I don't use or I don't have a link to provide for my OPs. Well, these
op-eds I post don't have such a link, which is quite obvious to anyone reading op-eds. Sometimes I just quote someone that
has a book or has a piece from a magazine etc.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top