After Trump Took the Lead, Election Deniers Went Suddenly Silent...

Then he took the lead and suddenly the magas set that all that aside.
You have an example? Of someone setting election integrity aside?

Being happy the right-tribe won despite the unknown quantity of cheating is not "setting election integrity aside".


How do we know that millions of illegals didn't vote for him, since he always accuses them of voting for Dems?
Well election fraud organizations have been linked to the Harris campaign. Over a thousand fraudulent registration attempts in PA.

That kinda supports the notion that the democrats are the ones cheating, and they don't cheat by convincing illegals to vote the way they want them to. They cheat by stealing identities and sending in fraudulent ballots.


How can we trust the results now, after years of being programmed that our election system is rotten to the core?
We can't. For all we know Trump won NY and the senate should be 60/40.

I know, why don't we stop all this pro-trump election fraud by securing the vote? That'll really show those MAGAs whose right!
 
I just looked this up.

Literally millions of votes are STILL BEING COUNTED.
DUH, dumbass.... That's literally what I said within my comment. What do you think the words "likely to end up with" and "when all is said and done" mean?? That counting has already been completed?? WOW you are a total moron........
They anticipate at the end that turnout will on par w/ 2020.
Your mind masters have been telling you that Democrat TURNOUT was much LOWER this time around, remember???

Having said that, it's possible, even probable, that TURNOUT is actually on par with (or even higher than) 2020, however, TOTAL BALLOTS COUNTED are going to still be UNDER 2020's number..... Now what does THAT tell you??? It tells me that there were millions of fraudulent ballots within the 2020 tallies...............
We can revisit this "proof of fraud" in about a week.
I have a thread all about it and am monitoring the results as they're being reported. Once California gets through their ballots (as they'll probably be last to do so), I'll be diving into their numbers too......
 
Ah, you do know that the vote has not been totally completed,
Poor anchovies........... What do you think the words "likely to end up with" and "when all is said and done" mean??? Dumbass.........
and funny how now it is 80 million,
Poor anchovies.......... can't keep numbers straight...... I'll help everyone else out (since you're incapable of being helped)....... 81 million is the number of ballots that were counted for Joe Biden.
elsewhere it was 20
18 million ballots is the number of claimed "fraudulent ballots". It comes from taking 81M and subtracting 63M from it (Harris's total ballots at the time). This was due to conservatives rushing to make a point without realizing that there were still MANY millions of uncounted ballots (because many states refuse to count them as fast as they SHOULD be able to count them, which is only done for fraud purposes, but I digress). Since I realized that not all the ballots have been counted yet, I put that number down to 10M (estimating that Harris gets 71M votes by the end of it). She's at 68M right now, and looks like she might even get over the 71M that I estimated (but not by much... maybe 72 or 73). That's still at least an 8M difference.

However, even with the incorrect 18M figure, the underlying point still stands. MILLIONS of fraudulent ballots were illegally inserted into the system in 2020 in order to cause the 2020 election to fault (hence installing Bribem instead of electing Trump).
And you wouldn’t believe anything unless Trump told you, if he said he shit gold, you’d believe him, which is why you swallowed the Big Lie, bait, hook, line, and sinker
Trump hasn't told me anything. I've never corresponded with the guy.

Poor anchovies.............
 
You have an example? Of someone setting election integrity aside?

Being happy the right-tribe won despite the unknown quantity of cheating is not "setting election integrity aside".



Well election fraud organizations have been linked to the Harris campaign. Over a thousand fraudulent registration attempts in PA.

That kinda supports the notion that the democrats are the ones cheating, and they don't cheat by convincing illegals to vote the way they want them to. They cheat by stealing identities and sending in fraudulent ballots.



We can't. For all we know Trump won NY and the senate should be 60/40.

I know, why don't we stop all this pro-trump election fraud by securing the vote? That'll really show those MAGAs whose right!
Go take a course in probabilities. All you're doing here is spouting the same old trump conspiracy theories we've been hearing since 2016.
 
What makes you think there wasen't cheating?
What makes you think there was?

Apparently the magas I've been talking about gave up that theory because I haven't read anything since the election saying that the Philly districts are being investigated for vooting improprieties.
 
Let's say for the sake of argument I have already.

What now?


....and the evidence keeps building, so those theories are aging like fine wine; at least the ones I'm spouting are.
If you did, then you'd understand that if an event happens a certain way once, that doesn't mean that it WILL happen the same way the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, nth times.
 
Last edited:
This is how weird magas are. Even on Election Day trump was screaming about massive cheating in Philadelphia, before the polls even closed. And this after years of frothing about election integrity. Then he took the lead and suddenly the magas set that all that aside. I don't know why. How do we know that millions of illegals didn't vote for him, since he always accuses them of voting for Dems? How can we trust the results now, after years of being programmed that our election system is rotten to the core?

This is just how weird magas are.

The only way he could lose was via Democrat voter fraud. But this time the Republicans were on top of it.
So, your contention is baloney.
 
If you did, then you'd understand that if an event happens a certain way once, that doesn't mean that it WILL happen the same way the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, nth times.
Is that what they teach in a probability course? Must be a new edition, that sounds more like metaphysics.

What event am I presuming (rather than inferring) has or will happened the same way?
 
Is that what they teach in a probability course? Must be a new edition, that sounds more like metaphysics.

What event am I presuming (rather than inferring) has or will happened the same way?
You believe that trump should have won in 2020 because he won in 2016. And when he lost, both trump and his sheep went on a rampage that the only reason he lost was because of cheating. He had zero evidence of cheating and the courts agreed there was none. So then trump and his sheep decided that the courts were stacked against him also.
 
You believe that trump should have won in 2020 because he won in 2016.
How did you infer that?


He had zero evidence of cheating and the courts agreed there was none.
I have piles of evidence and I got it all from my couch. I have to assume someone who is actually allowed to investigate would get a lot more.

So then trump and his sheep decided that the courts were stacked against him also.
Which was proven at the time for BS reasons for dismissing like "standing". This is how "standing" for election fraud would look like if the judge was doing his or her job:

Are you a citizen of the united states of America?
Yes
Then you have standing to sue for violation of the constitution.

The constitution is the social contract, breaches of the constitution are breaches of contract with every single citizen.
 
This is how weird magas are. Even on Election Day trump was screaming about massive cheating in Philadelphia, before the polls even closed. And this after years of frothing about election integrity. Then he took the lead and suddenly the magas set that all that aside. I don't know why. How do we know that millions of illegals didn't vote for him, since he always accuses them of voting for Dems? How can we trust the results now, after years of being programmed that our election system is rotten to the core?

This is just how weird magas are.




Dear ChristieFANNY



I didn't (and haven't) heard a single, teensy-weensy squeek from any of the 1000s of lawyers the Dummycrats hired to cry foul if so much as a single fraudulent ballot filled out in Trump's favour was bought to their attention.


Basically "Heels Up" Harris got her chicken-shit ass well and truly kicked, fair and square. And the Dummycrats KNEW IT, which is why Kamala conceded on the night without any fuss.


BTW: the Democrat have a long history of cheating in Presidential elections. There is now pretty much hard evidence to confirm that the 1960 US Presidential election between JFK and Richard Nixon was rigged. JFK won that election by a razor-thin margin. His father Joe Kennedy was a very wealthy man who made his money bootlegging during Prohibition. He was was well connected with the criminal underworld and approached Sam Giancana - a mob boss who controlled Chicago to help him get out the vote for JFK . Giancana used his influence with the the Teamsters Union along with various other ( often illegal) methods to get the vote out for JFK.


That's JUST ONE example ChristieFANNY.


JUst face it , ChrisieFANNY, you stupid Democrats got totally crushed by a a superior and totally RIGHTEOUS force in the form of Donald J. Trump. If you don't like it the it's "TOUGH TITTY BABY" - but you'll have to just SUCK IT UP, GIRL .... SUCK... IT...UP !!!


Ha - Ha - Harrrrr !!! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:



PS: ChristieFANNY don't forget to flick a few nude selfies (to my) JPP Private Mail In-Box. (But no "split -beavers" or any gross stuff like that, please:love::love::love::love:)



Dachshund Dawg

Dachshund the Loyal TRUMPER Hound !!
 
Back
Top