Am I correct, the Trumper’s now quietly admit

[LurchAddams]

I touch myself to photos of school bus fires <--- FIFY

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Once the fraudulent ballot is thrown in with the rest, there is no way to find it = why proactive prevention , such as positive voter ID, and updting voter rolls, etc., are more important than ever.

Once one fraudulent ballot is thrown in with 4 million other ballots it has no effect on the outcome of an election. Even 100 fraudulent ballots would have no effect on the outcome. ID doesn't prevent fraudulent voting. It is a panacea for idiots like you.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

I just gave you pages of examples and you gave NOTHING :rodl2:

You gave me pages of speculation. But you don't seem to understand the difference between that and actual facts.

Paxton's filing was a nothing burger. It went nowhere. It has nothing in it other than the same conspiracy bullshit that courts had rejected multiple times before.

 

[serenity]

People that don't vote aren't registered to vote. So your theory fails before we even get to the polling place. Then you ignore the fact that you would require thousands of these to make any change in the outcome. Not only that, you still ignore that such a scheme would require that all those volunteers do not know any of their neighbors.

Your ignorance of how the machines work doesn't prove anything other than your ignorance. First of all, the machines are all tested prior to the election for accuracy. How does your machine know which is the real election and which is the test for accuracy? Then your communications argument shows you don't know how the counting is done. Counting is done at each precinct. It is written down and multiple people check it. You are saying that the people that have a vested interest in one candidate would say nothing if the results later are different? The media is meaningless in the count since whatever the media reports doesn't affect the actual count. Then you ignore the fact that every election does an audit after the election to confirm the count. This is usually a random selection of different precincts that conducts full recounts the votes to confirm the accuracy.

I see you don't understand that paper ballots are not in cyberspace. The audit after the election often includes manual recounts of paper ballots.

Oops, you are simply delusional and think your delusions are reality.

I am not ignoring the universal natural algorithm at how mutual DNA results exist in series parallel time occupying space as relatively alive daily here in ever changing form that cannot create or destroy the universe evolving forward now as details never duplicate and total sum results are never same again.

You should read my thread in conspiracy theories forum on how to prove how your time alive is actually genetically eternally separated by your own heartbeat since conception.

 

[QP!]

...
Raffensberger was a RINO. He was no Trumper....

And yet he admits he has only voted for Trump and Republicans and not the democrat in all elections.

So your definition of a RINO is simple, 'agree with Trump on election fraud no matter if you run an investigation and find there was none... or you are a RINO'.

Which makes you ridiculous and stupid.

 

[TravisBickle]

 

[QP!]

View attachment 75463

Or why Trump supporters, in 2016 were either demanding the Vote counting be STOPPED or CONTINUED depending on if the State counted the mail in votes first or last.

In States were Mail in Votes were counted FIRST, the Trump supporters were demanding all vote continue to ensure they had time to catch up.