Well I'm not able to read minds like you think you can, if that is what ya mean.
That said: I've never claimed to be the sharpest knife in the ol' drawer...
A man needs ta know his limitations, (as ol' Clint Eastwood, [I like that feller] always says).
As to American Banks, I've seen you post that before, do you have proof or is that more mind readin' on yer part?
(His past bankruptcies would hurt his credit rating for bank loans, to be sure).
I do agree that the Dumpster does appear to have some character issues. That said: it doesn't increase Liberal/Progressive/Marxist/Statist/Fascist mind readin' skills jus' because a pol has some questions about his character now does it?
Both Putin and the Dumpster claim they have never met.
How could Putin teach the Dumpster KGB tricks if they never met?
You and I are 180 degrees apart.
I don't think I can read minds as you seem to think you can.
I do know that my suspicions of dim wit Democrat corruption, bigotry and nasty underhanded and illegal tactics were in fact proven with the recent email leaks.
Yer memory isn't as good as ya think.
I was never a 'birther', and people like Dumpster rode that horse into the ground.
Once Obamaprompter produced his birth cert the issue was settled, as far as I was corncerned; and I never posted about that particular issue as it was very unclear, and I could tell Obamaprompter and the dim wit Democrats were playin' those who opposed him.
There were still issues about his trip to Pakistan, butt: the 'birther issue' was a loser fer the right that Obamaprompter and the dim wit Democrats and the state run media worked to their advantage.
Ponderin' the proven recent tactics of dim wit Democrats that are now infected with TARD hardly makes a hillbilly with one functional brain cell a 'sage': Black Coal feller.
Agitating and protesting Dumpster's own ceremony doesn't appear to be something he would likely do at this point as I would think he has his hands full and he will be the next POTUS regardless of agitation, (then again: one functional brain cell does have limitations), eh?
Eastwood was OK, not good outside of his cowboy character.
What I've come to know about you is that you're no dummy, but feel compelled to play one on TV to support your political ideology. :0)
This Is Donald Trump’s Go-To Lender
It may be the perfect match of lender and borrower.
The bank that Donald J. Trump turns to more often than not when it comes to financing his real estate dreams is also the bank with some of the biggest reputational problems in the world.
Deutsche Bank AG (DB, +1.00%), Germany's largest bank, has led or participated in loans of at least $2.5 billion to companies affiliated with the Republican front-runner and extended loan commitments of at least another $1 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal. And that is despite the bank's most important decision refusing to do business with him since they fell out in 2008.
One of the most conspicuous features of Trump's campaign to date is the way that the securities and investment industry, traditionally a big backer of Republican candidates, has steered away from Trump. The WSJ cites calculations by the Center for Responsive Politics that
Trump has received less than $18,000 from Wall Street to date. By contrast, Hillary Clinton's campaign has received roughly $19 million, it said.
http://fortune.com/2016/03/21/donald-trump-bank-loans/
WSJ: When Donald Trump Needs a Loan, He Chooses Deutsche Bank
http://www.wsj.com/articles/when-donald-trump-needs-a-loan-he-chooses-deutsche-bank-1458379806
I know the bolded in the first post may seem like a plus for his hypnotized followers .. but what it really shows is that Wall Street and bankers know him for what he is .. a fraud.
I could post a shitload of other articles and thought about why banks shun Trump .. but my question is, do you guys ever do ANY real research on the people you support or defend? All they have to do is talk tough, huh?
How could Putin teach Trump KGB tricks if they never met? :0) Is that a serious question? Look at your calender brother .. this is 2016, not 1916. Do I really have to elaborate on that any further?
My apologies for thinking you were a birther. Of course you're smarter than that .. but it's the character you play on TV that I question.
Bigotry? For you, that's a buzzword you pull out of your hat when you run out of serious things to talk about. Don't get that twisted. I'm not suggesting that you are a bigot .. I'm suggesting that it couldn't be a real qualifier for you .. you vote for republicans.
"Ponderin' the proven recent tactics of dim wit Democrats that are now infected with TARD hardly makes a hillbilly with one functional brain cell a 'sage': Black Coal feller"
That shit was funny as hell. :0) Thanks
Trying to discredit the legions of Trump protesters through fake news sounds like something Trump would absolutely do. His ego is far more important to him then the responsibilities of being the president. This guy is tweeting at 3am about slights to his fragile ego. You don't have to be a mind reader to read character.