Alaska nominee says sex outside of marriage should be illegal

tom prendergast said:
So what about when she was describing Christie as a crotch sniffer is that irrelevant as well?
Click to expand...

Or when you were calling us cunts or suggesting another woman was doing sailors...that too? I have never claimed that I have an empty sack of rocks to throw or that I have never threw any...but do stop pretending as if I threw the first one.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Level of censorship? How about just applying the rules? You totally fucking suck. The point is the picture was nude and it was accompanied by the statement I'd do her doggy style"...totally in breaking with rule 12. SCOTUS ruling was on hard core porn... you're now, without a doubt, subjective rules...do not make clear anything other than: 12.-No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.
Click to expand...

She's got a point there Damo. Rule 12 says "no porn", not "only soft porn".

Man-up and spank 3D. :)
 
Ice Dancer said:
Since you, being a man, have little knowledge of what it is to be a woman-you have very little cred on the subject. To continually, as 3-d does, post half nude to completely nude women who are being used to discuss what he'd "do to them", is sexist and demeaning to women. That said, he does so with the complete support of the mods- so I must just be a good little woman and STFU... so be it. That does not however mean for a second that the picture(s) are not both pornographic and sexist..
Click to expand...

I have plenty of credibility on the subject considering I have lived with women for over 30 years. From one actually stating she didn't like sex (in general, with anyone, I might add) to my current wife who has declined fewer times than I can count on one hand over the last 14 years. A woman whom, one day last summer, came outside shortly after I had cut the lawn and suggested we shower together at 11 am!

The point? Some women do not have sexual hang-ups.

As I mentioned before when 3-D states what he'd like to "do to them" it is not to be taken as some form of punishment. He just may meet someone who is thrilled to be a participant. Simply stated the gal may be ecstatic 3-D is willing to "doggy style her into the next time zone".

Lastly, no one is suggesting you STFU. It seems to me the only thing some people are doing is saying there is a difference between you finding the pictures sexist and degrading vs the pictures actually being sexist and degrading. As I noted previously there are still people who find the sight of a mother feeding her child to be objectionable. How can anyone possibly find such a caring, natural act to be anything but a caring, natural act?

It truly boggles the mind how warped our society has become.
 
tom prendergast said:
So what about when she was describing Christie as a crotch sniffer is that irrelevant as well?
Click to expand...

No it wasn't. ID and I have had some hostile discussions about some things she has said as well.

But she was taking a cheap shot at a person with whom she has a running feud. You were trying to say someone who has had several spouses cannot be prim & proper. I see a difference, even if you do not.
 
Damn Yankee said:
She's got a point there Damo. Rule 12 says "no porn", not "only soft porn".

Man-up and spank 3D. :)
Click to expand...

pun intended? are you into fetishes?

btw, i will defend 3D and state he has never posted porn on this site. while there is no bright line definition of porn, it has been fairly established in our courts what could and does constitute porn.
 
apple0154 said:
I have plenty of credibility on the subject considering I have lived with women for over 30 years. From one actually stating she didn't like sex (in general, with anyone, I might add) to my current wife who has declined fewer times than I can count on one hand over the last 14 years. A woman whom, one day last summer, came outside shortly after I had cut the lawn and suggested we shower together at 11 am!

The point? Some women do not have sexual hang-ups.

As I mentioned before when 3-D states what he'd like to "do to them" it is not to be taken as some form of punishment. He just may meet someone who is thrilled to be a participant. Simply stated the gal may be ecstatic 3-D is willing to "doggy style her into the next time zone".

Lastly, no one is suggesting you STFU. It seems to me the only thing some people are doing is saying there is a difference between you finding the pictures sexist and degrading vs the pictures actually being sexist and degrading. As I noted previously there are still people who find the sight of a mother feeding her child to be objectionable. How can anyone possibly find such a caring, natural act to be anything but a caring, natural act?

It truly boggles the mind how warped our society has become.
Click to expand...

No the only people...as in men, are suggesting that what 3d does is not sexist and degrading...it is.
 
King of Hoops said:
Hugh Hefner has obsessed over getting laid for over 50 years. Is he still a virgin?
Click to expand...

No, he's just an old wrinkled fart sitting around in a stained satin smoking jacket who will need a daily dose of Viagra til the day he dies still thinking he's got something that resembles "game".
 
Ice Dancer said:
Right Tom..pretend that's what is being said..
Click to expand...

You probably think this is pornographic.

vasectomy.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top