Alternative facts...We used to call them what they are... lies....

That's ridiculous .. but I'm sure you already know that.

The relative position the person is standing in would be part of the fact .. thus if you were standing facing each other and he went left, you saying he went right would not be factual. Keyword: 'He' The only way what you said would be factual is if you said 'he' went to MY right.

Thus, alternate truths cannot exist.

I'd like to point out my own genius .. but it didn't take genius to figure that out.

It's hysterical watching the desperate wordsmithing being done by partisan Trumpkins.
 
Multiple truths can exist.

Lets say you and I are standing facing each other. You decide to turn left and walk away.

You can declare you turned left.

And I can say you actually went right.

Both statements are correct. The important thing is context. You turned left relative to what? You turned right relative to what?

Thus, multiple truths can exist, depending on the frame of reference.

You've been blown the fuck out with my patented deep level analysis.

That does not change the truth about which way you turned, its simply an ambiguity in the language used to describe it.

The TRUTH remains that you turned the way you turned, regardless of if you called it left or right.
 
Back
Top