ALERT!!! Raving lunatic ALERT!!!

Alias said:
Who exactly "couldn't keep it in his pants"? Who are you speaking of?
Click to expand...

Darla's just on another one of her "rant-du-jours".
She gets up a head of steam, about something, and things just spew out of her mouth.

One time on the AOL boards, she thought the word "come" was meant to be "cum" and she went on a 5 day bitch fest over it.
 
Cornholio said:
The NRA can waive its right to enforce the confidentiality provisions without requiring the victims to do anything and without requiring the victims to waive their right to enforce the confidentiality provisions.
Click to expand...

There is no need for the NRA to do any such thing if the victims don't want this disclosed. Quit making excuses for this lunatic.

I wasn't commenting on Larry's actions. I was commenting on your statement about grabbing their photos.
Click to expand...

yeah, you were all innocent. Not trying to provide excuses at all. He grabbed their photos and put them up on his show and told his viewers to go boycott. He made those women targets.

That is beyond pathetic. The fact that others could individually have done so is irrelevant. He made sure the idea was in the head of his viewers. He made those women targets. So quit trying to justify your pathetic attempt to defend him.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Darla's just on another one of her "rant-du-jours".
She gets up a head of steam, about something, and things just spew out of her mouth.

One time on the AOL boards, she thought the word "come" was meant to be "cum" and she went on a 5 day bitch fest over it.
Click to expand...

Good ol' Tarzan!
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Darla's just on another one of her "rant-du-jours".
She gets up a head of steam, about something, and things just spew out of her mouth.

One time on the AOL boards, she thought the word "come" was meant to be "cum" and she went on a 5 day bitch fest over it.
Click to expand...


Looks like someone is still obsessed with Darla, perhaps this calls for another poll! Or whhhhhhaaaaaaa, close the thread!

Troll
 
Superfreak said:
There is no need for the NRA to do any such thing if the victims don't want this disclosed. Quit making excuses for this lunatic.
Click to expand...

Maybe you don't understand what I'm saying. If the victims don't want anything disclosed, nothing needs to be disclosed, even if the NRA waives its own enforcement of the confidentiality provision. Right now, the women cannot speak out if they want to. If the NRA waives enforcement of the confidentiality provision, the women can speak out if they want, but they do not have to.



Superfreak said:
yeah, you were all innocent. Not trying to provide excuses at all. He grabbed their photos and put them up on his show and told his viewers to go boycott. He made those women targets.

That is beyond pathetic. The fact that others could individually have done so is irrelevant. He made sure the idea was in the head of his viewers. He made those women targets. So quit trying to justify your pathetic attempt to defend him.
Click to expand...

I'm not defending him. I think what he did was outrageous, but it would be outrageous in the absence of the photos. In my view they don't add to the outrageousness of it at all. So quit being a douche and read what I write instead of what you want to see.
 
Rana said:
Looks like someone is still obsessed with Darla, perhaps this calls for another poll! Or whhhhhhaaaaaaa, close the thread!

Troll
Click to expand...

LOL Wah Close the Thread! We have to get an emoticon for that!

It looks like the IQ has dropped about 100 points on this thread. I'm sneaking out of the office early anyway, have a good weekend everyone! And anyone who doesn't have anything better to do this weekend but spend it here talking about me - you poor bastards! But have at it! ;)
 
Cornholio said:
Maybe you don't understand what I'm saying. If the victims don't want anything disclosed, nothing needs to be disclosed, even if the NRA waives its own enforcement of the confidentiality provision. Right now, the women cannot speak out if they want to. If the NRA waives enforcement of the confidentiality provision, the women can speak out if they want, but they do not have to.





I'm not defending him. I think what he did was outrageous, but it would be outrageous in the absence of the photos. In my view they don't add to the outrageousness of it at all. So quit being a douche and read what I write instead of what you want to see.
Click to expand...

Convince them to give back the money they received and I'm sure the agreement can be reversed.
 
Darla said:
O'Donnell is a rageaholic, but I don't see the problem here. When this agreement was made, Cain was the head of a stupid association. No one other than the principals cared. Now he is the front-runner for the Republican nomination for President of the United States.

Sure, I wanna know what happened here.

Also, his wife is a very attractive woman. Pretty disgusting that he couldn't keep it in his pants and even worse IMO, humiliated her by making advances towards women he worked with and who must have known her. But you know, that I expect. The harassment I'd like to know the details. According to contemporaneous accounts I have read, at least one of the women felt her job was on the line by saying no. That's a problem in the President of the United States. Or at least, I think it is. I feel some women may agree with me.
Click to expand...

Timeline.... When the agreement was made Cain was no longer the head of the NRA...

At this point we don't know what he supposedly said to make any women uncomfortable, assuming he was groping on women other than his wife is a bit much.
 
Darla said:
LOL Wah Close the Thread! We have to get an emoticon for that!

It looks like the IQ has dropped about 100 points on this thread. I'm sneaking out of the office early anyway, have a good weekend everyone! And anyone who doesn't have anything better to do this weekend but spend it here talking about me - you poor bastards! But have at it! ;)
Click to expand...

Yep, it is the weekend, and the trolls are moving in, so have a good one.

"the bird has flown the coop"
 
Cornholio said:
Maybe you don't understand what I'm saying. If the victims don't want anything disclosed, nothing needs to be disclosed, even if the NRA waives its own enforcement of the confidentiality provision. Right now, the women cannot speak out if they want to. If the NRA waives enforcement of the confidentiality provision, the women can speak out if they want, but they do not have to.
Click to expand...

On of the women may be issuing a statement today....But with limited details

http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/04/politics/cain-allegations/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Damocles said:
Timeline.... When the agreement was made Cain was no longer the head of the NRA...

At this point we don't know what he supposedly said to make any women uncomfortable, assuming he was groping on women other than his wife is a bit much.
Click to expand...

Really, a bit much, I could see him with a few drinks, hanging out with his young associates, thinking he was "hot stuff", crossing that line.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cornholio said:
Maybe you don't understand what I'm saying. If the victims don't want anything disclosed, nothing needs to be disclosed, even if the NRA waives its own enforcement of the confidentiality provision. Right now, the women cannot speak out if they want to. If the NRA waives enforcement of the confidentiality provision, the women can speak out if they want, but they do not have to.
Click to expand...

right now, the women can talk to the NRA if they want and express their interest. You and your boy Larry stomping your feet demanding the NRA do what you want them to do is pathetic. You have no idea if the NRA has been approached by these women or not. You and your boy Larry are setting up the women at the NRA as targets. Do you understand this moron?

I'm not defending him. I think what he did was outrageous, but it would be outrageous in the absence of the photos. In my view they don't add to the outrageousness of it at all. So quit being a douche and read what I write instead of what you want to see.
Click to expand...

Right. Not defending him. Just saying it was no big deal that he posted their photo's because they were easy to get. Just saying the NRA should just release the women (which by the way puts all the pressure then on the women) from their confidentiality agreement without knowing anything about what the women want. But keep on defending your boy Larry. We know you can't help but defend one of your Dem masters.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Convince them to give back the money they received and I'm sure the agreement can be reversed.
Click to expand...

They shouldn't have to give the money back. That is just nonsense. The factors have changed significantly by Cain's running for President. That should be accounted for and if Cain doesn't have anything to hide, he should get the NRA to grant the release IF the women request it.
 
Superfreak said:
They shouldn't have to give the money back. That is just nonsense. The factors have changed significantly by Cain's running for President. That should be accounted for and if Cain doesn't have anything to hide, he should get the NRA to grant the release IF the women request it.
Click to expand...

Since the Liberals are tying the severence pay (amount given) to the agreement, why shouldn't they have to give the money back; that is if it was really part of the agreement and this entire thing is just one big bitch and moan contest.
 
Superfreak said:
right now, the women can talk to the NRA if they want and express their interest. You and your boy Larry stomping your feet demanding the NRA do what you want them to do is pathetic. You have no idea if the NRA has been approached by these women or not. You and your boy Larry are setting up the women at the NRA as targets. Do you understand this moron?
Click to expand...

I'm not setting up anyone as a target. I know that one woman's attorney has approached the NRA and I know that the woman is releasing an NRA approved statement, which sounds to me like the NRA is not waiving the confidentiality provisions.


Superfreak said:
Right. Not defending him. Just saying it was no big deal that he posted their photo's because they were easy to get. Just saying the NRA should just release the women (which by the way puts all the pressure then on the women) from their confidentiality agreement without knowing anything about what the women want. But keep on defending your boy Larry. We know you can't help but defend one of your Dem masters.
Click to expand...

I always defend people by calling their conduct outrageous. You really got me here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top