A good case and argument for torture....

D

Dixie - In Memoriam

New member
I've been following he vander Sloot murder in Peru, being here in Natalie Holloway's home state, we have heard about it for several days in the news. I have always believed he killed Natalie, and now I am absolutely certain he did. The question is, what happened to the body?

People have talked about 'torture' and how it's not conducive to obtaining information, but I would be willing to bet, you put that slick-headed Dutch boy in a room with Bruno, and give him the option to spill the beans on what happened and where her body is, or get worked over by Bruno, and it wouldn't take more than about 10 minutes to get that information.

If there were ever a case where I would absolutely condone torture, this would be it!
 
People who advocate torture should be executed, without question. Then maybe we could get nonhuman animals like dixie to STFU about torture.
 
What about the Origional Intent of the Constitution of the United States of America?
 
Jarod said:
So is Crule and Unusual punishment okay in your book?
Click to expand...

no, but that wasn't the point of my statement, which is your propensity and desire for a very large bureaucratic government is completely opposite of the founders original intent with regards to the constitution.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
no, but that wasn't the point of my statement, which is your propensity and desire for a very large bureaucratic government is completely opposite of the founders original intent with regards to the constitution.
Click to expand...

So where you upset by Bush using torture methods?
 
Dixie said:
I've been following he vander Sloot murder in Peru, being here in Natalie Holloway's home state, we have heard about it for several days in the news. I have always believed he killed Natalie, and now I am absolutely certain he did. The question is, what happened to the body?

People have talked about 'torture' and how it's not conducive to obtaining information, but I would be willing to bet, you put that slick-headed Dutch boy in a room with Bruno, and give him the option to spill the beans on what happened and where her body is, or get worked over by Bruno, and it wouldn't take more than about 10 minutes to get that information.

If there were ever a case where I would absolutely condone torture, this would be it!
Click to expand...
Dixie, I don't know who scares me more you or Vander Sloot? I'm all for giving Vander Sloot a fair trial and a hanging but I'm not about to sacrifice my principles in order to do so.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Dixie, I don't know who scares me more you or Vander Sloot? I'm all for giving Vander Sloot a fair trial and a hanging but I'm not about to sacrifice my principles in order to do so.
Click to expand...

i dont know. I actually can agree with dixie on this, only insomuch as knowing that 5 seconds of bruno staring at van dersloot would have this kid spilling his guts between whiny sobs of 'don't beat me bro'.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Dixie, I don't know who scares me more you or Vander Sloot? I'm all for giving Vander Sloot a fair trial and a hanging but I'm not about to sacrifice my principles in order to do so.
Click to expand...

Hey, I'm just saying....

Look, I can see the argument about torturing people who MAY have information, and the points about how that kind of interrogation doesn't often produce accurate results... but in this particular case, we know that vander Sloot knows what happened to Natalie Holloway, the little shit is just not talking! I think 15 minutes with Bruno might actually result in bringing closure for the Holloway family.

Sorry about your principles, mine revolve around what is right and wrong, and justice prevailing. Having Bruno beat the living dog shit out of this punk until he tells us where the body of Natalie Holloway is, and what happened, is completely in line with MY principles.
 
Dixie said:
Hey, I'm just saying....

Look, I can see the argument about torturing people who MAY have information, and the points about how that kind of interrogation doesn't often produce accurate results... but in this particular case, we know that vander Sloot knows what happened to Natalie Holloway, the little shit is just not talking! I think 15 minutes with Bruno might actually result in bringing closure for the Holloway family.

Sorry about your principles, mine revolve around what is right and wrong, and justice prevailing. Having Bruno beat the living dog shit out of this punk until he tells us where the body of Natalie Holloway is, and what happened, is completely in line with MY principles.
Click to expand...
Dixie, I got a sneaky feeling even the Holloway's would disagree with you. It's just simply wrong to torture. If they can torture creep like Vander Sloot then the could torture me......and I'm not about to pay extra for that!!!
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Dixie, I got a sneaky feeling even the Holloway's would disagree with you. It's just simply wrong to torture. If they can torture creep like Vander Sloot then the could torture me......and I'm not about to pay extra for that!!!
Click to expand...

Setting aside the fact that I believe a little torture might actually do you some good, if you knew for certain where you hid a body of someone you murdered, I would indeed favor 15 minutes of Bruno for you.

Having personally spoken with Natalies Dad, I can assure you he would indeed favor my idea, with one small exception, he would want to play the part of Bruno! Mott, I want you to take your stupid hat off for a moment, and just pretend Natalie Holloway was your sister... you're telling me you wouldn't want to get this punk alone in a room for 15 minutes?
 
Sloot is a typical elitist home-boy rich kid who looks at tourists with disdain. Holloway was a fool to mess with him and unfortunately paid the extreme price for her mistake.

She's dead and it doesn't matter where the body is. Probably fish meal.

Sloot deserves to die, after being Bruno's receptacle for at least ten years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top