81% of somali households in Minnesota are on welfare!!!

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Numbers are about the same for our native blacks. Diversity is destroying america. We need MAWA.

dec 10 2025 More than 8-in-10 households headed by Somali refugees in the state of Minnesota are on one or more forms of American taxpayer-funded welfare, new data published by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) reveals.
In particular, the data shows that 81 percent of Minnesota households headed by Somali refugees are on one or more forms of welfare, including 27 percent who are on cash welfare, 54 percent who are on food stamps, and 73 percent who are on Medicaid.

Compare this massive welfare use to native-born Americans residing in Minnesota, only 21 percent of whom are on one or more forms of welfare, including just 6 percent who are on cash welfare, 7 percent who are on food stamps, and 18 percent who are on Medicaid.
Click to expand...
Welfare use goes even higher for Somali households where children are in the home, the ACS data finds.

For example, 89 percent of Somali-headed households with children in Minnesota are on one or more forms of welfare, as 86 percent are on Medicaid. About 62 percent of Somali households with children in the state are on food stamps, while 23 percent take cash welfare.

“Nearly every Somali household with children … receives some form of welfare,” CIS researcher Jason Richwine writes.
Click to expand...

www.breitbart.com

Minnesota: 'Nearly Every' Somali Household with Children Is on Welfare

A startling 81 percent of households headed by Somali refugees in Minnesota are on one or more forms of American taxpayer-funded welfare.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) is an American rightwing anti-immigration think tank

While claiming non-partisanship, it's linked to the anti-immigrant John Tanton Network and has been labeled an "anti-immigrant hate group" due to its associations with white nationalists and publishing racist writers
 
Guno צְבִי said:
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) is an American rightwing anti-immigration think tank

While claiming non-partisanship, it's linked to the anti-immigrant John Tanton Network and has been labeled an "anti-immigrant hate group" due to its associations with white nationalists and publishing racist writers
Click to expand...
By whom is it linked? Other than that, you posted nothing but ad hominem.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
By whom is it linked?
Click to expand...

He was linked to it by being one of the co-founders. Six of the groups he founded were designated hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
T. A. Gardner said:
Other than that, you posted nothing but ad hominem.
Click to expand...



What do you think TDAKs post was?

If you go look at the actual numbers and the margin of error for the small sample size, the claims don't hold up Then this is data over a 10 year period. The fact that 80% of household may have received assistance at some point during that 10 year period doesn't mean 80% were receiving that assistance every year for those 10 years.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
He was linked to it by being one of the co-founders. Six of the groups he founded were designated hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Click to expand...

Ah! I figured as much. You do know that the SPLC has been thoroughly discredited as a source don't you?

afajournal.org

FBI: SPLC not a reliable source

Southern Poverty Law Center is losing traction with its list of Christian and conservative “hate groups.” The U. S. Justice Department and the FBI have said they no longer trust the SPLC.
afajournal.org afajournal.org


www.usatoday.com

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered

After internal challenges with discrimination, the Southern Poverty Law Center can't call itself an arbiter of justice.
www.usatoday.com

www.newyorker.com

The Reckoning of Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center

The work at the S.P.L.C. could be meaningful and gratifying. But it was hard, for many of us there, not to feel like we’d become pawns in what was, in many respects, a highly profitable scam.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com

lawandcrime.com

Southern Poverty Law Center Must Pay $3.3 Million After Falsely Naming Anti-Muslim Extremists | Law & Crime

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has been hit with a big payout after losing in a defamation lawsuit to Quilliam International and Maajid Nawaz, the founder of the organization. Nawaz objected to being mentioned in SPLC's "Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists" and sued for defamation.
lawandcrime.com lawandcrime.com


The SPLC is on the level of Infowars and Alex Jones, and even the Left grudgingly admits it.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
What do you think TDAKs post was?

If you go look at the actual numbers and the margin of error for the small sample size, the claims don't hold up Then this is data over a 10 year period. The fact that 80% of household may have received assistance at some point during that 10 year period doesn't mean 80% were receiving that assistance every year for those 10 years.
Click to expand...
I wasn't responding to TDAK's posts as I usually ignore them as racist, hate filled, content not worth responding to.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Ah! I figured as much. You do know that the SPLC has been thoroughly discredited as a source don't you?

afajournal.org

FBI: SPLC not a reliable source

Southern Poverty Law Center is losing traction with its list of Christian and conservative “hate groups.” The U. S. Justice Department and the FBI have said they no longer trust the SPLC.
afajournal.org afajournal.org
Click to expand...
I see you didn't actually read your sources.
Because the FBI doesn't use SPLC as a source doesn't discredit them any more than you are discredited because the FBI doesn't use you as a source.
Greg Guttfield is the only quoted source in that piece. Are you sure you want to use it?
T. A. Gardner said:
Click to expand...
Interesting, The FBI cut ties with SPLC in 2017 according to the first article and now it is claimed they cut ties in 2025 by Patel. Which is it? It can't be both.
T. A. Gardner said:
www.usatoday.com

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered

After internal challenges with discrimination, the Southern Poverty Law Center can't call itself an arbiter of justice.
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
once again, the FBI not using them as a source doesn't discredit them. This is the same source as the first article just rewritten as an opinion piece in USA today.
T. A. Gardner said:
www.newyorker.com

The Reckoning of Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center

The work at the S.P.L.C. could be meaningful and gratifying. But it was hard, for many of us there, not to feel like we’d become pawns in what was, in many respects, a highly profitable scam.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com
Click to expand...
You clearly didn't read that article since it disputes your thesis about the SPLC and only discusses Dees and his reputation with women.
T. A. Gardner said:
Click to expand...
An interesting argument on your pa...56d-11e8-9780-b1dd6a09b549_story.html[/QUOTE]
Repeat of the previous story.
T. A. Gardner said:
The SPLC is on the level of Infowars and Alex Jones, and even the Left grudgingly admits it.

I wasn't responding to TDAK's posts as I usually ignore them as racist, hate filled, content not worth responding to.
Click to expand...
ROFLMAO. At this point your attempt has shown that all your sources are even guiltier of what you are trying to paint the SPLC with.

SPLC is bad because the founder was bad so doesn't that show that TDAK's source was bad because the co-founder was bad?
SPLC is bad because they got a fact wrong and had to retract it so doesn't that make most of your sources bad since they have all had to retract statements?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Ah! I figured as much. You do know that the SPLC has been thoroughly discredited as a source don't you?

afajournal.org

FBI: SPLC not a reliable source

Southern Poverty Law Center is losing traction with its list of Christian and conservative “hate groups.” The U. S. Justice Department and the FBI have said they no longer trust the SPLC.
afajournal.org afajournal.org


www.usatoday.com

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered

After internal challenges with discrimination, the Southern Poverty Law Center can't call itself an arbiter of justice.
www.usatoday.com

www.newyorker.com

The Reckoning of Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center

The work at the S.P.L.C. could be meaningful and gratifying. But it was hard, for many of us there, not to feel like we’d become pawns in what was, in many respects, a highly profitable scam.
www.newyorker.com www.newyorker.com

lawandcrime.com

Southern Poverty Law Center Must Pay $3.3 Million After Falsely Naming Anti-Muslim Extremists | Law & Crime

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has been hit with a big payout after losing in a defamation lawsuit to Quilliam International and Maajid Nawaz, the founder of the organization. Nawaz objected to being mentioned in SPLC's "Field Guide to Anti-Muslim Extremists" and sued for defamation.
lawandcrime.com lawandcrime.com


The SPLC is on the level of Infowars and Alex Jones, and even the Left grudgingly admits it.

I wasn't responding to TDAK's posts as I usually ignore them as racist, hate filled, content not worth responding to.
Click to expand...
The Republicans claimed that it is not reliable.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I see you didn't actually read your sources.
Because the FBI doesn't use SPLC as a source doesn't discredit them any more than you are discredited because the FBI doesn't use you as a source.
Greg Guttfield is the only quoted source in that piece. Are you sure you want to use it?

Interesting, The FBI cut ties with SPLC in 2017 according to the first article and now it is claimed they cut ties in 2025 by Patel. Which is it? It can't be both.

once again, the FBI not using them as a source doesn't discredit them. This is the same source as the first article just rewritten as an opinion piece in USA today.

You clearly didn't read that article since it disputes your thesis about the SPLC and only discusses Dees and his reputation with women.
Repeat of the previous story.

ROFLMAO. At this point your attempt has shown that all your sources are even guiltier of what you are trying to paint the SPLC with.

SPLC is bad because the founder was bad so doesn't that show that TDAK's source was bad because the co-founder was bad?
SPLC is bad because they got a fact wrong and had to retract it so doesn't that make most of your sources bad since they have all had to retract statements?
Click to expand...
I see you failed to grasp my point. Instead, you resorted to trivial objections and argumentum ad absurdum.

My point is the FBI, and pretty much every other credible source, knows that the SPLC is an unreliable and untrusted source of information. Their repeated losses in court for deformation, libel, and the like are one indicator. That officials won't rely on their information is another. The SPLC was and is bad as a source of information because they have a severe political bias and are pushing a political agenda rather than trying in the least to be objective purveyors of information.

They are on the level of Infowars and Alex Jones.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I see you failed to grasp my point. Instead, you resorted to trivial objections and argumentum ad absurdum.

My point is the FBI, and pretty much every other credible source, knows that the SPLC is an unreliable and untrusted source of information. Their repeated losses in court for deformation, libel, and the like are one indicator. That officials won't rely on their information is another. The SPLC was and is bad as a source of information because they have a severe political bias and are pushing a political agenda rather than trying in the least to be objective purveyors of information.

They are on the level of Infowars and Alex Jones.
Click to expand...
Every other credible source?
Fox News and far right opinion writers think it isn't credible. The FBI is supposed to do their own research on groups rather than relying on the research of others. But they only cut ties because of MAGA complaints not because the SPLC wasn't reliable.

Repeated losses? You presented ONE loss. Does it make them reliable if they have one win?

I am curious if you have ever even looked at the SPLC information. My guess is not.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Every other credible source?
Fox News and far right opinion writers think it isn't credible. The FBI is supposed to do their own research on groups rather than relying on the research of others. But they only cut ties because of MAGA complaints not because the SPLC wasn't reliable.

Repeated losses? You presented ONE loss. Does it make them reliable if they have one win?

I am curious if you have ever even looked at the SPLC information. My guess is not.
Click to expand...
Yes, I have. Their "Hate map" and everything that goes with it is a one-sided hit piece against groups that aren't on the Left. They omit lots of radical Leftist hate groups of various sorts using all types of convoluted excuses for them where they even deign to mention them. They often target people and groups on the Right using libelous statements that usually end them up in court where they lose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top