The alt-right lost in Austria.![]()
: ( true. I console myself with the fact that italy is the 3rd largest economy (at least thats what ive been told) in the eu and it was always going to be hard for austria who is like in the middle of the EU.
The alt-right lost in Austria.![]()
and then 3 days before the election you took it back you tard. You said "wait nope nevermind, no way."
You literally renounced your former comey post in your Nov. 5th post.
First I offered many things beyond just "trump has a chance." I outlined the many reasons why.. i.e. volatility, undecideds, lower minority turnout, hispanics stuff not being as big of a deal as you thought, hispanics being concentrated mostly in non-swing states, etc, you just skipped over them above.
Secondly, I don't care about "predictions" which is something you ROUTINELY keep missing. I have said over and over and over again my problem was with your retarded level of analysis. Sorry but when you throw 30% out the window, you are dumb. I spent a lot of time on this board trying to get people to understand that 30% is not a low number. It's a common problem - the vast majority of the public does not understand probability. I urge you to go to this site:
http://iop.harvard.edu/get-inspired...ference/campaign-president-managers-look-2016
Scroll down and look for the nate silver interview. It's 17 minutes long. Towards the end of the interview the interviewer tried conflating nate predicting clinton as an "overwhelming favorite" with other media's predictions and nate had to step in and say..."uh no, 70% is NOT an overwhelming favorite"...the point being, this is widespread ignorance of statistics and probability where people simply cannot conceptually understand what 30% means in their daily lives. I suspect many on here, including yourself, suffer from this. I talked about this often on here only to be ignored. I said his chances of winning were higher than the cubs coming back down 3-1.. ignored again.
I have no issue with someone saying clinton was the favorite, that was the correct analysis. The problem is you couldn't even do that. YOu ahd to say it was literally impossible for trump to win, IN SPITE of the evidence to the contrary.
So when you ignore easy to understand evidence and you keep making bold predictions that fall flat on their face, and then you KEEP DOING IT, you've gone crazy. It's that simple.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38204189
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38183118
globalist pm backed by obama and merkel resigns.
woot!
im not sure about the EU though i do think germany left greece and italy out to die during this refugee crisis. The euro however has been disastrously bad for the weaker european economies and i dont see how you can make a case otherwise. aving control over its own currency can only help italy.
Five Star movement is left wing and are probably going to make the most out of this. However, they are atypical for a left wing movement.
I was really taking Trump seriously after Comey. I backed off on election day because I saw some non-538 models that were much more favorable to Clinton. It was a dumb move to take them seriously. Nate Silver was always pretty bullish on Trump, moreover, he constantly aired his frustration about how poor quality the polling in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota was.
Honestly - and I don't mean to sound patronizing - but it definitely feels like the stupids have taken over.
It's a bummer for the intelligent.
It's definitely an "Empire Strikes Back" year.
But we all know that it ends with freedom, progressivism prevailing and muppets dancing.

Honestly - and I don't mean to sound patronizing - but it definitely feels like the stupids have taken over.
It's a bummer for the intelligent.

I haven't been wrong on anything. You just make up whatever you want.
You just have to understand Grind and his trolling, when he comes on here to rage against the machine it is probably because his mother made him attend a family function or go to church.![]()
You don't sound patronizing, you sond insipidly arrogant. The liberal hypocrisy has been illuminatedly exposed and kicked to the curb.
Clinton spent way too much time trying to pull off a landslide and turn Georgia when she should've spent all her time in her "firewall" (i.e. what turned out to be the actual swing states of this election) defending her turf. Did her internal polling even bother doing a poll of Wisconsin?
For months and months before the election myself and others were saying the Obama coalition wouldn't show up for Hillary like they did for Obama. And no coalition, no firewall.
How did so many people not see this coming? It's amazing Hillary's campaign would make a blunder of such magnitude [ignoring the firewall] and the only thing that explains it is they were living in a bubble.
In Italy, a grab for enormously more centralised power was defeated by conservatives and others. What on earth has this to do with the election of Trump and such?