AGW and belief in God

[Rune]

bullshit, you raped the oceans of their resources, you greedy motherfucker

Prove it

 

[Ass Man]

Prove it

that is what commercial fishing is dumbass, you are no different than the japanese whalers, cunt

 

[Bigdog]

Al Gorians don't want you to look at the oceans or the land, they only want you to foucs on the sky.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Try a dictionary if you don't know what a comparison is fool.

It is not a valid comparison at all. Perhaps you should get a dictionary.

Thanks for backing off another lie that you banned me, rocket scientist, lol.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Prove it

As you always say, prove him wrong.

Poor Rune.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

What is the strawman, cunt?
If we are taking about saving the planet everybody is obligated to pay.

The planet is not doomed.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I banned you from this thread.

I am just making a comparison retard.

No you didn't, on both points.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

More lies, you didn't ban me.

Great intelligent response though, way to let that intelligence shine through, LOL. Your comparison is retarded and no surprise you can't defend it or explain it, just like your lie about having a patent pending.

Lemme guess, you're mad because I proved you lied about your patent pending so you're now going to pout and thread ban me.

oooooooooooooh, poor Rune.

If he had; then Domer would have said Rune was a pussy, like he's classified Grind and Christie.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I fish sustainably idiot

Bullshit

You fish for profit.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

If he had; then Domer would have said Rune was a pussy, like he's classified Grind and Christie.

Doubt it, he would pull a Zappas and only say certain people are cowards, despite saying anyone who thread bans is a coward.

 

[Bigdog]

Shark finning is doing much more damage to the planet than the Goracle's invisible skygod, Seeotu.

 

[Rune]

Shark finning is doing much more damage to the planet than the Goracle's invisible skygod, Seeotu.

Relevance?

 

[cancel2 2022]

NOAA has finally been rumbled, heads should roll for this.

They played fast and loose with the figures -NOAA whistleblower

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/02...pausebuster-paper-was-hyped-broke-procedures/

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

 

[sear]

"Would a logical person choose not to believe in God?" R #1 P #1

There is no burden of disproof.

It is up to the theists, the religionists to prove their case.
They've had millennia to do so.
So far, what have they got? A few ancient storybooks?

"If there is no God very nothing lost.
If there is a God enternal salvation."

You have approximated PASCAL'S WAGER.

If there is a punitive god, professing faith entitles eternal sanctuary. If not, having professed such faith has no eternal penalty. Pascal's metaphysical cost / benefit analysis concludes: faith merits over atheism in the proportion eternity towers over a single lifetime.

But as Richfrog @LL observes, Pascal's Wager is not an argument for the existence of a god.
Instead it's an argument for coerced, cowardly hypocrisy.

I personally would rather stand upright with pride in eternal Hell than to cower in shame in Heaven.

"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear." Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), U.S. president. Letter, 10 Aug. 1787.

"Believe nothing,
No matter where you read it,
Or who has said it,
Not even if I have said it,
Unless it agrees with your own reason
And your own common sense." Buddha

Then R #1 posits:

"The same is true if every single solar cell fights AGW or not.
Yet you fools put your faith in the very small minority of paid shills at risk of losing the Earth ." R #1

You COMPLETELY lost me on that one. I see not even a tenuous connection.

"If we are taking about saving the planet everybody is obligated to pay." R #3

I question your "saving the planet" phrasing. Saving humanity would seem the more realistic description.

"The earth, the planets, the universe is disposable. It's illogical to worry about temporal things." S #5

Our ecosystem is indispensable to human life.
If you want out, stop eating. You'll be gone in a week or two.

 

[Bigdog]

Relevance?

You claim to only engage in sustainable commercial fishing, yet you know nothing about shark finning.

 

[cancel2 2022]

You claim to only engage in sustainable commercial fishing, yet you know nothing about shark finning.

I watched a TV programme a while back where Gordon Ramsay tried to investigate the shark finning industry in Puerto Rico. Understandably they don't like cameras and he had to get out PDQ when he was threatened by some large guys with guns. It is a huge industry there and is mostly run by the Taiwanese Mafia.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

 

[cancel2 2022]

NOAA has finally been rumbled, heads should roll for this.

They played fast and loose with the figures -NOAA whistleblower

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/02...pausebuster-paper-was-hyped-broke-procedures/

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

This is huge news but understandably the CAGW crowd will just hope it goes away!! It won't, the jig is up boys and girls!! Rana, Rune, Watermark, Grind et al, you've all been lied to but are far too hubristic to accept the facts.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

 

[Rune]

You claim to only engage in sustainable commercial fishing, yet you know nothing about shark finning.

1. I am well aware of shark finning. We discussed it for 14 pages at DCJ.

2. The fisheries I do participate in are sustainable.

 

[cancel2 2022]

This is huge news but understandably the CAGW crowd will just hope it goes away, well it won't, the jig is up boys and girls!!

Rana, Rune, Watermark, Grind et al, you've all been lied to but are far too hubristic to accept the facts.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

As predicted none of the warmist snowflakes will even address this, it is well above their paygrade!

 

[Bigdog]

1. I am well aware of shark finning. We discussed it for 14 pages at DCJ.

2. The fisheries I do participate in are sustainable.

So that was you. You believe that killing all the giant grazers of the ocean (whales) and killing all the wolves of the ocean (sharks) has no impact on the ocean ecosystem including the 50% decline in plankton. Plankton which sequester CO2 at 500 times the rate of terrestial plants.

And believe bottom trawling, long line fishing, taxpayer subsidized fishing fleets, and overcatch killing, are insignificant compared to a life-giving gas being restored to our atmosphere. And you have to ask why it's relevant?