A majority of white voters elected THE worst president in history. Intelligent???

coolbreeze said:
except for the fact that the worst President YET, in history was Obama by any measure.
trump has been president for 2 months, most free thinking people would give him a little more time don't you think?

But if crying racism makes you feel better in your insecurities, then that's your business, just seems sad to me
Click to expand...

Give him a little more time to do what?

He will never speak for me no matter how much time he has because our politics are diametrically opposite.

trump's an ignorant, lying corrupt crony capitalist whose only agenda is to enrich himself and his billionaire Cabinet buddies.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the majority of americans that vote decided that trump was the lesser of two evils. this speaks volumes upon volumes of the common sense of democrats who nominated an even worse candidate than the republicans came up with.
Click to expand...

More Americans voted for Hillary than for trump. Don't use the EC as an example of trump's "popularity."
 
christiefan915 said:
More Americans voted for Hillary than for trump. Don't use the EC as an example of trump's "popularity."
Click to expand...

it's ludicrous to use 3 million voters in california as a representative majority across the country. it doesn't work like that. it's like saying the residents of chicago represent the entire state of Illinois. and i'm not using the EC as a show of trumps popularity. he's only popular among the least educated of the country. he's only slightly more popular than clinton among the voting populace that is afraid to vote 3rd party.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I told you the reality of the situation. more independents felt trump was the lesser of two evils, therefore hillary lost.
Click to expand...

What they felt is not an excuse. What they did was elect an embarrassment, worst president ever .. AND, those who did were almost all white.. Where was the intelligence in that? Not what they felt .. where was the intelligence in evaluating a candidate to be president? I hear what you're saying .. but they weren't just running from Hillary. Lots of people of all races doesn't like Hillary .. but they didn't vote for Trump .. only white people did. What were they hearing from Trump that nobody else did?

you're confusing the elections in the US with that of Iraq during husseins reign. we had 5 candidates with at least a 5% chance of the vote, which means that those who would NORMALLY vote Democrat, but could not stomach hillary, could vote for trump, bernie, johnson, or even the really dumb woman on the green party ticket. The problem with the 10 to 15% of those who identify as democrats but could not in good conscience vote for hillary, most likely voted for trump because of their retarded ideology of '3rd parties cannot win'. This you can place squarely in the laps of the DNC, since both major parties push this theory 110% of the time.
Click to expand...

Does any of your theory have anything to do with republicans? Doesn't seem like it. You seem to believe that Hillary and the DNC are the problem, not the ignorance of the voters. "Both parties push it 110% of the time" .. but place this squarely in the laps of the DNC? That's silly.

yes, just not by as wide a margin.
Click to expand...

If you believe that brother .. kinda' explains why you blame other people for your vote. :0) get real

My work day is over .. gotta' run .. I'll continue after I shut it down and have dinner.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
it's ludicrous to use 3 million voters in california as a representative majority across the country. it doesn't work like that. it's like saying the residents of chicago represent the entire state of Illinois. and i'm not using the EC as a show of trumps popularity. he's only popular among the least educated of the country. he's only slightly more popular than clinton among the voting populace that is afraid to vote 3rd party.
Click to expand...

As far as I'm concerned that's a bogus argument. People live where they live and the votes in CA matter just as much as the votes in KS. Repubs won that state for decades before Bill Clinton and the Dems who followed him, and nobody bitched about it then.
 
christiefan915 said:
As far as I'm concerned that's a bogus argument. People live where they live and the votes in CA matter just as much as the votes in KS. Repubs won that state for decades before Bill Clinton and the Dems who followed him, and nobody bitched about it then.
Click to expand...

It didn't suck back then.
 
christiefan915 said:
As far as I'm concerned that's a bogus argument. People live where they live and the votes in CA matter just as much as the votes in KS. Repubs won that state for decades before Bill Clinton and the Dems who followed him, and nobody bitched about it then.
Click to expand...
The Electoral College has been used for over two centuries, you know that as well as me.

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note
 
Milagro said:
The Electoral College has been used for over two centuries, you know that as well as me.

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note
Click to expand...

Exactly. Which is why STY's comment is an exaggeration: "the majority of americans that vote decided that trump was the lesser of two evils."
 
you do not have the consent if the governed


what is more important in a democracy?


occupying the seat or having the peoples consent ?



here is a hint

In the USA only one of those answers is correct
 
blackascoal said:
What they felt is not an excuse. What they did was elect an embarrassment, worst president ever .. AND, those who did were almost all white.. Where was the intelligence in that? Not what they felt .. where was the intelligence in evaluating a candidate to be president? I hear what you're saying .. but they weren't just running from Hillary. Lots of people of all races doesn't like Hillary .. but they didn't vote for Trump .. only white people did. What were they hearing from Trump that nobody else did?
Click to expand...
verify that ONLY white people voted for trump, because the last demographic of voters I saw had people of ALL races voting for trump. I'm also a bit surprised that you want to discount 'feelings' now, since you're a liberal. but no matter, because they voted how they felt. perhaps their intelligence told them that hillary would be worse.

blackascoal said:
Does any of your theory have anything to do with republicans? Doesn't seem like it. You seem to believe that Hillary and the DNC are the problem, not the ignorance of the voters. "Both parties push it 110% of the time" .. but place this squarely in the laps of the DNC? That's silly.
Click to expand...
I've consistently said that it's been the responsibility of both sides, not just one. YOU are the one that wants to discount the democrat voters that did not vote for hillary.

blackascoal said:
If you believe that brother .. kinda' explains why you blame other people for your vote. :0) get real
Click to expand...
how am I blaming others for my vote? I voted my principles and conscience.

blackascoal said:
My work day is over .. gotta' run .. I'll continue after I shut it down and have dinner.
Click to expand...
be safe and enjoy
 
christiefan915 said:
As far as I'm concerned that's a bogus argument.
Click to expand...
which of course you use to justify your dissatisfaction. irrelevant, in the big picture of things, though.

christiefan915 said:
People live where they live and the votes in CA matter just as much as the votes in KS. Repubs won that state for decades before Bill Clinton and the Dems who followed him, and nobody bitched about it then.
Click to expand...
those 3 million votes in california counted, did they not? all 55 EC votes did go to hillary, right?
 
evince said:
you do not have the consent if the governed

what is more important in a democracy?

occupying the seat or having the peoples consent ?

here is a hint

In the USA only one of those answers is correct
Click to expand...

and your answer is incorrect. the peoples votes were counted according to the electoral college. a system we've used for over two centuries. the clinton camp knew this. they failed to campaign properly.
 
thank you for admitting you right wing fucks don't care about what the people want


you have made it clear that what Putin wants is all you care about
 
Milagro said:
I happen to think that is true, Trump could never have won if the Dems had fielded a decent candidate.

Sent from Lenovo K6 Note
Click to expand...

so you are just going to pretend that there were not massive lie filled fake stories created by Russia all over the internets?
 
evince said:
thank you for admitting you right wing fucks don't care about what the people want

you have made it clear that what Putin wants is all you care about
Click to expand...

the people are represented in elections by the electoral college. the people KNOW this. you should actually ask why didn't HILLARY care about what the people want, for she lacked campaigning in alot of states that she might have won had she not disregarded them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top