A question for Trump supporters. Exactly what is it that you've won?

blackascoal said:
Exactly what is it that Trump supporters believe they have won beyond the election?

The election was a battle, the war is not over.

It is projected that more than a million Americans will march to protest against the most hated man in American history to ever take office as president on this inauguration day. Trump is now the face of the Republican Party .. and the most rejected president in our history even before he spends one day in office.

Is this the 'winning' that republicans are talking about? Exactly what is it that you've won? Let me guess, you don't see how this story ends?

Even before Trump spends a day in the Oval Office, he's plagued by investigations, scandals, controversies, and massive rejection on a level never seen before in our history. Unprecedented.

Associations with Trump are already so toxic that he couldn't even get A-List country western artists to perform for his coronation. Forget about Beyonce, how about Garth Brooks and the rest of the CW crowd? The one A-Lister he did get doesn't support him.

His connections to Russia has the whole world nervous. Nobody trust him .. not even American banks. A rich guy who the banks don't trust.

NOW, he has to produce. .. in that climate.

How long do you think it will take before republicans turn on him? They never liked anyway, just thrust upon them by the large number of people in their party who thought voting for a celebrity that nobody trusts or like was a good idea.

My question to Trump supporters, what have you won beyond the battle? Everything Trump does will be undone.

The war for the future direction of this nation is just beginning.

What did you win?
Click to expand...

That your bitch lost. Winning can be looked by knowing you avoided what you didn't get as much as it can be by what you did get. In this case, it was a double winner.

Wasn't it Mark Lamont Hill that referred to blacks willing to work with Trump and that voted for him as "mediocre negroes". Lets look at the term mediocre. It is defined as being of moderate quality. That being said, while what Hill said isn't true about that particular group of blacks, mediocre is still well above the classification of black Democrat plantation house negroes and so far ahead of black Democrat plantation field negroes that it's a waste of time to measure the difference.
 
2 or 3 Supreme Court Justices that Hillary would have moved Heaven and Earth to block from her Senate seat...
 
blackascoal said:
.. and you believe that having an untested, unpopular and untrusted celebrity as president is better than having Hillary?

The so-called white working class could have chosen someone other than a celebrity, but they didn't.
Click to expand...

The Democrats could have chosen someone other than a social experiment in 2008 and 2012 but they didn't.

The left constantly uses celebrities to push their causes. In fact, you've made a big deal about how so many aren't performing at the inauguration. What that means is you don't have a problem with celebrities, as you make it out to be, as long as they believe like you.
 
blackascoal said:
Really?

It could be argued that helps the democrats more than it does republicans .. but why did they need PT Barnum to do it?

The expression, "out of the frying pan, into the fire" is appropriate here.
Click to expand...

It could be argued that you're a dumbass. No, wait. That argument is over and those of us that know you are won.

You idiots on the left are still arguing about the overall popular vote. For the last time, it doesn't count.
 
blackascoal said:
You mean you can't see what's coming?

You can see the now, and what's happening now does not bode well for Trump nor his supporters.

Not expecting you to make any pronouncements brother. I'm just pointing out the obvious.
Click to expand...

You mean speculation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top