God you are dumb. Climate change models have shown that storms would descrease in number but increase in intensity. I'm amazed at you. Seriously, just start saying "did you see that colored guy over there". That's where you are. TO any educated person. What a hoople.
God you are dumb. Climate change models have shown that storms would descrease in number but increase in intensity. I'm amazed at you. Seriously, just start saying "did you see that colored guy over there". That's where you are. TO any educated person. What a hoople.
http://voices.yahoo.com/what-average-number-hurricanes-strike-8429677.html
LMAO... except that is simply more bullshit that shows their 'models' are WRONG.
You don't actually read up on any of this do you? You just parrot the talking points as if they were fact. They are not. They have been shown to be wrong. Morons simply refuse to educate themselves on the topic.
The above Grind is the data proving Darla's 'I looked out my window' theory is wrong.
Actually you posted from Wikipedia and Yahoo voices.
You were saying?
Hey SF, didn't you link to data (Yahoo voices -- LOL) about storms that make landfall in the US? Is that really the relevant metric?
your claim that climate change (man made) was somehow going to produce stronger storms, yet not as many.
The data was the number of storms on record that proves you wrong. It was listed several times, you ignored it each time and instead threw a tantrum.
Oh... Darla's rage is full blown now. you are the one throwing fits of rage all over the board.
It is really sad that you don't have one honest bone in your body... if so you would acknowledge the FACT that your claims on hurricanes was debunked by the data.
But you can't do that can you Darla... instead you toss a tantrum.
“Eight of the warmest years on record have occurred in the past decade”
——————————–
And many of the highest points on a sine-wave, will be near the crest of the wave. That does not imply that the sine-wave is not in decline from thereon in.
Did these guys ever get beyond kindergarten?
So a prediction about the present and future was "debunked" by past data??? LOL
Now, let me think about this, who was the first person on this thread to claim that fewer hurricanes were ocurring?
Oh yeah, it was you. If 'man made climate change' (I can't help notice that you keep leaving off the man made portion) was causing hurricanes, then why did the number decrease as 'man caused global warming' ????
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec.shtml
To which I responded: "Climate change models have shown that storms would descrease in number but increase in intensity. "
To which you are now responding that the number of hurricanes have increased.
Let's be clear: Right on this thread you claimed that the number of hurricanes have decreased and gave a link (Which I didn't go to so for all I know it's a link to a meatloaf recipe). THen I told you that I have read climate models showing that the number of hurricanes would decrease as part of climate change. Then you said "LMAO' they have INCREASED and gave a link for that.
All on the same thread.
100% proof that you will say ANYTHING, and then find a link from somewhere to "prove" it.
Q.E.D.
So a prediction about the present and future was "debunked" by past data??? LOL
Now, let me think about this, who was the first person on this thread to claim that fewer hurricanes were ocurring?
Oh yeah, it was you. If 'man made climate change' (I can't help notice that you keep leaving off the man made portion) was causing hurricanes, then why did the number decrease as 'man caused global warming' ????
To which I responded: "Climate change models have shown that storms would descrease in number but increase in intensity. "
To which you are now responding that the number of hurricanes have increased.
Let's be clear: Right on this thread you claimed that the number of hurricanes have decreased and gave a link (Which I didn't go to so for all I know it's a link to a meatloaf recipe). THen I told you that I have read climate models showing that the number of hurricanes would decrease as part of climate change. Then you said "LMAO' they have INCREASED and gave a link for that.
Funny how you can only see that one...
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec.shtml
Was also posted... but I guess you are going to ignore that one... right Dung?
I suppose you also ignored the source material from the Yahoo link... right Dung?
Sources:
Eric S. Blake, et al., "The Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Tropical Cyclones from 1851 to 2006," National Hurricane Center
"NHC Archive of Hurricane Seasons," National Hurricane Center
Anthony Watts has a reply to the Met Office, I would also recommend the comments as well, especially this one.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/10/...ponds-to-global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago/
Anthony Watts has a reply to the Met Office, I would also recommend the comments as well, especially this one.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/10/...ponds-to-global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago/
Um Dearest little Darla... if man made global warming was going to create more 'severe weather' (which is a claim that has been around for over a decade plus)
Why hasn't it done so?
Why did we have stronger storms in the 40's than during all this man made global warming?
What exactly is the claim based upon Darla if not models using past data? Seriously, do you know anything about this topic?
I stated a FACT with regards to the US. To debunk your stupidity. I know your 'i looked out my window' theory is still top notch to you and the sad part is, that is the most intelligent thing you have said on this topic.
You truly are ignorant aren't you? You realize everyone can see my posts right?
I stated the number was declining... it is...
You stated 'well, duh, they are supposed to decline and just be stronger'
Then I stated the number of strong ones are still DECLINING.... as the link I provided and YOU JUST USED proves.
Seriously, are you retarded?
Wrong... not surprising. Show me where I stated they have increased Darla.
This is SF. He made two completely conflicting claims on this thread, and gave a link for both of them. He throws so much bs up in an attempt to distract people so they don't catch his bullshit. It often works for him, but never did with me which is why he goes sideways.
I mean, what he did here is actually hysterical. He fucking made the claim that the number of hurricanes have increased and gave a link, and then made the claim they have decreased and gave a link.
This is real vindication because I never go to that asshat's links. I know he is full of shit, cause I know him. This was beautiful though.
No I don't go to your links, I know how full of shit you are. Who do you think you are talking to, Tom?
You made two different claims and claimed to have links for both of them. Typical SF.
i"m still wondering why only storms that hit the US count. That seems . . . odd.
LMAO... because Darla was talking about what she could see out her window.
If you have global data on hurricanes, by all means post it and stop your whining.