A rare window of absolute clarity into the minds of Trump voters


Quote Originally Posted by Hoosier Daddy (No, not really)
Observe as I humiliate and discredit myself even further by peddling debunked falsehoods and contradicting common knowledge facts


(so you get your dumbass gullible ass kicked with facts, so you make up stupid lying quotes of your betters to try and compensate.....INTERESTING.....)
 


That's odd, because here is Comey, in his own words, authorizing spying against President Trump...while simultaneously admitting that there was zero legal basis for doing so.

"Then-FBI Director James Comey had emailed then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and said that the FBI was "not able to sufficiently corroborate the reporting" in the now-infamous Steele dossier. The email was sent the same day Comey signed a FISA surveillance warrant that declared Steele’s reporting as verified."

Don't look now, but this is YOU being proven to be the only misinformed "dumb-ass" here, believing only what you "want to believe" and it turning out to be "all lies." :laugh:

Funny how you always end up being what you falsely smear others as being, isn't it? :thinking:



Aside from her STARTING the entire hoax and FUNDING it, sure. :palm:

200w.webp




You do realize that being in the same room with someone in no way implies that thoroughly debunked Hillary-funded conspiracy theories must suddenly magically stop being debunked, right?

By this logic, Obama, who marched down the street with the Black Panthers, MUST be a black supremacist (which is still clearly true though)...and every accusation Joseph McCarthy ever made must be true. Any encounters are proof of nefarious intent and crimes, right?

:awesome:

giphy.gif




Based on forged documents, lying to federal judges, and a Hillary-funded smear campaign that had already been disavowed by its own source? No. That's not following foreign intelligence to wherever it leads...it's manufacturing a lie, being an election-rigging traitor, and committing a major federal crime, lying imbecile.

:palm:

And again, notice how YOU'RE the one defending actual treason and actual traitors...while smearing those who point it out as being traitors for noticing. :awesome:



Let's deal with your first set of lies before moving on to the completely off-topic ones you're trying to change the subject with here. :nono:

It's as if you posted this entire set of long-debunked claims as an attempt to demonstrate the truth of the meme in my signature. :rofl2:

the steele dossier was raw data. steele said a lot of it was unconfirmed. he was the former head spy for the brits in Moscow, had a lot of contacts, and our agencies took him seriously. they checked out what he claimed, not because of Hillary, but because it is their job to check out sources from reliable agents like Steele. and they were not spying on trump. but with russians who hung out with trump and his russian loving cronies.
 
[QUOTE)=Arminius;4538656]Have you heard about the George Floyd statues going up while everything from George Washington to Abraham Lincoln statues get torn down? Yeah, it's reached THAT level of subversion and in-your-face war on Mainstream America. A career-felon and junky who pointed a gun at a pregnant woman's stomach prior to him resisting arrest, trying to flee, and getting himself aggressively pinned down by the police (he deserved to die) gets glorified while people who actually contributed major societal changes get vilified and discarded over completely made-up imaginary faults. The entire ruling class is now weaponized against the American people.[/[/QUOTE]

Yes, George Floyd is glorified (worshipped) today, as are ALL African Americans. It's called "worship of the beast" in the Bible (Revelation). That worship is in full swing today!
 
Last edited:
(so you get your dumbass gullible ass kicked with facts, so you make up stupid lying quotes of your betters to try and compensate.....INTERESTING.....)

Step 1: Change the subject and cling to your diversion for dear life.

Step 2: Respond to anyone not falling for your diversion by pretending your embarrassing Neanderthal butchery of the math was you "kicking someone's ass" to bait and taunt them into helping you avoid the subject of the OP.

I mean, okay, fine. Let's go ahead and see how you're making an ass out of yourself THIS time...

Biden:

-LOST Latino votes (Nationwide, Democrat Joe Biden got 66 percent support in national exit polls...Obama got 71% in 2012....BUT...MORE LATINOS VOTED, MORE EVERYBODY VOTED, The 2020 presidential election was historic in many ways. Amid a global pandemic, with unprecedented changes in how Americans voted, voter turnout rose 7 percentage points over 2016, resulting in a total of 66% of U.S. adult citizens casting a ballot in the 2020 election. If Obama got a slightly higher percentage of voters, it still does not translate into he got more latino votes, due to increased turnout.

The overall amount of voters increasing (or more accurately, Democrats printing off an increased amount of fake ballots) in no way invalidates the established fact that Obama got more minority votes than Biden, across the board (which kind of makes sense anyway if you think about it). That doesn't even make sense on its face, hence "Paola Ramos, the former Deputy Director of Hispanic Press for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign," making the sad attempt to attribute Biden's stunning loss of Latino votes to a "cultural identity crisis."

You don't just get to pretend away hard data that even your own party acknowledge and just hope that citing the overall increase in voter turnout (in Democrat cheating) confuses people into accepting the implosion as explained away.

You really aren't smart enough to convincingly lie with statistics. :palm:

Overall, one-in-four 2020 voters (25%) had not voted in 2016. About a quarter of these (6% of all 2020 voters) showed up two years later – in 2018 – to cast ballots in the highest-turnout midterm election in decades. Those who voted in 2018 but not in 2016 backed Biden over Trump in the 2020 election by about two-to-one (62% to 36%).


Right, because Mueller had already known by this point that the Russia hoax was a staged fraud but deliberately kept from announcing it until after the election, to maximize anti-Trump voter turnout...but increased voter turnout for Democrats in 2018 (manufactured by corrupt abuses of power or not), which is absolutely standard for the party out of power in mid-terms (Democrats still humiliated themselves with their wildly false 'blue wave' predictions), in no way indicates that increased overall turnout in 2020 (at the END of the left's four-year arson, anarchy, and murder spree) was about voters asking for MORE communist lunacy, racial terrorism, and open violations of everyone's rights.

As usual, that doesn't even make sense. Not one part of it, on any level. :laugh:

-LOST black votes (same as above) less percentage, higher actual votes

Same as above, the majority of Trump votes were from minorities...and no one is measuring the percentage of these minority votes as proportional to the overall vote. They are reporting what percentage of Latinos voted for Biden versus Trump, and noticing that Trump won a ton of them over and Biden lost a ton, same with blacks, etc.

That sound you just heard was your bullshit attempt to spin Biden's collapse in minority support (brought on by years of Democrat mistreatment of minorities, constant policy attacks on minority rights and interests, and Biden himself fumbling into constant horribly bigoted gaffes that alienate them) completely falling apart and failing to survive even a moment of serious scrutiny.

:laugh:

-LOST all the counties Obama gained (CLAIM: “They want us to believe that Joe Biden won 200 fewer counties than Obama but somehow got 9 million more votes? I don’t think so…”

AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. It’s true that President-elect Joe Biden received more votes than former President Barack Obama did in 2008, while winning fewer counties. Posts questioning Biden’s win based on these metrics lack the key context that the number of counties won does not correlate with the number of votes received nationwide.

THE FACTS: Data from The Associated Press shows that Biden won the presidential election with more than 81 million votes in 2020, but won just 527 of the United States’ 3113 counties.

Comparatively, in 2008, Obama won about 69 million votes, and 875 counties.

Social media users this week claimed it couldn’t possibly be true that Biden received more votes but won fewer counties than Obama, suggesting it must be a clue toward fraud or false reporting in this year’s election.

“They want us to believe that Joe Biden won 200 fewer counties than Obama but somehow got 9 million more votes? I don’t think so…” read a screenshot of a Twitter post shared more than 2,400 times on Facebook.

While that post’s numbers are slightly off, it’s true that Biden legitimately won more votes and fewer counties than Obama. That fact is not indicative of any significant fraud or irregularity, which election researchers have said was not detected in the 2020 election.

Jan Leighley, a political scientist at American University, told the AP the “supposed puzzle identified in these posts is an inappropriate/illogical comparison.”

“The claim implies that these two electoral outcomes (counties won and number of votes cast) should be highly correlated, or are even causal,” Leighley said in an email. “They are not—one is a measure of a geographical region vote, the other the number of votes cast.”

Counties across the United States vary dramatically in size, from populations of a few hundred people to several million. Trump won many smaller counties this year, while Biden pulled majorities in some of the nation’s largest counties, such as Los Angeles County in California and Maricopa County in Arizona.

This debunked claim was already destroyed the first time you tried it. Biden getting more "votes" than Obama while losing all the counties Obama gained could only be stretched into something believable if you DIDN'T also have him losing in Congress, losing minority support across the board, etc. It is all those things together that reveal what a bold-faced lie this whole thing mathematically HAS to be. There is literally no other way to reconcile it.

Lesson: If you're going to cheat, at least lift a finger to make it believable and keep it small. :palm:

-LOST in Congress (not entirely. look at Georgia.

You're using Election Theft Central (Georgia) as evidence that Biden had elevated support among voters. :lolup: :laugh: :rofl2:

Georgia Election Officials Receive Referrals for Nearly 100 Cases of Voter Fraud

Georgia absentee ballots never arrived in mail, hundreds of voters say: report

Georgia's Fulton County under state investigation for allegedly violating ballot drop box form rules

Georgia Data Show Over 30,000 of Trump’s Votes Removed, Another 12,173 Switched to Biden: Data Scientists

No state that you could've cited would be LESS possible to take seriously as the basis for such a claim.

200.webp


-GAINED NO female votes (Early exit polls show President-elect Biden winning the votes of 57 percent of women, compared to 45 percent of men...Women gave Obama 55% to Romney's 43%, a proportion that was unchanged from the president's lead among women in 2008..

Within the margin of error, hence "gained no female votes" is correct. Might be time for a first-year statistics course. :awesome:

What else you got? :cool:

200.webp

 
Last edited:
the steele dossier was raw data.

giphy.webp


I mean, I guess that's ONE way to characterized Hillary-funded misinformation that required doctoring evidence and lying to a federal judge to pass off as a legitimate basis for spying on your opponent during a major national election.

:rofl2:

steele said a lot of it was unconfirmed.

Um...his admissions about the Hillary-funded smear campaign being based on literally nothing went way beyond such an innocent characterization of it as him being an objective, impartial fact-finder who just hadn't verified the claims. It was manufactured out of thin air, based on literally nothing, by and for the Hillary campaign.

That is beyond dispute at this point. Look it up (on pretty much anything other than CNN or Rachel Maddow). :nono:

Steele's stunning pre-FISA confession: Informant needed to air Trump dirt before election

he was the former head spy for the brits in Moscow, had a lot of contacts, and our agencies took him seriously.

Which their own internal memos reveal they knew better than to do from the beginning, and did knowing full well that the claims were manufactured, Hillary-funded bullshit. Hence the word "treason" being applied to this attempt to overthrow a duly-elected president by the FBI and DOJ.

they checked out what he claimed, not because of Hillary

*not because of Hillary. ONLY because of Hillary. :nono:

State Department's red flag on Steele went to a senior FBI man well before FISA warrant

Any other blatantly misinformed lies you would like to try telling or are you good for now. :awesome:

and they were not spying on trump. but with russians who hung out with trump and his russian loving cronies.

Um, yes, blatantly lying to a federal judge and doctoring evidence to conduct completely illegal partisan surveillance on your opponent during a major national election...is spying. Obviously, no matter how many times Rachel Maddow insists on calling it something else.

:bs:
 
(so you get your dumbass gullible ass kicked with facts, so you make up stupid lying quotes of your betters to try and compensate.....INTERESTING.....)

Was his typical "debate" approach. He has no sensible argument so he waves his specialized take on the insult flag. Happens time after time.
 
I don't care to understand traitors to my country. I care that they be jailed or die. Unread

1) Say the people who:

-help illegal immigrants invade and rape our country

-steal elections

-burn down cities

-issue death threats for donating to anyone but Democrats

-dox, assault, and terrorize anyone who expresses dissent

-declare secession

-burn our flag

-ban our Pledge

-disrespect our Anthem

-tear down our monuments

-lie to school children about our history

-violate their oaths

-shred every part of the Constitution

-oppose national defense

-aid all our enemies

-betray all our allies

actual terrorist.JPG

2) Notice how it is leftists who always end up being the close-minded reactionaries? :thinking:

3) Pouting like a whiny, defeated bitch and projecting your addiction to treason onto others in no way establishes that anyone other than Democrats are actually betraying the country (at every turn).

giphy.webp
 
Last edited:
Was his typical "debate" approach. He has no sensible argument so he waves his specialized take on the insult flag. Happens time after time.

The people who posted literally nothing but empty spin and insults...accuse the person who just obliterated all their bullshit step by step with links, facts, and irrefutable proof that they are lying and wrong...of avoiding the debate by resorting to insults.

New stunningly self-unaware hypocrisy level achieved. :hand:

Projection.jpg

Go ahead. Show us where I have ever avoided the debate with smears (your signature move). :bs:

You don't just get to make up whatever you feel like and pretend away what happened. :laugh:

giphy.webp


Try again, dishonest demagogue. :cool:
 
I have never seen a more clear and succinct capturing of why Trump supporters see things the way they do. This is spot-on and perfectly fixes the disconnect. This should be shown far and wide so the lunatic fringe can have SOME kind of chance at understanding the American people.

Side note: No wonder the NSA wants Tucker Carlson destroyed. :laugh:

[video]https://rumble.com/vjo88x-tucker-shows-why-so-many-people-think-the-election-was-stolen.html[/video]


View attachment 20363

What crap. Do you never tire of right wing lies? It was a fair election and every audit proved it. The system works very well, right-wing brains do not. 60 court cases and more recounts given than any candidate ever got. Trump's claims were completely accommodated by Repub secretaries of states. He lost.
Trucker ,like you, does not deal with facts.
 
Rumble

Overall, we rate Rumble Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of right-wing propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as false information, use of poor sources, and a lack of transparency.

ttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rumble/

To be fair, it isn't Rumble that is doing that. It's the users themselves.
 
Back
Top