Abortion thought experiment

I know it sounds cool, but next thing you know you've got swarms of those things swooping down out of the sky, snatching away babies left and right.

Ok I'm going to cinch the Gordian knot a bit. The boy is Master Donald J. Trump and swooping pterodactyl whatever embryos on the other hand. Same result?
 
I say same answer because if science could make embryos of these dinosaurs once before, they should be able to do it again.
 
the answer is obvious......you grab the closest abortion provider, gut him......place the embryos is his corpse, drench the child and yourself in his blood.....run through the flame wall shielding yourself and the child as much as possible with the skin of the abortionist......remember to replace the embryos in a refrigerated receptacle as soon as possible......
 
the answer is obvious......you grab the closest abortion provider, gut him......place the embryos is his corpse, drench the child and yourself in his blood.....run through the flame wall shielding yourself and the child as much as possible with the skin of the abortionist......remember to replace the embryos in a refrigerated receptacle as soon as possible......

I would still let a JPP liberals kid burn to a crisp
 
the answer is obvious......you grab the closest abortion provider, gut him......place the embryos is his corpse, drench the child and yourself in his blood.....run through the flame wall shielding yourself and the child as much as possible with the skin of the abortionist......remember to replace the embryos in a refrigerated receptacle as soon as possible......

Check, another dishonest answer from a rabid religious nutbag, just as the author of the hypo predicted.

You can save 1000 tiny live human embryos or a live 5 year old child from certain death. Pick.
 
I say same answer because if science could make embryos of these dinosaurs once before, they should be able to do it again.

You are like Prophet fighting the premises!

OK, we didn't make them with science, we found them inside a melted iceberg due to corozon's dereliction on climate science. We will never see their like again, and pick! One kid or a dinosaurs unextinct (and all the fame and glory that goes with it. The kid will be burned unrecognizable and my team is waiting outside to scurry you to a safehouse where you can raise a few dinosaurs for your coming out party
to much fanfare in 2 years. Think of it. Cute baby dinos on stage on your little leash on the tonight show.
 
Yes or no, A or B.

You couldn't answer either.

It's A or B, period. Thanks for showing that you aren't man enough to admit even a little mistake like that.

And it's not that I couldn't answer; instead I choose to reveal the lack of understanding of the issue by the OP author.
 
you have a person with a gun in hand threatening to kill all those around him. in the other corner, you have a stack of 36 AR-15s fully loaded. Do you shoot and kill the person holding the gun who is threatening or do you confiscate the 36 AR-15s from the other corner?

In all my years of dealing with idiots who claim guns are to blame for gun violence, i'd like a straight answer for once.
 
you have a person with a gun in hand threatening to kill all those around him. in the other corner, you have a stack of 36 AR-15s fully loaded. Do you shoot and kill the person holding the gun who is threatening or do you confiscate the 36 AR-15s from the other corner?

In all my years of dealing with idiots who claim guns are to blame for gun violence, i'd like a straight answer for once.

Que up Zippy's whining that you're aborting the abortion thread!
 
You are like Prophet fighting the premises!

OK, we didn't make them with science, we found them inside a melted iceberg due to corozon's dereliction on climate science. We will never see their like again, and pick! One kid or a dinosaurs unextinct (and all the fame and glory that goes with it. The kid will be burned unrecognizable and my team is waiting outside to scurry you to a safehouse where you can raise a few dinosaurs for your coming out party
to much fanfare in 2 years. Think of it. Cute baby dinos on stage on your little leash on the tonight show.

Ok, this time the kid dies, and I use my wealth to buy the grieving parents a Cinco boy.

 
It's A or B, period. Thanks for showing that you aren't man enough to admit even a little mistake like that.

And it's not that I couldn't answer; instead I choose to reveal the lack of understanding of the issue by the OP author.

Is anyone surprised AT ALL that JPP's hypocritical Rightie can't/won't make a simple either/or choice?

I predict Pro-choice folks will be able to aggravate the hell out of the anti-choice folks for MONTHS with this one.
 
Is anyone surprised AT ALL that JPP's hypocritical Rightie can't/won't make a simple either/or choice?

I predict Pro-choice folks will be able to aggravate the hell out of the anti-choice folks for MONTHS with this one.

You don't understand the difference between can't and choose not to. Yet you claim to be pro choice. lol
 
The alternative to providing women choice and freedom over their biology is slavery. It's never been more complicated than that.
 
"Here it is. You're in a fertility clinic. Why isn't important. The fire alarm goes off. You run for the exit. As you run down this hallway, you hear a child screaming from behind a door. You throw open the door and find a five-year-old child crying for help. .
They're [sic]in one corner of the room. In the other corner, you spot a frozen container labeled "1000 Viable Human Embryos." The smoke is rising. You start to choke. You know you can grab one or the other, but not both before you succumb to smoke inhalation and die, saving no one. 4/

Do you A) save the child, or B) save the thousand embryos? There is no "C." "C" means you all die.

In a decade of arguing with anti-abortion people about the definition of human life, I have never gotten a single straight A or B answer to this question. And I never will. " Patrick Tomlinson

http://www.scarymommy.com/patrick-s-tomlinson-twitter-abortion/?utm_source=FBOnsite

That foolish scenario is like asking the question of "do you still beat your wife?"

Patrick fails to acknowledge one important thing about what's in the building. Any dumbass that would pose that scenario thinking it proves anything regardless of the answer isn't very smart.
 
The alternative to providing women choice and freedom over their biology is slavery. It's never been more complicated than that.

Yet many woman that demands freedom and choice has no problem demanding those of us she told to butt out to pay for those choices when she can't.
 
Is anyone surprised AT ALL that JPP's hypocritical Rightie can't/won't make a simple either/or choice?

I predict Pro-choice folks will be able to aggravate the hell out of the anti-choice folks for MONTHS with this one.

I predict you'll believe that a foolish scenario proves anything other than you're an idiot for using it.
 
You don't understand the difference between can't and choose not to. Yet you claim to be pro choice. lol

That's why they also support massive social programs. They don't distinguish between truly can't work and simply won't work.
 
Back
Top