Sorry you incredibly arrogant human stain but you are far from qualified to address me.
Go fuck yourself.
A trial without witnesses is unconstitutional.
- Thread starter Rune
- Start date
Sorry you incredibly arrogant human stain but you are far from qualified to address me.
Go fuck yourself.
You truly are a concrete thinking pedantic douche nozzle. What the fuck is the point of your oxygen banditry?
Well, I don't know whether an impeachment without documents or witnesses is unconstitutional, but I do know an impeachment without them is not a trial.
Having a judge up there and pretending it was one was nothing but a sham and a disgrace. Add it to the pile of disgraces.
Not according to the definition of "trial". Not one word it the definition says witnesses.
The subject is impeached in the House and tried in the Senate. You tell me, you are the lawyer.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello midcan5,
Well, this 'moron' is pretty good at controlling the story. No matter what the story is, his version is always different, which then is taken up by the whole cult, and the actual story rejected.
How about this quote? Is this an uncanny description of Potus or what?
"The truth unquestionably is, that the only path to a subversion of the republican system of the Country is, by flattering the prejudices of the people, and exciting their jealousies and apprehensions, to throw affairs into confusion, and bring on civil commotion. Tired at length of anarchy, or want of government, they may take shelter in the arms of monarchy for repose and security."
[ Yeah, well, the problem, Alex, is that the person who is becoming king is the same man you describe below: ]
Those then, who resist a confirmation of public order, are the true Artificers of monarchy—not that this is the intention of the generality of them. Yet it would not be difficult to lay the finger upon some of their party who may justly be suspected. When a man unprincipled in private life desperate in his fortune, bold in his temper, possessed of considerable talents, having the advantage of military habits—despotic in his ordinary demeanour—known to have scoffed in private at the principles of liberty—when such a man is seen to mount the hobby horse of popularity—to join in the cry of danger to liberty—to take every opportunity of embarrassing the General Government & bringing it under suspicion—to flatter and fall in with all the non sense of the zealots of the day—It may justly be suspected that his object is to throw things into confusion that he may “ride the storm and direct the whirlwind.”"
- Alexander Hamilton.
That's the best description of what DT does with the media.
Well, this 'moron' is pretty good at controlling the story. No matter what the story is, his version is always different, which then is taken up by the whole cult, and the actual story rejected.
How about this quote? Is this an uncanny description of Potus or what?
"The truth unquestionably is, that the only path to a subversion of the republican system of the Country is, by flattering the prejudices of the people, and exciting their jealousies and apprehensions, to throw affairs into confusion, and bring on civil commotion. Tired at length of anarchy, or want of government, they may take shelter in the arms of monarchy for repose and security."
[ Yeah, well, the problem, Alex, is that the person who is becoming king is the same man you describe below: ]
Those then, who resist a confirmation of public order, are the true Artificers of monarchy—not that this is the intention of the generality of them. Yet it would not be difficult to lay the finger upon some of their party who may justly be suspected. When a man unprincipled in private life desperate in his fortune, bold in his temper, possessed of considerable talents, having the advantage of military habits—despotic in his ordinary demeanour—known to have scoffed in private at the principles of liberty—when such a man is seen to mount the hobby horse of popularity—to join in the cry of danger to liberty—to take every opportunity of embarrassing the General Government & bringing it under suspicion—to flatter and fall in with all the non sense of the zealots of the day—It may justly be suspected that his object is to throw things into confusion that he may “ride the storm and direct the whirlwind.”"
- Alexander Hamilton.
That's the best description of what DT does with the media.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Micawber,
He was a wind-up rubber stamp 'judge.' That spectacle hurt the reputation of the SCOTUS.
He was a wind-up rubber stamp 'judge.' That spectacle hurt the reputation of the SCOTUS.
STILL LYING, HUH?
THE STALIN-O-CRATS PRESENTED THE TESTIMONY OF SEVENTEEN WITNESSES AND COUNTLESS DOCUMENTS IN THE SENATE.
STOP THE FUCKING LIES.
Nope. we do that. Our taxes. You would think trump would respect them, but he does not.
Into the Night
Verified User
There were witnesses. The Democrats claimed 17 of them. Also, witnesses are not required for a trial.
Into the Night
Verified User
Inversion fallacy.
No one is becoming king.
The media did it to themselves. Trump did nothing.
Into the Night
Verified User
SCOTUS isn't about reputation, dumbass.
Into the Night
Verified User
Goalpost fallacy. We pay taxes for both the President and for the men that protect him. Trump pays the men that protect him.