A Third Grader Eyeing the Classroom Door

first, it should be a security guard or a teacher eyeing the door so the third graders don't have to.....second, this is what we worried about when I was a third grader....defensive procedures in the event of nuclear attack.....

90

Foreign enemies vs. Americans? :dunno:
 
the fact you concede your stupidity is appreciated.....

The fact that you compared this to the Red Scare shows how stupid you are. Why should the children be in fear for their lives from American cops and fellow Americans?

Do you expect your neighbor to break in your door to kill you? No?
 
Comparison to the Red Scare is a reminder that government action can fix the problem. Kids don't still hide under their desks. We need to do about guns what we did about the arms race.
 
Hello martin,

When those at this forum went to school, most of us anyway, no one worried about the door being locked to keep the class from getting gunned down. We force children today to endure that thought as a tradeoff for a wide open gun culture. Is it worth it?

NO!

But the rich and greedy selfish gun profiteers think so.
 
When those at this forum went to school, most of us anyway, no one worried about the door being locked to keep the class from getting gunned down. We force children today to endure that thought as a tradeoff for a wide open gun culture. Is it worth it?
Yes. Keeping the 2nd Amendment alive and real is ALWAYS worth it. So since it's always worth it, you have to channel your focus on the much more serious side of the problem, and that's the wielder, himself.

You have to ask yourself, "what in the fuck are we doing as a society that allows this kind of monster to get the way he becomes? Is it loose morals? is it ZERO morals? Maybe it's the pink hair on those fat cows that can't stop yelling at people. Whatever it is, we have to figure it out and attack it from that angle".
 
do you not know what 'akin to' means? you used the phrase.

It seems that my two replies to your posts disappeared into the void. So I will re-reply.

Yes I know what "akin to" means. You said that any gun regulation, control and law is an infringement on our rights. Thus, in the same vein, any traffic regulation, control and law is an infringement on our rights.

Not what I said exactly in the original reply but blech. Don't know what happened.
 
It seems that my two replies to your posts disappeared into the void. So I will re-reply.

Yes I know what "akin to" means. You said that any gun regulation, control and law is an infringement on our rights. Thus, in the same vein, any traffic regulation, control and law is an infringement on our rights.

Not what I said exactly in the original reply but blech. Don't know what happened.

no worries. what I replied to that post is that traffic regulations and laws are a state power granted to them via state constitutions. At least in the many i've read have it that way. In that regards, the feds do not have any constitutional authority over firearms
 
Back
Top