Alan Dershowitz asks, "What's the crime?": Liberals apparently have no answer

Alan Dershowitz asks, "What's the crime?": Liberals apparently have no answer


I've been asking this and no liberal has been able to answer.

Here is your chance.
 
liberals have gone full retard. Been saying it for a month now. JPP has just become a circlejerk of retards that have no knowledge of politics.
 
liberals have gone full retard. Been saying it for a month now. JPP has just become a circlejerk of retards that have no knowledge of politics.

I would have disagreed with you a few months ago when I joined, but your statement is evidently true.

Like Thingy says, this is the time for hysteria and he supports hysteria. Which of course is a mental disorder.
 
Maybe I'll play devils advocate lol.

The only crime they have a prayer of nailing Trump with is obstruction of justice. Collusion not only lacks evidence---it's not a federal crime. I never thought about that.

But if that's true, Mueller is wasting his time investigating it, since he can't bring an indictment even if there was collusion. In fact, he may even be out of bounds looking for evidence of something that is not a federal crime.

His role is federal prosecutor and not a private eye.

This raises the possibility that Trump threw them a curve ball with appointing a SP. It's going to be at least somewhat of a reprieve. I read somewhere that Mueller is asking that congress no longer hold public hearings on it. That's not so good news for the anti-Trump hacks because it's going to keep the issue out of the news and make it harder to impede Trump's agenda.

Also, as Dershowitz pointed out, it may even stop the leaks since Mueller will probably run a tight ship. I'm fairly convinced the leaks are coordinated to come out in a timely fashion.

I would love to know who is behind it.
 

I've been asking this and no liberal has been able to answer.

Here is your chance.
What was the crime when Clinton had consensual sex with an intern? Answer that, and you are on the beginning of your journey to enlightenment Grasshopper.
 
Someone explain to Dershowitz as well as the sniveling Trumptards around here, that the reason for an investigation is to find out if there was a crime. If it is found that a crime or crimes was/were committed, then the answer to your question will be evident.
 
Someone explain to Dershowitz as well as the sniveling Trumptards around here, that the reason for an investigation is to find out if there was a crime. If it is found that a crime or crimes was/were committed, then the answer to your question will be evident.

Maybe in your statist hovels of the former Soviet Union. But not in the United States.

Think about what you are saying and the implications.

"We don't know if there is a crime but we are going to go look to see if we can find one"

You should be shot
 
Maybe I'll play devils advocate lol.

The only crime they have a prayer of nailing Trump with is obstruction of justice. Collusion not only lacks evidence---it's not a federal crime. I never thought about that.
That's correct about trump...thus far. But the investigation already has, and will continue to expose crimes perpetrated by his staff. To date, Manafort/Flynn are screwed....the latter much more than the former.

Kushner is next.

But if that's true, Mueller is wasting his time investigating it, since he can't bring an indictment even if there was collusion. In fact, he may even be out of bounds looking for evidence of something that is not a federal crime.

His role is federal prosecutor and not a private eye.

This raises the possibility that Trump threw them a curve ball with appointing a SP. It's going to be at least somewhat of a reprieve. I read somewhere that Mueller is asking that congress no longer hold public hearings on it. That's not so good news for the anti-Trump hacks because it's going to keep the issue out of the news and make it harder to impede Trump's agenda.

Also, as Dershowitz pointed out, it may even stop the leaks since Mueller will probably run a tight ship. I'm fairly convinced the leaks are coordinated to come out in a timely fashion.

I would love to know who is behind it.
Many leaks are coming directly from trump, who believes he's throwing more smoke into the process. Sadly, he has the attention span of a gnat, so he never thinks through his actions before creating another nail in his coffin.

The other leaks are coming from his staff, who have grown disgusted with the way he conducts the business of running the country. They are patriots who realize the danger of having an adolescent run things.
 
Someone explain to Dershowitz as well as the sniveling Trumptards around here, that the reason for an investigation is to find out if there was a crime. If it is found that a crime or crimes was/were committed, then the answer to your question will be evident.

SP stands for special *prosecutor*.

What you are describing is a witch hunt or something that would be done by a two bit private eye hired by a paranoid spouse.
 
That's correct about trump...thus far. But the investigation already has, and will continue to expose crimes perpetrated by his staff. To date, Manafort/Flynn are screwed....the latter much more than the former.

Kushner is next.

Many leaks are coming directly from trump, who believes he's throwing more smoke into the process. Sadly, he has the attention span of a gnat, so he never thinks through his actions before creating another nail in his coffin.

The other leaks are coming from his staff, who have grown disgusted with the way he conducts the business of running the country. They are patriots who realize the danger of having an adolescent run things.

Some of it could possibly be intentional by Trump, since you can systematically role out leakers by knowing who was/wasn't present when something was said.

But like virtually everything with Collusion Gate---it's speculation.

Thus far lol...there's no evidence of collusion. How long should democrats push it? It will always play well with the faithful, but don't you worry about independents? How long before they conclude that democrats are unjustifiably trying to take down a president?

The term for that is 'soft coup'. Don't you need them to get the WH back?
 
What was the crime when Clinton had consensual sex with an intern? Answer that, and you are on the beginning of your journey to enlightenment Grasshopper.
Yet if had been a Republican president you can be damn sure that you'd claim it was grooming.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
That's correct about trump...thus far. But the investigation already has, and will continue to expose crimes perpetrated by his staff. To date, Manafort/Flynn are screwed....the latter much more than the former.

Kushner is next.

Many leaks are coming directly from trump, who believes he's throwing more smoke into the process. Sadly, he has the attention span of a gnat, so he never thinks through his actions before creating another nail in his coffin.

The other leaks are coming from his staff, who have grown disgusted with the way he conducts the business of running the country. They are patriots who realize the danger of having an adolescent run things.
You mean the staff he inherited from Obama, Trump definitely needs to clean out the Augean stables.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
What was the crime when Clinton had consensual sex with an intern? Answer that, and you are on the beginning of your journey to enlightenment Grasshopper.

none.......it was the perjury that fucked him over, not the fucking.......by the way, I notice you didn't answer Dershowitz' question.....
 
That's correct about trump...thus far. But the investigation already has, and will continue to expose crimes perpetrated by his staff. To date, Manafort/Flynn are screwed....the latter much more than the former.

Kushner is next.

so what you're saying is that there aren't any crimes so far, but you hope to find some......
 
What was the crime when Clinton had consensual sex with an intern? Answer that, and you are on the beginning of your journey to enlightenment Grasshopper.

Lying to a federal grand jury, duh. American sprinter Marion Jones did a couple years in a federal prison for the very same thing.
 
Lying to a federal grand jury, duh. American sprinter Marion Jones did a couple years in a federal prison for the very same thing.

Martha Stewart, Scooter Libby, weren't there some baseball players in trouble over it?.....and some that haven't been prosecuted yet.....like Hilliary......
 
Martha Stewart, Scooter Libby, weren't there some baseball players in trouble over it?.....and some that haven't been prosecuted yet.....like Hilliary......

Yeah, I don't know. She (Marion) lied about taking steroids because she didn't want them to know. Bill lied because he didn't want them to know he was playing cigar games with women other than his wife.

Everybody lies for a reason. When you lie to a federal grand jury it's a felony.
 
Maybe in your statist hovels of the former Soviet Union. But not in the United States.

Think about what you are saying and the implications.

"We don't know if there is a crime but we are going to go look to see if we can find one"

You should be shot

In America, when there is the appearance of possible wrong doing by a govt official, it gets investigated.

You should be shot just for being an idiot.

Idiot.
 
SP stands for special *prosecutor*.

What you are describing is a witch hunt or something that would be done by a two bit private eye hired by a paranoid spouse.

Trump and his campaign helped create the appearance of possible wrong doing.

So now they get investigated. That's the way we do things in America.

You and your Trumptard accomplices not being real or true Americans, wouldn't understand that.

When Democrats are in power, scumbag wing nuts are all for investigating everything​, but when your precious Repugnants are in, all investigations are witch hunts.

Yadda yadda yadda.

Don't like it?

CRY HARDER!!!!!
 
Back
Top