95% of Apple shareholders say NO to quota hiring of non-whites

CFM said:
Strange you say what I want yet provide no proof of it. How about be a man and back up your claim.

Your own words prove you justify illegal immigration. Traitor. Why don't you tell us why. Perhaps I already hit on why you want to cater to criminals.
Click to expand...
CFM, you've made your beliefs quite clear. You took issue with me calling TDAK a poor for his racist statements because you generally share the same beliefs he does. It's why you came to his defense. You've made comments against more legal immigration into his country. Your issue isn't an economic one it's a racial one.
 
cawacko said:
CFM, you've made your beliefs quite clear. You took issue with me calling TDAK a poor for his racist statements because you generally share the same beliefs he does. It's why you came to his defense. You've made comments against more legal immigration into his country. Your issue isn't an economic one it's a racial one.
Click to expand...

In other words, you don't have proof. You just run your dick sucker.

I didn't have issue with you saying it. My issue is that you say things that you don't prove. You're doing it with me unless you have proof. By the way, you saying it isn't proof. Do you have any?

On the concept of proof, you've proven that you justify illegal immigration. You oppose things that punish them for breaking the law and want to change the laws to cater to them. Traitor.
 
CFM said:
In other words, you don't have proof. You just run your dick sucker.

I didn't have issue with you saying it. My issue is that you say things that you don't prove. You're doing it with me unless you have proof. By the way, you saying it isn't proof. Do you have any?

On the concept of proof, you've proven that you justify illegal immigration. You oppose things that punish them for breaking the law and want to change the laws to cater to them. Traitor.
Click to expand...

You're upset that I called TDAK a poor because I don't have proof? We're on a message board. Logic dictates I can't prove anything. I can't prove you're a person and not a machine posting here.

I notice you won't address why you want less legal immigration. That's what is at the core here and we both know the reason why.
 
cawacko said:
You're upset that I called TDAK a poor because I don't have proof? We're on a message board. Logic dictates I can't prove anything. I can't prove you're a person and not a machine posting here.

I notice you won't address why you want less legal immigration. That's what is at the core here and we both know the reason why.
Click to expand...

You're the one claiming all these things about me related to legal immigration. I notice you have't provided proof of your claim. That's what is at the core here. When you have real proof not just a claim you made up, let me know. If you know, you won't have a hard time providing something to back up those claims. Until now, all you've provided is a claim using YOU as a source.
 
cawacko said:
Selective in what way?
Click to expand...

You've already claimed my views on legal immigration are based on race. You haven't proven a damn thing but you've claimed it.

Afraid to answer my question about why you justify catering to illegals? I answered your question about legal immigration.
 
No CFM, I'm asking your opinion. It's not a gotcha question. It's a discussion on a political board and I'm asking your political opinion. You said you would like to see us be more selective in our legal immigration. I'm asking selective in what way?
 
cawacko said:
No CFM, I'm asking your opinion. It's not a gotcha question. It's a discussion on a political board and I'm asking your political opinion. You said you would like to see us be more selective in our legal immigration. I'm asking selective in what way?
Click to expand...

And I answered your question about more/less legal immigration. At the same time, I posed a question of you that you have yet to answer.

You're not asking my opinion. That's a lie. You've already claimed how you think related to my statements about legal immigration. I guess when you expected to provide proof, you back off the claim, pussy.
 
LOL, I'm a pussy for asking your opinion? Ok. Is that because you are afraid to state your opinion? Funny you get mad when someone makes an assumption and asks your opinion.
 
cawacko said:
LOL, I'm a pussy for asking your opinion? Ok. Is that because you are afraid to state your opinion? Funny you get mad when someone makes an assumption and asks your opinion.
Click to expand...

You didn't make an assumption. You stated something about me claiming it was fact.

You don't want my opinion. If you say so now, you're a proven liar. You also said asking me wasn't a gotcha question. That is also a lie. You made claims about me going as far as to give a reason why you KNEW what you said was the truth. In order to know, you would have to have evidence. You had none yet you stated as if you did. I answer your question. What makes you a pussy is you've been asked multiple times one about your feelings on illegal immigration and you're yet to answer. Why is that, coward?
 
CFM said:
You didn't make an assumption. You stated something about me claiming it was fact.

You don't want my opinion. If you say so now, you're a proven liar. You also said asking me wasn't a gotcha question. That is also a lie. You made claims about me going as far as to give a reason why you KNEW what you said was the truth. In order to know, you would have to have evidence. You had none yet you stated as if you did. I answer your question. What makes you a pussy is you've been asked multiple times one about your feelings on illegal immigration and you're yet to answer. Why is that, coward?
Click to expand...

Actually I have answered, you just didn't like it. I've said my belief is we should target those with criminal records first. People like the guy who killed Kate Steinly in SF. The first goal should be to deport all with criminal records. Make them a priority.

I've also explained how I would change our immigration laws. You didn't like those ideas either but I laid them out for you.
 
CFM said:
You didn't make an assumption. You stated something about me claiming it was fact.

You don't want my opinion. If you say so now, you're a proven liar. You also said asking me wasn't a gotcha question. That is also a lie. You made claims about me going as far as to give a reason why you KNEW what you said was the truth. In order to know, you would have to have evidence. You had none yet you stated as if you did. I answer your question. What makes you a pussy is you've been asked multiple times one about your feelings on illegal immigration and you're yet to answer. Why is that, coward?
Click to expand...

No CFM, the pussy is you. You can't state your belief on legal immigration and how we should be more selective.
 
cawacko said:
No CFM, the pussy is you. You can't state your belief on legal immigration and how we should be more selective.
Click to expand...

I answered your question about whether or not legal immigration should increase or decrease. Part of that post included a question of you about illegal immigration. You avoided and continue to avoid answering it. What are you afraid of, that my opinion of why you cater to those pieces of shit is true? Must be. That makes you worse than them. You enable them to break the law, TRAITOR.
 
CFM said:
I answered your question about whether or not legal immigration should increase or decrease. Part of that post included a question of you about illegal immigration. You avoided and continue to avoid answering it. What are you afraid of, that my opinion of why you cater to those pieces of shit is true? Must be. That makes you worse than them. You enable them to break the law, TRAITOR.
Click to expand...

So you don't have the ability to describe how you think we should be more selective?
 
cawacko said:
So you don't have the ability to describe how you think we should be more selective?
Click to expand...

So you don't have the guts to state where you stand on illegals?

Only let those in that are willing to adapt to the culture here. Keep out those that demand it be modified to suit them. You figure who gets in and who gets left out.
 
CFM said:
So you don't have the guts to state where you stand on illegals?

Only let those in that are willing to adapt to the culture here. Keep out those that demand it be modified to suit them. You figure who gets in and who gets left out.
Click to expand...

I just gave you my position dude. What is not clear about it?

How do you know ahead of time who is willing to adopt to the culture and who isn't?
 
cawacko said:
I just gave you my position dude. What is not clear about it?

How do you know ahead of time who is willing to adopt to the culture and who isn't?
Click to expand...

So your position is to cater to the illegal pieces of shit because they don't like the rules?

You're a traitor that deserves the fate of one.
 
CFM said:
So your position is to cater to the illegal pieces of shit because they don't like the rules?

You're a traitor that deserves the fate of one.
Click to expand...

I see with your lack of reading comprehension and understanding, along with a lack of basic economics, racism works well for you. You and TDAK make good buddies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top