A Conservative Judge Torched Donald Trump’s Latest Illegal Assault on Immigrants

Did you read the statute?

What's happening here to you is exactly what happens to every first year law student who can't get out of their own way.

I'm curious why you are raising this argument regarding people south of the Mexican border waiting to apply for refugee status?...
 
Have you noticed the name of the thread?

A Conservative Judge Torched Donald Trump’s Latest Illegal Assault on Immigrants
which has nothing to do with people who are IN the country.......

president cannot rewrite a federal statute to deny asylum to immigrants who enter the country without authorization

that has no impact on Trump preventing the refugee caravan from entering the country without authorization.......
 
Seeing as how the title of the thread is a lie; because I wasn't aware that the President is the one who brought this suit before the SC, why would it be necessary??

I would suggest you change your usual habit of feigning ignorance, and actually read the ruling. The title of the thread may offend your low IQ sensitivities, however, it is accurate to those who actually follow the news:

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/12/07/18-17274.pdf

BTW, the first person named as a Defendant is your precious leader.
 
Saw the title and asked myself how anyone could be so uninformed and/or misinformed. Then I clicked on it and saw that your source is Slate (LMAO). Why not upgrade to something slightly less absurdly biased, like the Daily Kos, Occupy Democrats, or the Communist Manifesto? Then I also saw that the basis of Slate's ridiculous propaganda piece was the ridiculous Constitution-shredding extremists of the 9th Circuit (the lunatic leftists who get overturned so much by the Supreme Court).

What a solid foundation on which to base a thread. :laugh:

Newsflash: Constitutional rights do not apply to non-citizens (obviously), and Obama arbitrarily and illegally re-wrote the law at every turn, while being cheered on by you hypocrites who now pretend to give a rat's ass about the Constitution you are endlessly at war with. This is what an actual lawless tyrant looks like:

GetAttachmentThumbnail


Try again there, Sparky. lol

its illegal you fucking traitor


the founders made sure dick bags like trump could not ruin this nation
 
Democrats have two choices, help fund the wall, or continue to allow people into the country illegally and own that.

not good times to be a Democrat theses days, really shitty choices huh?

:rofl2:
 
If there were any lingering doubt that Donald Trump’s latest plan to curb asylum is flatly unlawful, Judge Jay Bybee quashed it on Friday.

In a meticulous 65-page opinion, Bybee—a conservative George W. Bush appointee—explained that the president cannot rewrite a federal statute to deny asylum to immigrants who enter the country without authorization. His decision for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is a twofold rebuke to Trump, halting the president’s legal assault on asylum-seekers and undermining his claim that any judge who blocked the order is a Democratic hack. The reality is that anyone who understands the English language should recognize that Trump’s new rule is illegal. Like so many of Trump’s attention-grabbing proposals, this doomed policy should never have been treated as legitimate in the first place.


https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/12/bush-judge-rejects-trump-asylum-plan.html

This is why those charges about destroying democracy, fascism, etc. are so silly. The checks and balances in our system prevent any president from overstepping his authority. Congress and court decisions have blocked Trump several times---the system works the way it is supposed to.
 
Democrats have two choices, help fund the wall, or continue to allow people into the country illegally and own that.

not good times to be a Democrat theses days, really shitty choices huh?

:rofl2:

Trump wants you to believe there's a crisis at the border.. There isn't. He's playing you... and he thinks you're stupid.
 
Saw the title and asked myself how anyone could be so uninformed and/or misinformed. Then I clicked on it and saw that your source is Slate (LMAO). Why not upgrade to something slightly less absurdly biased, like the Daily Kos, Occupy Democrats, or the Communist Manifesto? Then I also saw that the basis of Slate's ridiculous propaganda piece was the ridiculous Constitution-shredding extremists of the 9th Circuit (the lunatic leftists who get overturned so much by the Supreme Court).

What a solid foundation on which to base a thread. :laugh:

Newsflash: Constitutional rights do not apply to non-citizens (obviously), and Obama arbitrarily and illegally re-wrote the law at every turn, while being cheered on by you hypocrites who now pretend to give a rat's ass about the Constitution you are endlessly at war with. This is what an actual lawless tyrant looks like:

GetAttachmentThumbnail


Try again there, Sparky. lol

Constitutional rights apply to all persons on US soil. Can't you read?
 
Nope; because it mentions Trump and Trump never brought this suit to the Court. :D

LOL, again you show your ignorance. Trump is the DEFENDANT. Do you know what a DEFENDANT is? I have never heard of a Defendant filing a suit in Court.

Yu are truly one ignorant dog fucker.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top