Gondwanaland
Verified User
If it was not for The Hill, we wouldn't have known about the poll.
And..... ?
PS: The poll is literally right there on the CNN page linked, you dumb twat, how do you think I know how many respondents it used?
If it was not for The Hill, we wouldn't have known about the poll.
And..... ?
PS: The poll is literally right there on the CNN page linked, you dumb twat, how do you think I know how many respondents it used?
Again, the page is a list of updates. Do you really think many would go through updates?
Also, The Hill lends the polls some validity.
It’s fun for Sock Hunters to find out who are the lying scumbags on the forum.Oh, no doubt. Total smelly sock - but that's ok because socks being legal is something you totally love about JPP, amirite?
![]()
The fuck do you mean 'go through updates'? It's literally the very first thing on the list.
And no, The Hill quoting a non-scientific poll does not lend any validity to said poll, you dumb cunt
No fucking shit, sherlock, you just gave a different link than the one provided in The Hill, dumbfuck, so of course it's fucking going to go to a different fucking thing, you fucking cunt-tard.
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-n...union-2023/h_2ba5925736eda5fb0883e61d8004793d
Um it's a direct link to that update. The update is not the first one on the top.
Again, as I have stated, nobody would have known about the poll if it was not for The Hill.
The Hill is a right wing news site.
Correct, it's a direct link to that update. That's the link that tehy provided you stupid fuck. Not your fucking retarded ass link.
And no there is nothing remotely right wing about The Hill.
Even the leftist MediaBiasFactCheck isn't retarded enough to make such a cunt-brained claim
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-hill/

Again, nobody would have known about the poll had it not been The Hill.
Wow thanks for proving my point unintentionally.![]()
I refuted your point, cum-for-brains

Despite Gwonda’s over-excitement about the topic, I agree with Media Bias Fact Check’s assessment that “The Hill” is “least biased”. Despite errors in the past, they are factual in their reporting.Um it's a direct link to that update. The update is not the first one on the top.
Again, as I have stated, nobody would have known about the poll if it was not for The Hill.
The Hill is a right wing news site.
The one by the Pedo Nazis on 1/6. Like these assholes:
Holy shit. Everything you say is total crap. It's almost funny!
…and certainly sad. Although I think there’s a good possibility he’s a sock of one of JPP’s RW hate-mongering geezers, he clearly fits the same profile of elderly, incellish, poorly-educated, Euro-American males who want to burn down the country before they die.
Oh, no doubt. Total smelly sock - but that's ok because socks being legal is something you totally love about JPP, amirite?
![]()
I know that, fucktard. The CNN page has a list of SOTUS updates, dumbass.
The point is that The Hill is one of the right wingers' favorites.
If it was not for The Hill, we wouldn't have known about the poll.