About tech stocks...

Matt Dillon said:
You don't know how to retaliate? Why not, brah? I tell Ya why. Bcuz U R n00B.

You just admitted you wouldn't, so you are not on my level at all.

Do you know how many times ebay has been hacked and 100s of thousands of people's info has been leaked?
You wouldn't even fight back, you fucking pussy bitch! That's the difference between me and you. I am not a pussy bitchboi.
I know how to fight back and you're some n00b dumbshit that doesn't. :dunno:

And wouldn't if he could. :dunno:

Because you're a pussy. You pusillanimous piece of shit!

oR WoULD YeW IF YoU KnEw How?
Click to expand...

TILT-A-WHIRL

:rofl2::rofl2:
 
Jack said:
It was straight forward.
A Cyber Attack is a National Security threat.
You can stick your head in the sand and ignore it.
It's what China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, etc. want you to do.
Click to expand...

I guess I was just super tired when I read it the first time. I get it now.
 
Matt Dillon said:
I fail to see how they can be at their highest ever when none of those companies are even bringing any products to market.

How can the stock be soaring when they have no product to market at all?

There is NO inventory. Zero! No products whatsoever!

I think China might be trying to take over Taiwan may be the reason.

I just can't wrap my head around how companies with nothing to sell can have their stock keep rising.

I tell you this: It's unsustainable.
Click to expand...

because money is not the goal. power and tyranny is the goal. these companies are propped up by deep state compliant oligarchs.
 
Walt said:
We have spent 150 years building a supply chain, so it is there.
Click to expand...

I have no words for your level of stupidity.

We have not relied on other countries for several years now. No, there are no supply chains in place.

Were you the fucktard that said Russia and Iran? Or was that a different fucktard?
 
Last edited:
Matt Dillon said:
I have no words for your level of stupidity.

We have not relied on other countries for several years now. No, there are no supply chains in place.

Were you the fucktard that said Russia and Iran? Or was that a different fucktard?
Click to expand...

It always surprises me that random people on the internet think they can solve complex problems easily, and that no one has ever thought of other problems.
 
Jack said:
Translation: 'Sure, other Countries could take us our like Pearl Harbor or 9/11, but I'm a Keyboard Genius ... so No Gas, No Food, No Water, No Electricity, won't affect me'.


:thumbsupkid:
Click to expand...

Translation: "I don't know what an IP address or RAT is."
 
Matt Dillon said:
There's no supply lines in place. US is going to run out of gas.

IMO that "ransomware shut down the pipeline" was a cover story for it already happening.
Click to expand...

Interesting that you would claim to know all about sub7 but then would claim that ransomware can't shut down a pipeline. I guess that shows you were never anything more than a script kiddie.

ND and Texas are both producing less than they were a year ago. We still have a lot of capacity in the US and with oil prices hitting $70 they are at the point of being profitable to bring back on line.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You can't talk about tech stocks without knowing what FAANG is since it is the list of the tech stocks that matter most.

Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google(Now named Alphabet but ticker symbol is still GOOG)
Click to expand...

Oh, I'd never put my money on any of those for GP.

General Principles. GE either.

I think the difference between us is that you think inside a predetermined for you box, and I don't.
 
Last edited:
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Interesting that you would claim to know all about sub7 but then would claim that ransomware can't shut down a pipeline. I guess that shows you were never anything more than a script kiddie.

ND and Texas are both producing less than they were a year ago. We still have a lot of capacity in the US and with oil prices hitting $70 they are at the point of being profitable to bring back on line.
Click to expand...

If they never had a backup of the hard drives it could. I could stop ransomware from starting at boot if I had time to search for it. It uses Windows boot, not BIOS boot.

Yes, I did know about Sub7...in fact mobman gave me it 4 days before general release and I mm'd it to 4400 AOL staff members I had collected from hacking an internal.

I had mm'd it 2 days before general release. My icq was one steady ring to where I couldn't possibly check them all for 2 weeks.

The way I got rid of the present-day ransomware was nuking the drive and copying a functional Windows image.

It was faster than spending 1-2 hrs hunting down how the thing (No it's not "The Thing") starts and stopping it from starting and deleting the files.

I say it was all a cover story, because it's weak AF.

I say Biden shutting off drilling caused a fuel crisis, and they ran cover with that weak-ass story.

More to come..believe that. They won't be able to hide it next time.

Any geek worth his salt can stop ransomware from starting with Windows.

There's only so many places to put the startup .inis and files.


This is about 1/3 of the things you can do:

https://blog.emsisoft.com/en/31002/basics-manual-malware-identification-removal/

I'm a lil more advanced..take regular backups of your stuff.

If a fuel company that supplies the eastern seaboard doesn't take weekly backups of their software to do so, and leaves themselves open to cyber attacks...:dunno:

That's folly.

There's a lot of businesses and infrastructure like that in America. China hacked Miami traffic grid before.

They need to get more secure and take more backups.

The best Chinese hackers couldn't get around a dedicated old-ass linux hardware firewall. Nope.
 
Last edited:
Matt Dillon said:
Oh, I'd never put my money on any of those for GP.

General Principles. GE either.

I think the difference between us is that you think inside a predetermined for you box, and I don't.
Click to expand...

And yet anyone that had put their money on any of those even just 10 years ago would have seen a return of over 1000% compared to the 225% return from the DJIA.

It seems your box is to think small and not have great returns in the market. While it is certainly a valid investment position to take, it is not one that thinks outside the box.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
And yet anyone that had put their money on any of those even just 10 years ago would have seen a return of over 1000% compared to the 225% return from the DJIA.

It seems your box is to think small and not have great returns in the market. While it is certainly a valid investment position to take, it is not one that thinks outside the box.
Click to expand...

Oh? Who said those are the best "tech" stocks to invest in? They certainly are NOT right now.

10 years was a long time ago.

They may tell you those are the best tech stocks, but that's not going to make you money in 2021.

PS: "Goog" certainly isn't up 1000% 10 years later.

If I had the money, I would have bought AMD in 2011.

I kinda has a knack.
 
Last edited:
Matt Dillon said:
Oh? Who said those are the best "tech" stocks to invest in? They certainly are NOT right now.

10 years was a long time ago.

They may tell you those are the best tech stocks, but that's not going to make you money in 2021.
Click to expand...

Dick talks out his ass about anything financial. The King of google and that is about it.
 
Sailor said:
Dick talks out his ass about anything financial. The King of google and that is about it.
Click to expand...

On the other forum I was at, there was a financial genius girl that was pretty cool. Her grandfather taught her, and she knew her stuff.

She wasn't a leftist shitbag shill, either. :laugh:

I didn't learn enough from her. Doubt I could ever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top