A Harvard economist found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings

cawacko said:
Rune, how come we often read about wealth broke down by different races?

You can throw gender in there as well as how often do we hear that women earn $0.77 on the dollar compared to men. Does your dictionary definition say anything about that?
Click to expand...

Is your google finger broken again?
 
cawacko said:
So once again, you can't back up what you say and want others to go do it for you.
Click to expand...

I am not here to print dictionary definitions for you but I will paraphrase;
"Economics is the study of means of production and the distribution of the products thereof."
 
Rune said:
I am not here to print dictionary definitions for you but I will paraphrase;
"Economics is the study of means of production and the distribution of the products thereof."
Click to expand...

So because race is not explicitly stated in the dictionary definition you think it has nothing to do with econonics?
 
Rana said:
There has already been criticism of this report stating that he extrapolated from limited data.
Click to expand...

It's one of the reasons I'm skeptical of global warming lol.

I think you mean 'a criticism'. Going by the volume of the 'cops are after blacks' rhetoric it's surprising even a small sample would lead to such a conclusion.
 
Rune said:
So Grind, economics includes race relations now?
Who knew?
Click to expand...

Do you even realize economists deal with statistics?

Freyer and a group of students spent over 3,000 hours sifting through police data from 10 major police departments in three states: Texas, Florida, and California.

They examined 1,332 shootings between 2000 and 2015. In those shootings, the study found that police officers were more likely to fire their weapons without having been attacked when the suspects were white. Black and white civilians involved in police shootings were also equally likely to have been carrying a gun.
Click to expand...

Good one Retard Rune!
 
Clock Town said:
your question is pedantic and idiotic. First the study is about police killing others, not people killing police. Second a sample size of 5 during a recent event would hardly skew the sample. You are a mouth breather, please do not come near me anymore. I do not tolerate morons like yourself in my presence.
Click to expand...

Did the Harvard economist say that it is AOK to murder the police if a policeman murders another person. Hate is wrong all the way around, as is the crime that the police defend against.
 
Ziggy said:
Did the Harvard economist say that it is AOK to murder the police if a policeman murders another person. Hate is wrong all the way around, as is the crime that the police defend against.
Click to expand...

He actually stated it on page 37 of the report.
 
Yup. Just like hands up don't shoot. BLM and the entire movement against cops is based on lies. Fed to them by the Democrat party and a corrupt media.

The left loves creating false narratives then running with them, even after they've been proven categorically false.
 
Clock Town said:
http://www.businessinsider.com/study-finds-no-racial-bias-in-police-shootings-2016-7#comments

Is there racism against black people? Yup. But as far as this (now false) narrative of cops running around unjustly shooting african americans, it's simply another lie, made up bullshit. Black people are not killed by cops any more than white people are.

Desh, these are facts.
Click to expand...
Im less concerned about racial bias, easy for me to say, than I am about the militarization of our police.
 
Irish said:
Yup. Just like hands up don't shoot. BLM and the entire movement against cops is based on lies. Fed to them by the Democrat party and a corrupt media.

The left loves creating false narratives then running with them, even after they've been proven categorically false.
Click to expand...

I have come to believe liberals prefer to be lied to.

"If you like your plan you can keep your plan"

"I never sent classified information"

"I won't cum in your mouth"

Etc
 
According to liberals blacks commit no robberies, no murders, no robberies, no drug offenses but just get picked on by cops

One thing to point out is that these incidents happen in places dominated by blacks and democrats. Maybe they should start there?

:dunno:
 
Islam Sucks said:
According to liberals blacks commit no robberies, no murders, no robberies, no drug offenses but just get picked on by cops

One thing to point out is that these incidents happen in places dominated by blacks and democrats. Maybe they should start there?

:dunno:
Click to expand...

Yes Baltimore was still racist, even though the city is run by black dems. Maybe they should evict themselves from office?
 
STFU economists stay in your own goddamn discipline.

Why should anyone take anything any economist says seriously anymore? There's no discipline that's ever been more wrong than they have.
 
Think about all the shit they've been wrong about with the economy since 2008. And they want us to take them seriously when they're invading other disciplines and publishing studies that don't even have anything to do with economics?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top