So much for free speech.
Suppose she had said Trump is a known faggot, like Jesus.
So much for free speech.
A California middle school REMOVED a history teacher who told her students that Trump is still president.
Who agrees the school was right to remove the teacher?
View attachment 23346![]()
Suppose she had said Trump is a known faggot, like Jesus.
So, you agree that teachers should be able to use the word "gay?"
The nuns when I was in the 5th grade showed us a film on reproduction. That was back in the 60’s, I don’t understand why christofascists are so freaked out by biology and sexuality.I don't think that teachers should be talking about sex to young kids if that's where you're going.
We both know that the only faggot here is you.
The nuns when I was in the 5th grade showed us a film on reproduction. That was back in the 60’s, I don’t understand why christofascists are so freaked out by biology and sexuality.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Once again for the cheap seats: you right to free speech is protected under the Constitution. However, one is NOT protected from the consequences of said speech. That is why you have laws in all 50 states regarding slander, libel, inciting to riot, disturbing the peace, and such.
That's correct but it's too complex for the poorly educated MAGA Morons to comprehend.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
the rest of the quote, "However, one is NOT protected from the consequences of said speech. That is why you have laws in all 50 states regarding slander, libel, inciting to riot, disturbing the peace, and such."
Why do you edit out what you don't like when it's so easy to provide the full version of a response to the audience? You're not making yourself look any smarter or mature.
Why do you ignore the fact that had the teacher expressed liberal views she would not have been fired.
Sounds like you'd be cool with a teacher telling their history students that the Holocaust didn't happen, right?So much for free speech.
Apparently not if you work for a government run school system and expose non-liberal views.
That depends on what is meant by "told". We need more information.
If it was put up for discussion, that's arguably OK. If the teacher simply told her students as a matter of fact, that's false and she was rightly suspended.
I'm guessing that you're referring to the teacher's union's attempts to sexualize the nation's children. What kind of pervert supports that?
A quote and context is required for me to form an opinion.
What happened to free speech, hm?
Expressing non-liberal views =/= lying to your history students.
Sounds like you'd be cool with a teacher telling their history students that the Holocaust didn't happen, right?
Are you conflating all view points with lies? Because if you are, then teachers of all political stripes would be suspended or fired.
Obviously, you don't have any concrete examples of a teacher pushing a "leftie" lie, being reported and not being fired. If you did, you'd have posted it by now.
Bottom line: I exposed one of your stupid tactics, and I am now challenging your usual stint of pushing your opinion as fact with no valid documentation.
So you support that.
Nice try.