Alan Dershowitz rips his own party apart

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Dershowitz



Dershowitz has been involved in several legal cases and is a commentator on the Arab–Israeli conflict.[6] As a criminal appellate lawyer, he has won 13 of the 15 murder and attempted murder cases he has handled,[7] and has represented a series of celebrity clients, including Mike Tyson, Patty Hearst, and Jim Bakker. His most notable cases include his role in 1984 in overturning the conviction of Claus von Bülow for the attempted murder of his wife, Sunny, and as the appellate adviser for the defense in the O.*J. Simpson murder trial in 1995.[8]
 
evince said:
yes hes wrong


who has he defended in the past assmunch
Click to expand...

How is who he defended in the past relevant here?

What would be more relevant would be for you to cite the statute that states it is illegal to communicate with Russians. I want an actual law that was broken.

You see that was ALWAYS the standard you lefties used for the Clintons so it is only right to apply it to Trump
 
he knows its shit fool


he is trolling for a big time job and great big money stupid fuck


trumpy


Pense


jarod


hell any one of them would be BIG BUCKS
 
Thing1 said:
Obstruction worked for the GOP - bigly.

As to the claim that collusion isn't criminal behavior, does anyone really want to go w/ that line of defense if it turns out Trump or any of his team DID collude w/ Russia? Really? A major party candidate could seek to gain advantage through one of America's adversaries, and everyone would be okay w/ that because it isn't technically a crime?
Click to expand...

Russia is not my adversary. They've done nothing to me. No different than having Merkel or someone back hillary clinton.
 
Thing1 said:
Obstruction worked for the GOP - bigly.

As to the claim that collusion isn't criminal behavior, does anyone really want to go w/ that line of defense if it turns out Trump or any of his team DID collude w/ Russia? Really? A major party candidate could seek to gain advantage through one of America's adversaries, and everyone would be okay w/ that because it isn't technically a crime?
Click to expand...

It was your line of defense for all Hillarys actions. Why the double standard?

Why are you so afraid of Russia?

Do you think they are going to attack us tomorrow?
 
I Love America said:
It was your line of defense for all Hillarys actions. Why the double standard?

Why are you so afraid of Russia?

Do you think they are going to attack us tomorrow?
Click to expand...

Hillary? You mean the candidate I didn't support & didn't vote for?

Russia isn't an enemy, but they're also not an ally. They also have a pretty effed upway of handling things in general. Personally, I don't want to see them or any world power interfere w/ our elections.

But, your support of that is noted.
 
evince said:
see

NO REAL AMERICAN would deny all 17 intel angencies in the USA



these posters are not Americans
Click to expand...

First of all, 17 agencies did not come out all indepdently and say that. It was one guy speaking on BEHALF of those agencies.

The evidence they have is spurious. It is literally childs play to fake the origins and fingerprints of the things they are talking about. On a jr. level people do it on JPP everyday when they use VPNs to hide their IP's. With regards to russia obviously things are more advanced and we aren't talking about IP's, but when it comes to certain programs utilized or maybe a particular exploits used, such things can easily be found and bought on the dark web. Furthermore our intel agencies have been open about their own capabilities of faking origins of "attacks" and their desire to do so in various situations. Lastly our intel agencies make a habit of lying to the american people about their activities. They have lied under oath to congress about domestic spying. They always lie and don't give a fuck about us. Their word isn't worth dogshit to me.

Go look up Operation Northwoods to see what our intel and military industrial complex is capable of coming up with.
 
Thing1 said:
Hillary? You mean the candidate I didn't support & didn't vote for?

Russia isn't an enemy, but they're also not an ally. They also have a pretty effed upway of handling things in general. Personally, I don't want to see them or any world power interfere w/ our elections.

But, your support of that is noted.
Click to expand...

you would rather be kept in the dark with regards to corruption of our candidates. You would rather not know the full truth. You think our democracy is better if the public simply didn't know about the nefarious actions of our candidates. To be better informed is a bad thing, solely because you may not like the source.

A more informed citizenry will always be better for democracy, not worse.

Democrats wanted people in the dark and they are mad people received more information to make their decision.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top