i've said many times on here that i'm not.
Crazy anarchist?
i've said many times on here that i'm not.
You also don't seem to care about facts either.
No, I don't give a rats ass about your "facts."
Or obviously anyone else's, that don't fit the world you've created in your mind.![]()
And guess what? I also don't give a rats ass about what you think is in my mind.
A young boy armed with a bag of skittles is dead and you choose to glorify his murderer. Your motivation for such sub-human behavior is unimportant.
Just know that I have no tolerance for it.
And guess what? I also don't give a rats ass about what you think is in my mind.
A young boy armed with a bag of skittles is dead and you choose to glorify his murderer. Your motivation for such sub-human behavior is unimportant.
Just know that I have no tolerance for it.
I guess your "tolerance" doesn't extend to the FACT that murder is a crime and he Zimmerman hasn't been convicted.
AND
If completely ignores the FACT that the majority of the left, or at lest the ones on this forum, automatically assigned race to Zimmerman; before it was revealed that he is Hispanic and even then they tried to change this to mean he was still white.
It's a little disturbing that someone who, for all intents and purposes, appears to be highly educated and intelligent, would be so close minded and biased.
Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.![]()
How about that?
More diversionary bullshit from the master obfuscater.
OF COURSE what JPP posters thought has NOTHING to do with Zimmerman's guilt or innocence, but hey, if USF can continue to confuse the discussion then he won't have to admit he's spent the past year glorifying the murderer of an innocent teen.
how do you know it was murder and not self defense?
how do you know it was murder and not self defense?
How do you know it was self defense and not murder?
I'm sorry, lying cowards don't get to ask me anything until you get around to backing up your bullshit.
Yeah dude, I am the one to talk.
My desire for civil conversation does not mean that I'm going to listen to nasty people like you .. who can never back up what they claim .. talk shit to me without me having some fun with it. :0) Talk shit to me if you choose .. expect that I'll be having fun with it.
When anyone chooses to engage in civil conversation, I respond in kind. I don't care which side of the political fence they're on, if they can debate civilly, that's the person I want to talk to.
Why don't we test that?
If you can possibly hold a civil conversation on any issue, I guarantee that I will respond in kind and respect, though I may disagree, with your opinion.
What do you think?
How do you know it was self defense and not murder?
I'm game, as long as you know that expressing my opinion on a topic is NOT "talking shit" to you. It is my opinion, and just as you, I have a right to it.
man you took the words right out of my head, what a colossal dissapointment. He did manage to get AFHC thru, thanks to a big lift from Roberts.He scares the shit out of me.
He's a warmonger.
I have no problem with anything civilly stated .. and I respect your right to say it.
I appreciate that...Now, where are we? Still talking about an Obama 2nd term? Or have we veered off topic into a Martin/Zimmerman thread?
man you took the words right out of my head, what a colossal dissapointment. He did manage to get AFHC thru, thanks to a big lift from Roberts.
He almost screwed that up too with his "non tax = tax".
About the only thing that scares me more is Romney - the dude is off his meds. But Obama has already done enough damage -forget this "lessor of 2 evils " crap.
Oh well I'm going green, the hell with these false choices of the duopoly -until a 3rd party gets established, the country is a corptocracy.