When it comes to climate science, the Guardian was totally discredited years ago. I wonder if this article is by the infamous Dana Nuccitelli? Rana in her desperation has posted a useless link, says it all! You do have to ask yourself a question as to why she would move from the coldest state to the hottest if she truly believes that the world is burning up!!
If I want to listen to a serious woman on the subject, not a loony cookie baking feminazi, then I would turn to somebody like Judith Curry!
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/judi...nceits-of-consensus/amp/?client=chrome-mobile
https://judithcurry.com
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
The entire point in accepting or denying the effect that humanity has upon the weather is the lack of observation of a specific effect claimed by those propagating Climate Change as a political tool. There is no possible way to measure or quantify the effect of Co2, regardless of its percentage increases or decreases....until there is an objective standard that exists to measure for TRUTH. In other words until the actual effect of Co2 is recorded via science as an actual adverse reality to humanity and life itself...there can be no standard due to the fact that man has only had the capacity to emit vast amounts of Co2 into the atmosphere for just a blink as time is measured. If there is any real negative effect all that exists is useless speculation and conjecture in consideration of a theory that has no standard to justly quantify the reality claimed. 