Adam Schiff accuses Devin Nunes of ‘secretly altering’ anti-FBI memo before sending i

I'll ask you again:


o, which is evidence of Russian collusion?

1. trump jr speaking to russian lawyer about dirt on trump?

2. Democrat party paying a company who used one foreign agent who used russian agents to get dirt on trump, then used said dossier to get FISA warrants on the opposition party?



Which side is there more evidence of "russian collusion"?

lol

Still having problems with literacy, I see.

Asked & answered.
 
Don't you ever post something on a topic or do you wait each day with baited breath to run your mouth at strangers on the internet? You seem rather angry.

Angry? Pfffft!

More difficulty in the comprehension end of things, I see.

Amused, pally boy.

Calling the willfully ignorant RW morons on their bullshit is a great pastime for me. I also learn a lot. For instance, I would have never known about that lying and discredited John Lott had you not quoted his bullshit on one of your first posts. So, unlike you, I actually looked into him and learned about his lies. Perhaps, if you had done that, you would not have looked so foolish. I doubt that, however. You have done a great job since then, on other topics, looking equally as foolish.
 
Angry? Pfffft!

More difficulty in the comprehension end of things, I see.

Amused, pally boy.

Calling the willfully ignorant RW morons on their bullshit is a great pastime for me. I also learn a lot. For instance, I would have never known about that lying and discredited John Lott had you not quoted his bullshit on one of your first posts. So, unlike you, I actually looked into him and learned about his lies. Perhaps, if you had done that, you would not have looked so foolish. I doubt that, however. You have done a great job since then, on other topics, looking equally as foolish.




yes, you quoted some butthurt liberal saying they didn't like lott, you didn't link to it, and you didn't show the data that he was wrong. you seem unwilling to think for yourself and rely on other idiot liberals to do your thinking for you.



You are an angry dependent class liberal who's mad at his betters.



I am a libertarian btw, I was for gay marriage, ending the drug wars, before you were.


Then again you are a homophobic bigot.
 
If Trump is not guilty, why is he trying so hard to kill or taint the investigation.? He slams Comey and Mueller endlessly. Comey helped make him president with the Hillary emails, which were not new after all. STrzok was the one who brought that info to Comey and urged him to air it. Both Comey and Mueller are lifetime repubs.

Problem is the evidence leads to Trump and his people.So Trump is attacking the FBI with the Republican house's help. Trump may cause serious rifts between the FBI and the House that may last long after Trump. He is attacking the separation of powers to save his own ass. He will destroy the FBI if he can.

An innocent man would welcome the investigation telling us how it will only clear him.
 
If Trump is not guilty, why is he trying so hard to kill or taint the investigation.? He slams Comey and Mueller endlessly. Comey helped make him president with the Hillary emails, which were not new after all. STrzok was the one who brought that info to Comey and urged him to air it. Both Comey and Mueller are lifetime repubs.

Problem is the evidence leads to Trump and his people.So Trump is attacking the FBI with the Republican house's help. Trump may cause serious rifts between the FBI and the House that may last long after Trump. He is attacking the separation of powers to save his own ass. He will destroy the FBI if he can.

An innocent man would welcome the investigation telling us how it will only clear him.




If you felt an investigation was stacked against you unfairly, would you hold this same position? would you purposefully let them railroad you?
 
yes, you quoted some butthurt liberal saying they didn't like lott, you didn't link to it, and you didn't show the data that he was wrong. you seem unwilling to think for yourself and rely on other idiot liberals to do your thinking for you.



You are an angry dependent class liberal who's mad at his betters.



I am a libertarian btw, I was for gay marriage, ending the drug wars, before you were.


Then again you are a homophobic bigot.

lol

Educate yourself for once. We have enough wilfully ignorant shitweasels on this forum. We don’t need another.

Lott:

Today the “more guns, less crime” hypothesis has been thoroughly repudiated. On closer inspection his impressive credentials reveal an academic nomad, never able to secure a place in academia. His ethical transgressions range from accusations of fabricating an entire survey, to presenting faulty regressions, to creating elaborate online personas to defend his work and bash critics, to trying to revise his online history to deflect arguments. And this doesn’t even begin to cover the whole host of false claims and statistics he has peddled repeatedly in articles and TV appearances.

His descent into dishonesty began ironically with a groundbreaking study.

https://www.armedwithreason.com/shooting-down-the-gun-lobbys-favorite-academic-a-lott-of-lies/

Our history goes back about a day, halfwit. Just as your posts demonstrate, you haven’t a clue about what I have been for or against and when.

It would behoove you to shut the fuck up before posting such nonsense.
 
lol

Educate yourself for once. We have enough wilfully ignorant shitweasels on this forum. We don’t need another.

Lott:

Today the “more guns, less crime” hypothesis has been thoroughly repudiated. On closer inspection his impressive credentials reveal an academic nomad, never able to secure a place in academia. His ethical transgressions range from accusations of fabricating an entire survey, to presenting faulty regressions, to creating elaborate online personas to defend his work and bash critics, to trying to revise his online history to deflect arguments. And this doesn’t even begin to cover the whole host of false claims and statistics he has peddled repeatedly in articles and TV appearances.

His descent into dishonesty began ironically with a groundbreaking study.

https://www.armedwithreason.com/shooting-down-the-gun-lobbys-favorite-academic-a-lott-of-lies/

Our history goes back about a day, halfwit. Just as your posts demonstrate, you haven’t a clue about what I have been for ir against and when.

It would behoove you to shut the fuck up before posting such nonsense.




so your source is an anti-gun propaganda site that bases it's findings on feelings of others? So under impressed, no wonder you hid it from me.



It would behoove you to shut the fuck up before posting such nonsense.


I love when people talk how they never would talk in person. you so brave kid, so brave.
 
^True Trumpophant.

For Trump, anything short of subservient bootlicking and loyalty pledges are unfair.

YOu are a mindless tool of the ruling class. You do know people can disagree with people, without being a "bootlicker" it's called "thinking for oneself". you should try is sometime as you look like a clown. my question actually had little to do with trump but with common sense, which you apparently struggle with.


I disagree with trump on the following.


1. Reinstated Clintons 1033 program giving police tanks.
2. Sessions recent anouncement on enforcing federal marijuana rules.
3. his support for single payer (yes thats actually what he supports)
4. failure to pull us out of foreign conflicts.
5. failure to truly overhaul the tax system
6. failure to repeal and replace obamacare
7. hes far too statist/populist
8. his tweets are usually dumb. Some are very entertaining but usually they are cringe worthy
9. I am against the wall, instead dry up benefits upon illegal entry
10. against his infrastructure plan
11. I am against his pro-affirmative action stance
12. I am against stop and frisk, he is for it.
13. I am against his pro-prison stance
14. I am against his strong pro eminent domain views.
15. I am against paid family leave
16. against his view on cuba
17. I am against much of his import tax views
18. I am against the f-35 jet program
19. His travel ban forgets saudi arabia and other countries that should be on it.
20. he's for the patriot act, I am not.
21. hes for a higher minimum wage, I am for what the market bears,
 
I'll ask you again:


o, which is evidence of Russian collusion?

1. trump jr speaking to russian lawyer about dirt on trump?

2. Democrat party paying a company who used one foreign agent who used russian agents to get dirt on trump, then used said dossier to get FISA warrants on the opposition party?



Which side is there more evidence of "russian collusion"?

The Mueller investigation is gathering the evidence. They have not released it to the public. We will become familiar with that is court. No some random idiot like you does not have it, That does not mean it does not exist. Trump thinks it does have it. That is why he is so desperate to end the investigation. He will destroy the FBI if he has to.

Evidence on Hillary and Russia....zero. So that one is easy. Who is stupid enough to thing the US allowing a Russian company to buy 51 percent of a Canadian mining company, is a crime. Is anybidy really that twisted?

The Dems picked up the Republican investigation after Trump won the primaries . It was a Republican financed investigation until then. Once Hillary picked it up, it became a crime. When the Repubs paid for it and organized it, it was innocent. You guys must occasionally leave the Fox bunker .
 
Last edited:
so your source is an anti-gun propaganda site that bases it's findings on feelings of others? So under impressed, no wonder you hid it from me.






I love when people talk how they never would talk in person. you so brave kid, so brave.

lol

Hide from you? Here I am, douchenozzle, continuing to point out your miserable failures. Have you always had this propensity to distort?

Just can't stand it when your source material is revealed as bullshit, can you? I see you have failed to offer anything to refute the characterizations of your liar.

Again, halfwit, you make a statement that really reveals your massive ignorance. What leads you to believe that I would not tell you the same thing to your face that I am saying here? NOTHING, pally.
 
The Mueller investigation is gathering the evidence. They have not released it to the public. We will become familiar with that is court. No some random idiot like you does not have it, That does not mean it does not exist. Trump thinks it does have it. That is why he is so desperate to end the investigation. He will destroy the FBI if he has to.

You so want that to be true. how long has the investigation been going on? 1 million a day. what evidence is there?

Evidence on Hillary and Russia....zero. So that one is easy. Who is stupid enough to thing the US allowing a Russian company to buy 561 percent of a Canadian mining company, is a crime. Is anybidy really that twisted?


Strawman you dumb fuck, stop making them.


The Dems picked up the Republican investigation after Trump won the primaries . It was a Republican financed investigation until then. Once Hillary picked it up, it became a crime. When the Repubs paid for it and organized it, it was innocent. You guys must occasionally leave the Fox bunker .

The dossier wasn't in existance until the dims paid for it. so now you dumb fuck, tell me how this guy using russians to dig dirt up on trump is not collusion and trump jr meeting with a russian lawyer is.


Please stop throwing up strawmen and red herrings and try to focus you hump.
 
lol

Hide from you? Here I am, douchenozzle, continuing to point out your miserable failures. Have you always had this propensity to distort?

Just can't stand it when your source material is revealed as bullshit, can you? I see you have failed to offer anything to refute the characterizations of your liar.

Again, halfwit, you make a statement that really reveals your massive ignorance. What leads you to believe that I would not tell you the same thing to your face that I am saying here? NOTHING, pally.




cuck boy, you hid the source of your idiotic attack the messenger because it was from a hack site. are you really this stupid that you cant even read?


Show me using real statistics and evidence that lott was wrong in that particular moment. You'll have to think for yourself, which we know is a burden for you.
 
YOu are a mindless tool of the ruling class. You do know people can disagree with people, without being a "bootlicker" it's called "thinking for oneself". you should try is sometime as you look like a clown. my question actually had little to do with trump but with common sense, which you apparently struggle with.


I disagree with trump on the following.


1. Reinstated Clintons 1033 program giving police tanks.
2. Sessions recent anouncement on enforcing federal marijuana rules.
3. his support for single payer (yes thats actually what he supports)
4. failure to pull us out of foreign conflicts.
5. failure to truly overhaul the tax system
6. failure to repeal and replace obamacare
7. hes far too statist/populist
8. his tweets are usually dumb. Some are very entertaining but usually they are cringe worthy
9. I am against the wall, instead dry up benefits upon illegal entry
10. against his infrastructure plan
11. I am against his pro-affirmative action stance
12. I am against stop and frisk, he is for it.
13. I am against his pro-prison stance
14. I am against his strong pro eminent domain views.
15. I am against paid family leave
16. against his view on cuba
17. I am against much of his import tax views
18. I am against the f-35 jet program
19. His travel ban forgets saudi arabia and other countries that should be on it.
20. he's for the patriot act, I am not.
21. hes for a higher minimum wage, I am for what the market bears,

Wonderful. I'll repeat my post for emphasis.

"For Trump, anything short of subservient bootlicking and loyalty pledges are unfair."

So unfair that his people, as well as Orangetweet himself, have close Russian ties and he's trying to subvert any investigations that uncover those relationships.

Obstruction of justice, pally boy, any way you shake it out.
 
Wonderful. I'll repeat my post for emphasis.

"For Trump, anything short of subservient bootlicking and loyalty pledges are unfair."

So unfair that his people, as well as Orangetweet himself, have close Russian ties and he's trying to subvert any investigations that uncover those relationships.

Obstruction of justice, pally boy, any way you shake it out.





cuckhold, the only known collusion was between your criminal candidate.
 
You so want that to be true. how long has the investigation been going on? 1 million a day. what evidence is there?




Strawman you dumb fuck, stop making them.




The dossier wasn't in existance until the dims paid for it. so now you dumb fuck, tell me how this guy using russians to dig dirt up on trump is not collusion and trump jr meeting with a russian lawyer is.


Please stop throwing up strawmen and red herrings and try to focus you hump.

Are you unable to understand English? Muellers evidence has not come out yet. that is how investigations work. you gather evidence to make a case. You do not wreck your case by giving it to the public and certainly not Fox viewers. Are you OK?

Look up strawman. it eludes you just like all logic does.

Collusion is being involved in money laundering with Russians and doing business with them on the sly. like Trump and his kids. Investigating Russians for crimes in the fucking opposite of collusion. Damn, people like you are scary.
 
cuck boy, you hid the source of your idiotic attack the messenger because it was from a hack site. are you really this stupid that you cant even read?


Show me using real statistics and evidence that lott was wrong in that particular moment. You'll have to think for yourself, which we know is a burden for you.

Silly little lazy fuck. Just because you were too fucking lazy too look into someone you were quoting is on your shoulders, not mine. Nice try at passing the blame, though.

I already tried to help you out with some solid advice on your moronic posts. Do your homework FIRST, then post. You'll look less foolish that way.

Not to worry though. I'm setting the bar very low for you and have minimal expectations that you will follow through.
 
Back
Top