Jake Starkey
Verified User
Just because some citizens are successful doesn't mean they all are.
T. A. loves fallacies of false equivalencies.
T. A. loves fallacies of false equivalencies.
I never said all citizens are "successful." Many aren't. ButJust because some citizens are successful doesn't mean they all are.
T. A. loves fallacies of false equivalencies.
No, this is you argument. You glommed on to 'successful.' Define it. This is your argument to prove, not mine.I never said all citizens are "successful." Many aren't. But
1. Define "successful."
2. List why citizens aren't successful.
Right now, you're talking in glittering generalities.
Trump-omics.
Americans’ anger about the economy hits Trump and Republicans’ midterm prospects
CNN’s poll, conducted by SSRS, finds a surge in people naming high prices and the cost of living as the top economic problem facing their family. Strong majorities are pessimistic about the economy as a whole — almost 7 in 10 believe a recession is likely in the next year — and about their own ability to cover expenses and make purchases.
Those negative feelings about the economy, with major political implications for the midterms, reflect the strain across economic, generational and partisan lines on Americans’ everyday lives. Many people are trimming their grocery lists and cutting back spending on extras, and few feel comfortably able to save.
Successful at its lowest, is that someone can meet their basic needs, no frills. That's something like $35,000 to $50,000 a year. Just because you want the latest cell phone, or to drive a nice car, doesn't equate to being in need.No, this is you argument. You glommed on to 'successful.' Define it. This is your argument to prove, not mine.
it worked with the banker bailouts, didnt it banker cocksucker butt boy?The stupidity comes with the idea that you can fix their failures by simply handing them money.