A corrupt and biased media

Thing1 said:
The point was made yesterday that - had Hillary told the Russians classified information, tried to coax the FBI Director to dismiss a case against someone who had been on her staff and then fired him, and done the rest of what we have seen out of Trump - we'd already be in the midst of impeachment proceedings. And that is spot on.

This isn't about the establishment trying to take down someone who isn't from the "normal channels." The story here is a real estate guy who is totally unprepared for the office to which he was elected, and in way over his head.
Click to expand...

Dude, Russia very likely got a gold mine of classified information from Hillary's server. Not to mention every two bit hacker that attempted to access it.

But you, the media and the majority of congressional half-wits didn't think much of it.

In playing the extra-constitutional role of FBI head/prosecutor, Comey did more to damage voters confidence in the IC than Trump ever did.

Btw, they were interviewing Trey Gowdy last night. When pressed on Comey's July faux pas he said, to the effect, 'Comey had to do what he had to do' and then he backed off like he was about to reveal something he wasn't supposed to.

Tell us, Trey. What is it? Why was it important to protect Hillary?
 
Darth Omar said:
Dude, Russia very likely got a gold mine of classified information from Hillary's server. Not to mention every two bit hacker that attempted to access it.

But you, the media and the majority of congressional half-wits didn't think much of it.

In playing the extra-constitutional role of FBI head/prosecutor, Comey did more to damage voters confidence in the IC than Trump ever did.

Btw, they were interviewing Trey Gowdy last night. When pressed on Comey's July faux pas he said, to the effect, 'Comey had to do what he had to do' and then he backed off like he was about to reveal something he wasn't supposed to.

Tell us, Trey. What is it? Why was it important to protect Hillary?
Click to expand...

Re: the bolded...do you have anything specific?

Because with Trump, there is something very specific. And you still don't understand what he did, because I still see you asking how Russians would even be able to use the information. That wasn't the issue.

And your thoughts on Comey have nothing at all to do w/ reality. That's just how you see it from your ultra-partisan perspective.
 
Thing1 said:
Re: the bolded...do you have anything specific?

Because with Trump, there is something very specific. And you still don't understand what he did, because I still see you asking how Russians would even be able to use the information. That wasn't the issue.

And your thoughts on Comey have nothing at all to do w/ reality. That's just how you see it from your ultra-partisan perspective.
Click to expand...
so tell us..since you continuously say the same thing WTF the Russian can do w/ that intel?
 
anatta said:
so tell us..since you continuously say the same thing WTF the Russian can do w/ that intel?
Click to expand...

The only reason I keep saying it is because you & yours keep spewing misconceptions about the issue on this one.

This has close to ZERO to do w/ what the Russians can do w/ the intel. Trump allegedly gave the Russians enough information that they would be able to likely identify who the source of the intel was. This directly affects our security. It could easily cause our intel partner to suspend or even discontinue sharing information with us. So, at best, we probably lose a vital source of intelligence in the Middle East and for ISIS.

But the ramifications go beyond that, because what is the perception of the world community & our other sources of intelligence? Can they now trust the U.S. to keep a secret?
 
anatta said:
so tell us..since you continuously say the same thing WTF the Russian can do w/ that intel?
Click to expand...

Well, that's beside the point, but what the point is seems a little elusive lol.

The only reason anyone knows about it because there's a mole somewhere. If Obama [or anyone else] had a small army of leakers aligned against him the results would have been the same: an administration in perpetual damage control that can't advance its agenda.

They think we're stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top