All doomsday predictions of the first Earth Day in 1970 have turned out to be wrong

Into the Night said:
Pivot fallacy. Name dropping. Word stuffing. False authority fallacy. The CO2 coalition does not speak for C.P. Snow or anybody but themselves. Cut and pasting. Contextomy fallacy. Cutting and pasting is mindless. Form your own arguments and present them.
Click to expand...

Fuck off, I'm not going to listen to a fool who has a imbecilic grasp of thermodynamics, physics and chemistry. CP Snow, was talking about people like you, sadly you're far too vainglorious to get that.
 
Primavera said:
You believe in The Science, not the same thing.
Click to expand...
No such thing.
Primavera said:
What C.P. Snow failed to note,
Click to expand...
You still misquoting him?
Primavera said:
I think, is that the group he describes is actually aware of their scientific ignorance, and this leaves them very insecure.
Click to expand...
This describes the Church of Global Warming, and you.
Primavera said:
This accounts for their need for simple narratives, however wrong.
Click to expand...
Science really is very simple. It is just a set of falsifiable theories. You ignore three of them:
The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
Primavera said:
It allows them to believe that they actually do ‘understand’ the science, and, as we see, they become arrogantly proud of their alleged accomplishment.
Click to expand...
You believe your religion is science. It isn't.
Primavera said:
Of course, they forget that their ignorance extends to understanding what science actually is.
Click to expand...
Which describes you and the Church of Global Warming.
Primavera said:
They forget that the opposite of Science is ‘The Science’.
Click to expand...
There is no opposite of science.
Primavera said:
The situation is compounded when one comes to climate where most scientists are also ignorant,
Click to expand...
Science isn't scientists. It is not people at all. Climate is not a branch of science.
Primavera said:
but where their support for the narrative comforts the non-scientists.
Click to expand...
Are you describing climatologists? They are not scientists. They deny and discard science.
Primavera said:
On top of all this, I suspect that in a long period of wellbeing, this elite feels the need to show that they too have met challenges – even if the challenges are purely imaginary.
Click to expand...
And YOU think you are the elite.
Primavera said:
This seems particularly true for young people who are confronted with stories of the courage of the ‘greatest generation’.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-turned-out-to-be-wrong&p=5106798#post5106798
Click to expand...
Considering that the 'greatest generation' you refer to fought a world war, went through the depression caused by FDR, AND went to the Moon, yeah...it takes a lot of guts to do all that.
 
Into the Night said:
No such thing.

You still misquoting him?

This describes the Church of Global Warming, and you.

Science really is very simple. It is just a set of falsifiable theories. You ignore three of them:
The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You believe your religion is science. It isn't.

Which describes you and the Church of Global Warming.

There is no opposite of science.

Science isn't scientists. It is not people at all. Climate is not a branch of science.

Are you describing climatologists? They are not scientists. They deny and discard science.

And YOU think you are the elite.

Considering that the 'greatest generation' you refer to fought a world war, went through the depression caused by FDR, AND went to the Moon, yeah...it takes a lot of guts to do all that.
Click to expand...

You're not fit to lick Snow's boots!
 
Into the Night said:
Not an experiment. A random number generator or type randU.

Clouds do not need particles to form. Cosmic rays are not ions.

No such thing as artificial cosmic rays. Cosmic rays create muons and

Clouds do not need sulfuric acid to form. Sulfur is spelled with an 'f', not a 'ph'; unless you're in the UK.

Buzzword fallacy. There is no such thing as 'biogenic vapors'. 'Vapor' doesn't have a 'u' in it, unless you're in the UK.

Clouds do not need cosmic rays to form. All you need is a moisture source and convection. You are obviously not a meteorologist.

Random numbers are not data. Argument from randU fallacy.

Random numbers.

Sorry, dude. Using random numbers of type randU as data creates the argument from randU fallacy.

Clouds form from convective heat and a source of moisture. No radiation is needed. No particles are needed. Any time humidity is at 100%, a cloud will form. As temperature drops due to increasing altitude, humidity tends to increase. That's why clouds tend to have flat bottoms. It all happens at the same altitude. Even if there were no cosmic rays at all, clouds would still form the same way. Even if there were no particulates in the air at all, clouds will still form the same way.
Click to expand...

Stupid fucker, I'm British and we spell sulphur correctly. As for cosmic rays, once they hit the atmosphere they create muons, not that I'd expect you to know that!!

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41...s are everywhere,shower Earth from all angles.
 
Last edited:
Primavera said:
Stupid fucker, I'm British and we spell sulphur correctly.
Click to expand...

I thought you might be. You do not have any authority over the way any nation spells sulfur, dude. Omniscience fallacy.
The arrogance of the UK is still just as strong as ever.

An we still drive on the right side of the road, just to spite you guys.
 
leaningright said:
But you misspell words like color and tire. ;)

Great thread, BTW.
Click to expand...

They are considered correct in the UK. You'll also see these weird spellings in some of the former colonies, like Canada or Australia. The British still think they have an empire.

Patton once said that Britain and the U.S. are two nations separated by a common language.
 
Into the Night said:
I thought you might be. You do not have any authority over the way any nation spells sulfur, dude. Omniscience fallacy.
The arrogance of the UK is still just as strong as ever.

An we still drive on the right side of the road, just to spite you guys.
Click to expand...

Sensible countries like the UK, Japan, Thailand, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia drive on the left. Anyway you're the pompous arsehole that took issue with the spelling in the first place, shit for brains.
 
Into the Night said:
They are considered correct in the UK. You'll also see these weird spellings in some of the former colonies, like Canada or Australia. The British still think they have an empire.

Patton once said that Britain and the U.S. are two nations separated by a common language.
Click to expand...

My advice, when you're in a hole stop fucking digging!
 
Into the Night said:
They are considered correct in the UK. You'll also see these weird spellings in some of the former colonies, like Canada or Australia. The British still think they have an empire.

Patton once said that Britain and the U.S. are two nations separated by a common language.
Click to expand...

Patton was a pompous arrogant prick, just like you in fact!
 
Primavera said:

Behold the coming apocalypse as predicted on and around Earth Day, 1970:

1. “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” — Harvard biologist George Wald

2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.” — Washington University biologist Barry Commoner

3. “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.” — New York Times editorial

4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.” — Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich

5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born… [By 1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.” — Paul Ehrlich

6. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” — Denis Hayes, Chief organizer for Earth Day

7. “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions…. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.” — North Texas State University professor Peter Gunter

8. “In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half.” — Life magazine

9. “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt

10. “Air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” — Paul Ehrlich

11. “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate… that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, ‘Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, ‘I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt

12. “[One] theory assumes that the earth’s cloud cover will continue to thicken as more dust, fumes, and water vapor are belched into the atmosphere by industrial smokestacks and jet planes. Screened from the sun’s heat, the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born.” — Newsweek magazine

13. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” — Kenneth Watt

https://www.netzerowatch.com/earth-day-at-52-none-of-the-eco-doomsday-predictions-have-come-true/
Click to expand...

Actually, repukes are contemplating engaging in a doomsday event at being so far up tRump's and the devil's hide at not only being un American and uncivilized but should be considered corrupt to a subhuman nature at whoring it up and living it up on the taxpayer dime while waging war against the taxpayer and their well being. Yet, I have faith that God's U.S. Justice and the God Almighty as the alpha and the omega and the beginning and the end has the solution that will deal with His creation accordingly.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top